04.06.2014 Views

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Elyse Nelmark<br />

Central Michigan <strong>University</strong><br />

Crusades of Past and Present:<br />

Exploring Destructive and Life Affirming Action in Religion<br />

On May 5, 2003, Southern Christian Missionary leader Albert Mohler and Professor of<br />

Comparative Religion, Charles Kimball, appeared on National Public Radio‟s “Fresh Air.” Albert Mohler<br />

spoke with enthusiasm on the prospect of Christian missionaries taking the Gospel to the Middle East.<br />

Kimball was concerned such an action might appear to Iraqis to be another crusade the West was bringing<br />

to the East. In 1095, the “God wills it” message inspired people to march as holy warriors to Jerusalem<br />

under the banner of the cross where they would kill Muslims, Jews, and Orthodox Christians. The<br />

memory of the Crusades is still a sensitive subject for those in the present day Middle East, according to<br />

Kimball. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, Bush made a grave mistake in his choice of terms, where he<br />

described the soon-to-be war on terrorism as a “crusade.” He apologized for this remark after the statement<br />

caused global outrage. As someone studying both English and Religion, these issues surrounding the<br />

Crusades, and the word „crusade‟ itself, fascinated me. I researched the development of the word<br />

„crusade‟, with the help of the Oxford English Dictionary. The term „crusade,‟ as it has been understood and<br />

used historically, can mean “any war instigated and blessed by the Church for alleged religious ends …<br />

against infidels or heretics.” However, language develops, and a crusade, in the modern sense, can be used<br />

to describe, “An aggressive movement or enterprise against some public evil, or some institution or class of<br />

persons considered as evil.” The complexity and sensitivity surrounding the word „crusade‟ illustrates how<br />

language can be used to express both destructive or life affirming action. We should be on guard for how<br />

terms such as a „crusade‟, or even „patriot‟ or „hero‟ are used, and that these terms are not used in political<br />

and religious rhetoric to legitimize destructive behavior. A crusade can include life-affirming behavior, and<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!