31.05.2014 Views

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 CHAPTER 2. THE CALIBRATION PROBLEM<br />

be introduced into the problem by specifying a prior mo<strong>de</strong>l: we suppose giv<strong>en</strong> a Lévy process<br />

P and look for the solution of the problem (2.4) that has the smallest relative <strong>en</strong>tropy with<br />

respect to P . For two probabilities P and Q on the same measurable space (Ω, F), the relative<br />

<strong>en</strong>tropy of Q with respect to P is <strong>de</strong>fined by<br />

⎧ [ ]<br />

⎨ E P dQ dQ<br />

dP<br />

log<br />

dP<br />

, if Q ≪ P,<br />

I(Q|P ) =<br />

⎩<br />

∞, otherwise,<br />

(2.10)<br />

where by conv<strong>en</strong>tion x log x = 0 wh<strong>en</strong> x = 0. For a time horizon T ≤ T ∞ we <strong>de</strong>fine I T (Q|P ) :=<br />

I(Q| FT |P | FT ).<br />

Minimum <strong>en</strong>tropy least squares calibration problem<br />

Giv<strong>en</strong> prices C M of call options<br />

and a prior Lévy process P , find a least squares solution Q ∗ ∈ Q LS , such that<br />

I(Q ∗ |P ) =<br />

inf I(Q|P ). (2.11)<br />

Q∈QLS In the sequel, any such Q ∗ will be called a minimum <strong>en</strong>tropy least squares solution (MELSS)<br />

and the s<strong>et</strong> of all such solutions will be <strong>de</strong>noted by Q MELS .<br />

The prior probability P must reflect our a priori knowledge about the risk-neutral distribution<br />

of the un<strong>de</strong>rlying. A natural choice of prior, <strong>en</strong>suring abs<strong>en</strong>ce of arbitrage in the calibrated<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>l, is an expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>l, estimated from the time series of r<strong>et</strong>urns. The effect of<br />

the choice of prior on the solution of the calibration problem and the possible ways to choose<br />

it in practice are discussed in Section 3.2.<br />

Using relative <strong>en</strong>tropy for selection of solutions removes, to some ext<strong>en</strong>t, the i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />

problem of least-squares calibration. Whereas in the least squares case, this was an important<br />

nuisance, now, if two measures reproduce mark<strong>et</strong> option prices with the same precision and have<br />

the same <strong>en</strong>tropic distance to the prior, this means that both measures are compatible with all<br />

the available information. Knowledge of many such probability measures instead of one may be<br />

se<strong>en</strong> as an advantage, because it allows to estimate mo<strong>de</strong>l risk and provi<strong>de</strong> confi<strong>de</strong>nce intervals<br />

for the prices of exotic options. However, the calibration problem (2.11) remains ill-posed: since<br />

the minimization of <strong>en</strong>tropy is done over the results of least squares calibration, problem (2.11)<br />

may only admit a solution if problem (2.4) does. Also, Q LS is not necessarily a compact s<strong>et</strong>,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!