31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 CHAPTER 2. THE CALIBRATION PROBLEM<br />

where α is a risk-aversion coeffici<strong>en</strong>t. Giv<strong>en</strong> some s<strong>et</strong> of admissible trading strategies Θ, the<br />

utility indiffer<strong>en</strong>ce price p α (c, H) of a claim H for this investor is <strong>de</strong>fined as the solution of the<br />

following equation:<br />

∫<br />

sup E[U α (c + p α (c, H) +<br />

θ∈Θ<br />

(0,T ]<br />

∫<br />

θ u dS u − H)] = sup E[U α (c + θ u dS u )].<br />

θ∈Θ<br />

(0,T ]<br />

Due to the special form (2.16) of the utility function, the initial <strong>en</strong>dowm<strong>en</strong>t c cancels out of the<br />

above equation and we see that<br />

p α (c, H) = p α (0, H) := p α (H).<br />

Using the results in [33], Miyahara and Fujiwara [73] established the following properties of<br />

utility indiffer<strong>en</strong>ce price in expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>ls. Similar results have be<strong>en</strong> obtained by El<br />

Karoui and Rouge [39] in the s<strong>et</strong>ting of continuous processes.<br />

Proposition 2.8. L<strong>et</strong> (X, P ) be a Lévy process such that P ∈ L + B ∩ L NA, and l<strong>et</strong> Q ∗ be the<br />

MEMM <strong>de</strong>fined by (2.13). L<strong>et</strong> S t := e Xt and l<strong>et</strong> Θ inclu<strong>de</strong> all predictable S-integrable processes<br />

θ such that ∫ (0,t] θ udS u is a martingale for each local martingale measure Q, with I(Q|P ) < ∞.<br />

Th<strong>en</strong> the corresponding utility indiffer<strong>en</strong>ce price p α (H) of a boun<strong>de</strong>d claim H has the following<br />

properties:<br />

1. p α (H) ≥ E Q∗ [H] for any α > 0.<br />

2. If 0 < α < β th<strong>en</strong> p α (H) ≤ p β (H).<br />

3. lim α↓0 p α (H) = E Q∗ [H].<br />

The price of a claim H computed un<strong>de</strong>r the MEMM thus turns out to be the highest price<br />

at which all investors with expon<strong>en</strong>tial utility function will be willing to buy this claim.<br />

Kalls<strong>en</strong> [58] <strong>de</strong>fines neutral <strong>de</strong>rivative prices for which the optimal trading strategy consists<br />

in having no conting<strong>en</strong>t claim in one’s portfolio. This approach to valuation in incompl<strong>et</strong>e<br />

mark<strong>et</strong>s corresponds to the notion of fair price introduced by Davis [31]. Kalls<strong>en</strong> further shows<br />

that such prices are unique and correspond to a linear arbitrage-free pricing system, <strong>de</strong>fined<br />

by an equival<strong>en</strong>t martingale measure (neutral pricing measure). If the utility function of an<br />

investor has the form (2.16), the neutral pricing measure coinci<strong>de</strong>s with the minimal <strong>en</strong>tropy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!