Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...
Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...
Processus de Lévy en Finance - Laboratoire de Probabilités et ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
58 CHAPTER 2. THE CALIBRATION PROBLEM<br />
Calibration problem for data, consist<strong>en</strong>t with exp-Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>l.<br />
of call options {C M (T i , K i )} i∈I , find Q ∗ ∈ M ∩ L, such that<br />
Giv<strong>en</strong> mark<strong>et</strong> prices<br />
∀i ∈ I, C Q∗ (T i , K i ) = C M (T i , K i ). (2.1)<br />
In most cases, however, Equations (2.1) cannot be solved exactly, either because the observed<br />
option prices contain errors or because the mark<strong>et</strong> in question cannot be <strong>de</strong>scribed by an<br />
expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>l. In this case a common practice is to replace the exact constraints<br />
(2.1) by a nonlinear least squares calibration problem. Section 2.1 takes a critical look at<br />
this approach and establishes some limits of its applicability to non-param<strong>et</strong>ric calibration of<br />
expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>ls.<br />
An important difficulty of least squares calibration is its lack of i<strong>de</strong>ntification, meaning<br />
that a finite number of observed option prices does not allow to reconstruct the law of a Lévy<br />
process in a unique fashion. To address this issue, we suggest, in Section 2.2 to reformulate<br />
the calibration problem as that of finding the risk-neutral expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>l that has the<br />
smallest relative <strong>en</strong>tropy with respect to a giv<strong>en</strong> prior probability measure among all solutions<br />
of the least squares calibration problem. Section 2.3 reviews the literature on the use of relative<br />
<strong>en</strong>tropy for pricing and calibration and places the pres<strong>en</strong>t study into the context of previous<br />
work on this subject.<br />
The use of relative <strong>en</strong>tropy for selection of solutions removes to some ext<strong>en</strong>t the i<strong>de</strong>ntification<br />
problem but the resulting calibration problem is still ill-posed: small errors in mark<strong>et</strong> data may<br />
lead to large changes of its solution. The last section of this chapter uses the m<strong>et</strong>hod of<br />
regularization to approximate the solutions of this problem in a stable manner in pres<strong>en</strong>ce of<br />
data errors.<br />
2.1 Least squares calibration<br />
Wh<strong>en</strong> the mark<strong>et</strong> data is not consist<strong>en</strong>t with the class of expon<strong>en</strong>tial Lévy mo<strong>de</strong>ls, the exact<br />
calibration problem may not have a solution. In this case one may consi<strong>de</strong>r an approximate<br />
solution: instead of reproducing the mark<strong>et</strong> option prices exactly, one may look for a Lévy tripl<strong>et</strong><br />
which reproduces them in the best possible way in the least squares s<strong>en</strong>se. L<strong>et</strong> w be a probability