04.06.2014 Views

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Irving approached the Indians in the same manner in which he approached the small towns of upstate New<br />

York. He wrote about them as a conservative lamenting the loss of a way of life. His writing depicted the<br />

Indians as patriotic republicans and implied that the Indians contributed to American tradition and identity<br />

just as did the quirky characters of small-town New York.<br />

Because Irving saw the Indians as fellow Americans he condemned the Jacksonian removal policies.<br />

In a letter to his sister on the Indians, Irving wrote, “I find it extremely difficult even when so near the seat<br />

of action to get at the right story of these feuds between the white and the red men, and my sympathies go<br />

strongly with the latter.” (Pierre Irving, Vol. 3, 38). The Traits of Indian Character expresses his view in<br />

greater detail:<br />

It has been the lot of the unfortunate aborigines of America, in early periods of colonization<br />

to be doubly wronged by the white men. They have been dispossessed of their hereditary<br />

possessions by mercenary and frequently wanton warfare; and their characters have been<br />

traduced by bigoted and interested writers . . . the rights of the savage have seldom been<br />

appreciated or respected by the white man. (Washington Irving, History, Tales, and Sketches,<br />

1002).<br />

For a man who was known as “the embodiment of goodwill towards men” words such as, “bigoted” and<br />

accusations such as “interested” should strike the reader as strong and almost out of character. This<br />

response, however, reflects Irving’s expressed desire to, “penetrate the gathering film of misanthropy.”<br />

(Curtis, 69-70). The American treatment of the Indians offended his kindly view of them as fellow humans.<br />

His anger at fellow writers demonstrates his disgust that the writer’s profession had been turned to so<br />

uncharitable a use. For a man deeply devoted to the traditions of the past, “dispossessing” someone of their<br />

“hereditary possessions” meant destroying what Irving would have seen as one of the dearest possessions of a<br />

human being. For Irving the American treatment of the Indians ran in the face of the three things that<br />

animated his life — love of his fellow humans, writing, and tradition.<br />

In the face of such a condemnation of the Indian policy Irving’s agreement to accompany Captain<br />

Ellsworth on a government tour for the express purpose of removing the Indians poses a problem. Andrew<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!