31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2. CHOICE OF THE PRIOR 99<br />

Since φ ′ n are boun<strong>de</strong>d in L ∞ norm uniformly on n, φ ′ n log φ ′ n is also boun<strong>de</strong>d and the dominated<br />

converg<strong>en</strong>ce theorem implies that lim n I(Q φ ′ n<br />

|P ) = I(Q φ |P ). Passing to the limit in (3.8), we<br />

obtain that this inequality holds for every φ ∈ L 1 (P ) ∩ L ∞ (P ) with φ ≥ 0 and E P [φ] = 1.<br />

L<strong>et</strong> us now choose a nonnegative φ ∈ L 1 (P ) with E P [φ] = 1. If I(Q φ |P ) = ∞ th<strong>en</strong> surely<br />

(3.8) holds, therefore we can suppose I(Q φ |P ) < ∞. L<strong>et</strong> φ n = φ ∧ n. Th<strong>en</strong> φ n → φ in L 1 (P )<br />

because<br />

∫<br />

‖φ n − φ‖ L 1 ≤<br />

φ≥n<br />

∫<br />

φdP =<br />

φ≥n<br />

D<strong>en</strong>oting φ ′ n := φ n /E P [φ n ] as above, we obtain that<br />

φ log φ<br />

log φ dP ≤ I(Q φ|P )<br />

log n → 0.<br />

lim<br />

n<br />

‖C Q φ ′ n − C M ‖ 2 w = ‖C Q φ<br />

− C M ‖ 2 w<br />

Since, for a suffici<strong>en</strong>tly large n, |φ n (x) log φ n (x)| ≤ |φ(x) log φ(x)|, we can once again apply the<br />

dominated converg<strong>en</strong>ce theorem:<br />

∫<br />

lim φ ′<br />

n<br />

n log φ ′ 1<br />

ndP =<br />

lim n E P [φ n ] lim n<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

φ n log φ n dP − lim log E P [φ n ] =<br />

n<br />

φ log φdP<br />

Therefore, by passage to the limit, (3.8) holds for all φ ∈ L 1 (P ) with φ ≥ 0 and E P [φ] = 1,<br />

which compl<strong>et</strong>es the proof of the theorem.<br />

To approximate numerically the solution of the calibration problem (2.27) with a giv<strong>en</strong> prior<br />

P , we need to construct, using Lemma 3.1, an approximating sequ<strong>en</strong>ce {P n } of Lévy processes<br />

with atomic measures such that P n ⇒ P . The sequ<strong>en</strong>ce {Q n } of solutions corresponding to this<br />

sequ<strong>en</strong>ce of priors will converge (in the s<strong>en</strong>se of Theorem 3.2) to a solution of the calibration<br />

problem with prior P .<br />

3.2 Choice of the prior Lévy process<br />

The prior Lévy process must, g<strong>en</strong>erally speaking, reflect the user’s view of the mo<strong>de</strong>l. It is<br />

one of the most important ingredi<strong>en</strong>ts of the calibration m<strong>et</strong>hod and cannot be <strong>de</strong>termined<br />

compl<strong>et</strong>ely automatically because the choice of the prior has a strong influ<strong>en</strong>ce on the outcome<br />

of the calibration. The user should therefore specify a characteristic tripl<strong>et</strong> (A P , ν P , γ P ) of<br />

the prior P . A natural solution, justified by the economic consi<strong>de</strong>rations of Section 2.3 is<br />

to take the historical probability, resulting from statistical estimation of an expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!