Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3: Carnival Public Safety Matrix PRIORITY AREAS/ISSUES WHAT REALLY HAPPENS APPLICABLE LEGISLATION LNHCL/ NHCL MPS BTP WCC RBKC TFL (London Buses) LUL LFEPA SJA LAS ARENAS/ BANDS FUNDRAISING & SPONSORSHIP The event organiser has been the organisation responsible for raising the majority of the sponsorship for Carnival. PROCESSIONAL ROUTE The circular route was originally introduced in 1988 by the MPS. The Current ‘U’ shaped route was proposed by the local authorities and endorsed by the MPS in 2002.. ROUTE ACCESS Although the event organiser has historically been responsible for issuing access permits to the route, the local authorities took over this responsibility in 2002. The police can also override pre-determined entry and exits points. Finally, the decision as to which entry/exit point is used by which band is left solely to the discretion of the band itself. CARNIVAL AREA & SECTORISATION Since the determination of the route also delineates the ‘Carnival Area’, it appears that the MPS and the local authorities are responsible for this. Also, the division of the Carnival Area into ‘sectors’ appears to be part of the Carnival policing strategy. PEDESTRIAN ZONES Again, this is determined by the MPS as part of their Carnival policing strategy. The local authorities are responsible for making the necessary orders. Road Traffic Regulations (Special Events) Act 1994 72
Table 3: Carnival Public Safety Matrix PRIORITY AREAS/ISSUES WHAT REALLY HAPPENS APPLICABLE LEGISLATION LNHCL/ NHCL MPS BTP WCC RBKC TFL (London Buses) LUL LFEPA SJA LAS ARENAS/ BANDS Commissioner’s Regulations SAFETY ZONES/ STERILE AREAS The location of safety zones/sterile areas is determined by the MPS in consultation with the emergency services. BARRIERS The location of police barriers is solely the responsibility of the MPS. TRAFIC MANAGEMENT ORDERS Critical to delineating the Carnival route and area. The local authorities are responsible for issuing the Temporary Traffic Management Orders necessary to close roads in the Carnival area. Officers also conduct pre-event inspections of the carriageway and footpath, initiating any relevant repairs. CROWD MANAGEMENT/ PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT The principal agency responsible for crowd control and pedestrian movement are the MPS (BTP and LUL are responsible for crowd management and movement within and directly outside tube stations). Although the Carnival organiser has historically deployed stewards over the two days of Carnival, their numbers are insufficient to have any real impact on crowd movement and control. ½ STEWARDS Historically, the Carnival organiser has provided 200 stewards at Carnival. With additional funding from the GLA, this was increased in 2001, 2002 and 2003. The Carnival bands also provide volunteer ‘band stewards’ to assist bands to travel around the 73
Page 3 and 4:
Notting Hill Carnival A Strategic R
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Foreword Preface Carnival
Page 7 and 8:
Preface Lee Jasper, Policy Director
Page 9 and 10:
This strategic evaluation was made
Page 11 and 12:
The Challenge: Executive Summary Th
Page 13 and 14:
• recognises the grassroots natur
Page 15 and 16:
provide the level of flexibility re
Page 17 and 18:
• the development of a four-year
Page 19 and 20:
SEU TEZ TfL WCC Social Exclusion Un
Page 21 and 22: and delivering these events has gro
Page 23 and 24: (a) the development of a multi-agen
Page 25 and 26: to commit considerable resources in
Page 27 and 28: (b) establish a Carnival Arts Educa
Page 29 and 30: Introduction The Review Process Und
Page 31 and 32: increase its overall investment in
Page 33 and 34: 1.4.3 the involvement of and consul
Page 35 and 36: 1.11 A third aspect of the Review G
Page 37 and 38: surgery of another Trinidadian, Dr
Page 39 and 40: mobilising strategy, which allowed
Page 41 and 42: ecause the plight of minority ethni
Page 43 and 44: are shown in Figure 1 below as blue
Page 45 and 46: Practice was introduced in 1993, se
Page 47 and 48: 6. It is the responsibility of the
Page 49 and 50: 1.53.2 lack of general awareness of
Page 51 and 52: planning process of Carnival. A key
Page 53 and 54: not be allowed onto the Carnival ro
Page 55 and 56: made available to provide opportuni
Page 57 and 58: 1.76 The role of the media in shapi
Page 59 and 60: Public Safety, Responsibility & Acc
Page 61 and 62: initiate discussions with DCMS, GOL
Page 63 and 64: presented and was unable to provide
Page 65 and 66: The Issue of Public Safety Recommen
Page 67 and 68: 2.4 In the main, whilst these recom
Page 69 and 70: Underground and London Transport pr
Page 71: number key public safety issues and
Page 75 and 76: Table 3: Carnival Public Safety Mat
Page 77 and 78: Table 3: Carnival Public Safety Mat
Page 79 and 80: Stewarding & Route Management at Ca
Page 81 and 82: times, interrupted or delayed. A nu
Page 83 and 84: issues ranging from accommodation,
Page 85 and 86: Crime at Carnival 2.28 Making safe
Page 87 and 88: Event Management and Close Down Tim
Page 89 and 90: number of casualties treated - 598,
Page 91 and 92: • The installation of a temporary
Page 93 and 94: 2.53 In 2000, the circular Carnival
Page 95 and 96: Analysis of Carnival 2001 2.59 In A
Page 97 and 98: Figure (6): Barrier Locations at th
Page 99 and 100: 2.70.3 floats reduce available spac
Page 101 and 102: West-East “Ell” Route: the West
Page 103 and 104: circular route. The lowest route cr
Page 105 and 106: of the Carnival procession would be
Page 107 and 108: Evaluating the Carnival Public Safe
Page 109 and 110: Wider Implications for Major Events
Page 111 and 112: survey evidence on visitor numbers
Page 113 and 114: Independent Strategic Co-ordination
Page 115 and 116: framework for land use and developm
Page 117 and 118: Carnival Management & Leadership In
Page 119 and 120: 19. A clear distinction must be dra
Page 121 and 122: The Coopers & Lybrand Report (1988)
Page 123 and 124:
Table 10: Three-Year Executive Mana
Page 125 and 126:
The Arts Council Review (2001) 3.18
Page 127 and 128:
job description and progression Art
Page 129 and 130:
Carnival - at least in the short to
Page 131 and 132:
The Value of Carnival Funding Carni
Page 133 and 134:
(a) create a new post of Carnival A
Page 135 and 136:
Carnival as Part of a Wider Strateg
Page 137 and 138:
4.7 Held annually on the late May b
Page 139 and 140:
• the first year of the Lambeth S
Page 141 and 142:
The Benefits of Carnival Arts in Te
Page 143 and 144:
carnival art projects. Although it
Page 145 and 146:
esearch that is already available w
Page 147 and 148:
• the key infrastructure and oper
Page 149 and 150:
evenues within the industry are all
Page 151 and 152:
meals and microwaveable snacks mean
Page 153 and 154:
aise sponsorship in 2001 was as a d
Page 155 and 156:
Part V: Future Vision - The Way For
Page 157 and 158:
additional growth-related stresses)
Page 159 and 160:
London Carnival Development Program
Page 161 and 162:
Priority Areas No Key Recommendatio
Page 163 and 164:
Appendix 1 Selected Bibliography Al
Page 165 and 166:
London Arts Board (2000) Making a d
Page 167 and 168:
The Greater London Authority Carniv
Page 169 and 170:
• How could health and safety fac
Page 171 and 172:
Stephen Hotson Area Commander, Brit
Page 173 and 174:
1. We believe that NHCT must be sup
Page 175 and 176:
7. In relation to the content of Ca
Page 177 and 178:
Day/Date Presenters Topic of Discus
Page 179 and 180:
Veteran’’, he has over 35 years
Page 181 and 182:
Goldsmiths College, the Caribbean C
Page 183 and 184:
Appendix 8 The Carnival Code As the
Page 185 and 186:
Notes 187
Page 187:
Notes 189
show all

Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?