Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...
Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...
Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.2. CHOICE OF THE PRIOR 99<br />
Since φ ′ n are boun<strong>de</strong>d in L ∞ norm uniformly on n, φ ′ n log φ ′ n is also boun<strong>de</strong>d and the dominated<br />
converg<strong>en</strong>ce theorem implies that lim n I(Q φ ′ n<br />
|P ) = I(Q φ |P ). Passing to the limit in (3.8), we<br />
obtain that this inequality holds for every φ ∈ L 1 (P ) ∩ L ∞ (P ) with φ ≥ 0 and E P [φ] = 1.<br />
L<strong>et</strong> us now choose a nonnegative φ ∈ L 1 (P ) with E P [φ] = 1. If I(Q φ |P ) = ∞ th<strong>en</strong> surely<br />
(3.8) holds, therefore we can suppose I(Q φ |P ) < ∞. L<strong>et</strong> φ n = φ ∧ n. Th<strong>en</strong> φ n → φ in L 1 (P )<br />
because<br />
∫<br />
‖φ n − φ‖ L 1 ≤<br />
φ≥n<br />
∫<br />
φdP =<br />
φ≥n<br />
D<strong>en</strong>oting φ ′ n := φ n /E P [φ n ] as above, we obtain that<br />
φ log φ<br />
log φ dP ≤ I(Q φ|P )<br />
log n → 0.<br />
lim<br />
n<br />
‖C Q φ ′ n − C M ‖ 2 w = ‖C Q φ<br />
− C M ‖ 2 w<br />
Since, for a suffici<strong>en</strong>tly large n, |φ n (x) log φ n (x)| ≤ |φ(x) log φ(x)|, we can once again apply the<br />
dominated converg<strong>en</strong>ce theorem:<br />
∫<br />
lim φ ′<br />
n<br />
n log φ ′ 1<br />
ndP =<br />
lim n E P [φ n ] lim n<br />
∫<br />
∫<br />
φ n log φ n dP − lim log E P [φ n ] =<br />
n<br />
φ log φdP<br />
Therefore, by passage to the limit, (3.8) holds for all φ ∈ L 1 (P ) with φ ≥ 0 and E P [φ] = 1,<br />
which compl<strong>et</strong>es the proof of the theorem.<br />
To approximate numerically the solution of the calibration problem (2.27) with a giv<strong>en</strong> prior<br />
P , we need to construct, using Lemma 3.1, an approximating sequ<strong>en</strong>ce {P n } of Lévy processes<br />
with atomic measures such that P n ⇒ P . The sequ<strong>en</strong>ce {Q n } of solutions corresponding to this<br />
sequ<strong>en</strong>ce of priors will converge (in the s<strong>en</strong>se of Theorem 3.2) to a solution of the calibration<br />
problem with prior P .<br />
3.2 Choice of the prior Lévy process<br />
The prior Lévy process must, g<strong>en</strong>erally speaking, reflect the user’s view of the mo<strong>de</strong>l. It is<br />
one of the most important ingredi<strong>en</strong>ts of the calibration m<strong>et</strong>hod and cannot be <strong>de</strong>termined<br />
compl<strong>et</strong>ely automatically because the choice of the prior has a strong influ<strong>en</strong>ce on the outcome<br />
of the calibration. The user should therefore specify a characteristic tripl<strong>et</strong> (A P , ν P , γ P ) of<br />
the prior P . A natural solution, justified by the economic consi<strong>de</strong>rations of Section 2.3 is<br />
to take the historical probability, resulting from statistical estimation of an expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy