04.06.2014 Views

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Because Boethius is presenting the Consolation as a philosophical, rather than religious, text, he allows for<br />

men, through philosophical reflection, to “be gods,” or in other words, to attain a transcendent form of<br />

divinity. On the other hand, Alfred’s interpretation of this passage centers around God as the source of all<br />

goods, rather than man’s ability to achieve a god-like divinity. Alfred writes, “Yet there is only one God; he<br />

is the stem and base of all forms of good; from Him these forms all come, and to Him they return, and He<br />

ruleth all. Though He is the beginning and foundation of all good men and all good things, yet the forms of<br />

good that issue from him are many” (Alfred 73). Alfred is more concerned with the concept of humility and<br />

obedience, for both God and secular leaders such as himself. Because Alfred wants to maintain God as the<br />

ultimate and all-powerful ruler over Christendom, he must necessarily alter Boethius’ more liberal and<br />

philosophical statement that men can achieve divinity. For Alfred, God is not only the “stem” and “base” of<br />

all goods but also the omnipotent governor over the Christian world. In order for God’s subjects to achieve<br />

happiness, they must practice obedience and self-restraint rather than attempt to achieve personal divinity,<br />

and this is the same obedience and self-restraint that Alfred knows is necessary in order for his own Anglo-<br />

Saxon kingdom to achieve and maintain political stability.<br />

In the final chapter of Alfred’s Consolation, he takes perhaps the greatest license in his translation of<br />

the Boethian work. In Boethius’ version, Lady Philosophy finishes the discourse with an explanation of how<br />

God observes the world through his foreknowledge and she also presents a short, if abrupt, summary of her<br />

previous commentary. Lady Philosophy asserts, “God continually observes with foreknowledge all things<br />

from on high, and his eternal<br />

vision, which is ever in the present… dispenses rewards to the good and<br />

punishments to the wicked… So avoid vices, cultivate virtues, raise your minds to righteous hopes, pour<br />

out your humble prayers to heaven” (Boethius 114). Lady Philosophy discusses God much as she did<br />

throughout the text, namely as the observer from on high and the divine power that can lead men to good.<br />

In this text, it is crucial that God is an entity that “observes” rather than rules from on high because it is<br />

Boethius’ aim to employ the concept of God primarily as a force of divine good. He makes this concept<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!