31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3. RELATIVE ENTROPY IN THE LITERATURE 73<br />

Theorem 2.7. L<strong>et</strong> P be a Lévy process with characteristic tripl<strong>et</strong> (A, ν, γ). If there exists a<br />

constant β ∈ R such that<br />

∫<br />

{x>1}<br />

γ +<br />

e x e β(ex −1) ν(dx) < ∞, (2.14)<br />

( 1<br />

2 + β )<br />

A +<br />

∫<br />

|x|≤1<br />

{<br />

} ∫<br />

(e x − 1)e β(ex−1) − x ν(dx) + (e x − 1)e β(ex−1) ν(dx) = 0,<br />

|x|>1<br />

th<strong>en</strong> there exists a minimal <strong>en</strong>tropy martingale measure Q ∗ with the following properties:<br />

1. The measure Q ∗ corresponds to a Lévy process: Q ∗ ∈ L with characteristic tripl<strong>et</strong><br />

A ∗ = A,<br />

ν ∗ (dx) = e β(ex−1) ν(dx),<br />

∫<br />

γ ∗ = γ + βA + x(e β(ex−1) − 1)ν(dx).<br />

|x|≤1<br />

2. The measure Q ∗ is an equival<strong>en</strong>t martingale measure: Q ∗ ∼ P .<br />

3. The minimal relative <strong>en</strong>tropy is giv<strong>en</strong> by<br />

{ ∫ β ∞<br />

}<br />

I(Q ∗ |P ) = −T<br />

2 (1 + β)A + βγ + {e β(ex−1) − 1 − βx1 |x|≤1 }ν(dx) . (2.15)<br />

−∞<br />

Remark 2.1. It is easy to show, along the lines of the proof of Proposition 1.8, that condition<br />

(2.14) is satisfied, in particular, if P ∈ L NA ∩ L + B<br />

for some B > 0, which corresponds to a stock<br />

price process with jumps boun<strong>de</strong>d from above in a mark<strong>et</strong> without arbitrage opportunity.<br />

Since large positive jumps do not happ<strong>en</strong> very oft<strong>en</strong> in real mark<strong>et</strong>s, (2.14) turns out to be<br />

much less restrictive (and easier to check) than the g<strong>en</strong>eral hypotheses in [42]. This shows that<br />

the notion of MEMM is especially useful and conv<strong>en</strong>i<strong>en</strong>t in the context of expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

In addition to its computational tractability, the interest of the minimal <strong>en</strong>tropy martingale<br />

measure is due to its economic interpr<strong>et</strong>ation as the pricing measure that corresponds to the<br />

limit of utility indiffer<strong>en</strong>ce price for the expon<strong>en</strong>tial utility function wh<strong>en</strong> the risk aversion<br />

coeffici<strong>en</strong>t t<strong>en</strong>ds to zero. Consi<strong>de</strong>r an investor with initial <strong>en</strong>dowm<strong>en</strong>t c, whose utility function<br />

is giv<strong>en</strong> by<br />

U α (x) := 1 − e −αx , (2.16)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!