31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.1. PARAMETRIC FAMILIES 167<br />

The applications of Lévy copulas are not limited to constructing expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />

Lévy copula mo<strong>de</strong>ls can be time changed to obtain multidim<strong>en</strong>sional analogs of stochastic<br />

volatility mo<strong>de</strong>ls discussed in [22]. More g<strong>en</strong>erally, since a large class of Markov processes or<br />

ev<strong>en</strong> semimartingales behaves locally as a Lévy process in the s<strong>en</strong>se that its dynamics can be<br />

<strong>de</strong>scribed by a drift rate, a covariance matrix, and a Lévy measure, which may all change<br />

randomly through time (cf. e.g. [54], II.2.9, II.4.19), Lévy copulas could be used to <strong>de</strong>scribe<br />

<strong>de</strong>p<strong>en</strong><strong>de</strong>nce b<strong>et</strong>we<strong>en</strong> processes of these types.<br />

5.1 Param<strong>et</strong>ric families of Lévy copulas<br />

Our first result is a m<strong>et</strong>hod to construct Lévy copulas on [0, ∞] d from ordinary copulas.<br />

Theorem 5.1 (Construction of Lévy copulas from ordinary copulas). L<strong>et</strong> C be a copula<br />

on [0, 1] d and φ : [0, 1] → [0, ∞] be a strictly increasing continuous function with φ(1) = ∞,<br />

φ(0) = 0, having nonnegative <strong>de</strong>rivatives of or<strong>de</strong>rs up to d on (0, 1). Th<strong>en</strong><br />

F (u 1 , . . . , u d ) := φ(C(φ −1 (u 1 ), . . . , φ −1 (u d )))<br />

is a Lévy copula on [0, ∞] d .<br />

Proof. First, note that φ −1 is well <strong>de</strong>fined and satisfies φ −1 (0) = 0 and φ −1 (∞) = 1. Therefore,<br />

properties 1 and 2 of Definition 4.14 are clear, and in view of Equation (4.5), property 4 also<br />

holds. It remains to show that F is a d-increasing function, and since φ −1 is strictly increasing,<br />

it suffices to prove that the function φ(C(u 1 , . . . , u d )) is d-increasing on [0, 1] d .<br />

To this <strong>en</strong>d, l<strong>et</strong> us show by induction on d that if H : [0, 1] d → [0, 1] is d-increasing and<br />

groun<strong>de</strong>d and ψ : [0, 1] → [0, ∞] is a continuous increasing function with ψ(0) = 0 and positive<br />

<strong>de</strong>rivatives of or<strong>de</strong>rs up to d on (0, 1) th<strong>en</strong> ψ(H) is also d-increasing and groun<strong>de</strong>d. For d = 1,<br />

the result is clear. Suppose d ≥ 2. For k = 1, . . . , d l<strong>et</strong> a k , b k ∈ [0, 1] with a k ≤ b k . The function<br />

˜H(u 2 , . . . , u d ) := ψ(H(b 1 , u 2 , . . . , u d )) − ψ(H(a 1 , u 2 , . . . , u d )) satisfies<br />

V ψ(H) (|a 1 , b 1 | × · · · × |a d , b d |) = V ˜H(|a 2 , b 2 | × · · · × |a d , b d |),<br />

h<strong>en</strong>ce, it remains to prove that ˜H is d − 1-increasing. It can be repres<strong>en</strong>ted as follows (“∗”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!