31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.6. EXAMPLES OF LEVY COPULAS 161<br />

where λ <strong>de</strong>notes the Lebesgue measure on R. Th<strong>en</strong> V F‖ ((a, b]) = µ((a, b]) for any a ≤ b, and<br />

therefore F ‖ is d-increasing. The margins of F have the same form as F , namely<br />

F‖ I ((x i) i∈I ) = min |x i|1 {(−1,...,−1),(1,...,1)} ((sgn x i ) i∈I ) ∏ sgn x i . (4.30)<br />

i∈I<br />

i∈I<br />

Therefore, the one-dim<strong>en</strong>sional margins satisfy F {i} (u) = u.<br />

The first part. L<strong>et</strong> x ∈ (0, ∞) d . Clearly, U(x) ≤ U k (x k ) for any k. On the other hand, since<br />

S is an or<strong>de</strong>red s<strong>et</strong>, we have<br />

{y ∈ R d : x k ≤ y k } ∩ S = {y ∈ R d : x ≤ y} ∩ S<br />

for some k. In<strong>de</strong>ed, suppose that this is not so. Th<strong>en</strong> there exist points z 1 , . . . , z d ∈ S and<br />

indices j 1 , . . . , j d such that zk k ≥ x k and zj k k<br />

< x jk for k = 1, . . . , d. Choose the greatest elem<strong>en</strong>t<br />

among z 1 , . . . , z d (this is possible because they all belong to an or<strong>de</strong>red s<strong>et</strong>) and call it z k .<br />

Th<strong>en</strong> z k j k<br />

< x jk . However, by construction of z 1 , . . . , z d we also have z j k<br />

jk<br />

contradiction to the fact that z k is the greatest elem<strong>en</strong>t. Therefore,<br />

U(x) = min(U 1 (x 1 ), . . . , U d (x d )).<br />

≥ x jk , which is a<br />

Similarly, it can be shown that for every x ∈ (−∞, 0) d ,<br />

U(x) = (−1) d min(|U 1 (x 1 )|, . . . , |U d (x d )|).<br />

Since U(x) = 0 for any x /∈ K, we have shown that<br />

U(x) = F ‖ (U 1 (x 1 ), . . . , U d (x d ))<br />

for any x ∈ (R \ {0}) d . Since the marginal Lévy measures of X are also supported by or<strong>de</strong>red<br />

s<strong>et</strong>s and the margins of F ‖ have the same form as F ‖ , we have<br />

U I ((x i ) i∈I ) = F I ‖ ((U i(x i )) i∈I ) (4.31)<br />

for any I ⊂ {1, . . . , d} and any (x i ) i∈I ∈ (R \ {0}) I .<br />

The converse statem<strong>en</strong>t. L<strong>et</strong> S := supp ν. L<strong>et</strong> us first show that S ⊆ K. Suppose that<br />

this is not so. Th<strong>en</strong> there exists x ∈ S such that for some m and n, x m < 0 and x n > 0 and<br />

for every neighborhood N of x, ν(N) > 0. This implies that U {m,n} (x m /2, x n /2) > 0, which<br />

contradicts Equation (4.31).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!