03.03.2014 Views

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

person falling to their death from a window ledge in 2003 and five people being treated for stab<br />

wounds.<br />

2.2 Within the event planning process, several public agencies have individual responsibilities to<br />

prevent or respond to these threats. The <strong>Carnival</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Group’s interim report rightly focused<br />

on the public safety profile of the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong> with all stakeholders expressing the need<br />

to prioritise the safety of <strong>Carnival</strong> goers and <strong>Carnival</strong> participants. In their submissions to the<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Group, the local authorities have stated that the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong> has now become a<br />

victim of its own success. Their argument is that attendance levels at the event are such that the<br />

ability of NHCT (and its successor, LNHCL) to discharge its responsibilities as the ‘event<br />

organiser’ has become increasingly difficult. In addition, all the statutory agencies are faced with<br />

increasing demands on their resources. It was therefore felt that any further growth in crowd<br />

numbers would make the <strong>Carnival</strong> less safe.<br />

Public Safety Recommendations of the Interim Report<br />

2.3 In its interim report, the <strong>Carnival</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Group set out fourteen key public safety profile<br />

recommendations 46 , which included:<br />

• the need to support NHCT (through secondments and increased financial resources) as the<br />

lead organisation responsible for co-ordinating an effective public safety strategy for<br />

<strong>Carnival</strong>.<br />

• the development of a <strong>Carnival</strong> communications strategy.<br />

• increasing the number of route marshals and stewards at <strong>Carnival</strong> 2001.<br />

• the immediate introduction of a non-circular processional route.<br />

• reducing the number and size of vehicles currently being used on the <strong>Carnival</strong> route.<br />

• re-introducing the MPS practice of allocating a police officer to each band/float (‘Band<br />

Serial Officers’).<br />

• relocating live stages and those static sound systems drawing crowds of over 5,000 people<br />

to more suitable sites within the existing <strong>Carnival</strong> area, or to alternative venues.<br />

• increasing the number and location of toilet facilities.<br />

• establishing a <strong>Carnival</strong> transport committee to develop an improved transport strategy.<br />

• ensuring that key <strong>Carnival</strong> facilities such as toilets and first aid areas are adequate in<br />

quantity and are clearly defined and signposted.<br />

• returning <strong>Carnival</strong> Sunday to “Children’s Day” and giving priority to those <strong>Carnival</strong><br />

activities and art forms that reflected traditional Caribbean culture.<br />

• the need for central Government support in the areas of i) public safety and policing and<br />

ii) cultural and artistic content.<br />

46<br />

See Appendix 5: Interim Report: Public Safety Profile Recommendations<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!