31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 CHAPTER 2. THE CALIBRATION PROBLEM<br />

2.1.1 Lack of i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

If the data are consist<strong>en</strong>t with an expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>l and call option prices are known for<br />

one maturity and all strikes, the characteristic tripl<strong>et</strong> of the un<strong>de</strong>rlying Lévy process could be<br />

<strong>de</strong>duced in the following way:<br />

• Compute the characteristic function Φ T<br />

Equation (1.24).<br />

of log stock price by Fourier transform as in<br />

• Deduce the unit variance of the Gaussian compon<strong>en</strong>t A and the Lévy measure ν from the<br />

characteristic function Φ T . First, A can be found as follows (see [87, page 40]):<br />

Now, <strong>de</strong>noting ψ(u) ≡ log Φ T (u)<br />

T<br />

∫ 1<br />

−1<br />

A = lim<br />

u→∞ −2 log Φ T (u)<br />

T u 2 (2.5)<br />

+ Au2<br />

2<br />

, it can be shown (see Equation (8.10) in [87]) that<br />

∫ ∞<br />

(ψ(u) − ψ(u + z))dz = 2<br />

−∞<br />

e iux (1 − sin x )ν(dx) (2.6)<br />

x<br />

Therefore, the left-hand si<strong>de</strong> of (2.6) is the Fourier transform of the positive finite measure<br />

2(1 − sin x<br />

x<br />

)ν(dx). This means that this measure, and, consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, the Lévy measure ν<br />

is uniquely <strong>de</strong>termined by ψ.<br />

However, call prices are only available for a finite number of strikes. This number may be quite<br />

small (b<strong>et</strong>we<strong>en</strong> 10 and 40 in real examples). Therefore, the above procedure cannot be applied<br />

and ν and A must be computed by minimizing the pricing error ‖C M − C Q ‖ 2 w. Giv<strong>en</strong> that<br />

the number of calibration constraints (option prices) is finite and not very large, there may be<br />

many Lévy tripl<strong>et</strong>s which reproduce call prices with equal precision. This means that the error<br />

landscape may have flat regions in which the error has a low s<strong>en</strong>sitivity to variations in A and<br />

ν.<br />

One may think that in a param<strong>et</strong>ric mo<strong>de</strong>l with few param<strong>et</strong>ers one will not <strong>en</strong>counter this<br />

problem since there are (many) more options than param<strong>et</strong>ers. This is not true, as illustrated by<br />

the following empirical example. Figure 2.1 repres<strong>en</strong>ts the magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the quadratic pricing<br />

error for the Merton mo<strong>de</strong>l (1.16) on a data s<strong>et</strong> of DAX in<strong>de</strong>x options, as a function of the<br />

diffusion coeffici<strong>en</strong>t σ and the jump int<strong>en</strong>sity λ, other param<strong>et</strong>ers remaining fixed. It can be<br />

observed that if one increases the diffusion volatility while simultaneously <strong>de</strong>creasing the jump

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!