Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Notting Hill Carnival Strategic Review - Intelligent Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• providing a smaller circuit for the smaller community bands or those with special<br />
needs;<br />
• increasing live music-making on the <strong>Carnival</strong> route;<br />
• introducing a ‘road march’ competition and encouraging new cultural groups to<br />
take part in the pre-<strong>Carnival</strong> activities and/or the procession.<br />
3.22 It was clear that the <strong>Carnival</strong> arenas were looking to NHCT for leadership in the area of artistic<br />
development, but the review felt that although the trustees had considered developing criteria<br />
for participation, it was “too caught up in the daily fire fighting to develop this vision”. Thus,<br />
the artistic development of the <strong>Carnival</strong> arenas, as distinct from the shaping of the whole<br />
event was something the Arts Council review concluded should remain the responsibility of<br />
the arenas. The report suggested that where possible, the arenas should be strengthened and<br />
given financial independence from NHCT. The long-term aim would be for NHCT to house<br />
the independent arenas under its roof, acting as an umbrella organisation.<br />
Board Management and Personnel<br />
3.23 The Arts Council report acknowledged a pressing need for NHCT to clarify the division of<br />
responsibilities between the board of trustees and the chief executive. It also identified a<br />
reluctance or inability on the part of the board, to self-appraise or acknowledge the existence<br />
of any internal weaknesses within the organisation. The review commented that the trustees<br />
would benefit from a number of away-days, the implementation of a training needs analysis<br />
for all staff and board members and the introduction of an appraisal system, which would help<br />
the organisation to move forward.<br />
Key Recommendations<br />
3.24 The Arts Council’s central recommendations included:<br />
3.24.1 a re-defining and re-focusing of NHCT’s role to that of a co-ordinating agency, taking<br />
responsibility for the overall artistic shaping of the <strong>Notting</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>Carnival</strong>, and providing<br />
a vital service to the <strong>Carnival</strong> disciplines by facilitating the event and the pre-<strong>Carnival</strong><br />
activities (such as the Panorama and the Costume Gala). It was felt that the<br />
redefinition of NHCT’s role as a service provider as opposed to a commercially-driven<br />
business would increase the Trust’s potential;<br />
3.24.2 a complete review by the board of its mission statement and its short, medium and<br />
long-term aims, objectives and priorities, with a view to producing a three-year<br />
strategy for development of the organisation;<br />
3.24.3 a review of the board’s relationship with all the disciplines with a view to ensuring that<br />
all were appropriately represented on the Board;<br />
3.24.4 the urgent need to develop a strong and independent board, with serious<br />
consideration being given to the role of Chair, the most appropriate way to fill this<br />
position and the appropriate length of tenure; and<br />
3.24.5 the regularisation of all staff positions as part of a programme of increased<br />
professionalism. This regularisation would include the review of the Chief Executive’s<br />
129