04.06.2014 Views

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In an article published during the war by Jean-Paul Sartre, he is less than supportive of France’s<br />

efforts and speaks out strongly against colonization and torture as a whole. Sartre criticizes the methods<br />

used in Algeria, comparing the French military to the Nazis; the French, he says, found it impossible to<br />

come to terms with, let alone understand, the German occupation and the atrocities of the concentration<br />

camps, yet when the French government turned to Algeria, having occupied it for a century, the French<br />

turned a blind eye to the horrors brought upon the Algerians (88). Algerians, Sartre argues, were every bit<br />

as human as the French and deserved to be treated as such (93). Sharing Sartre’s disgust for the French<br />

torture methods was Simone de Beauvoir, who recounts the story of Djemila Boupacha, an indigenous<br />

woman working with the FLN. In addition to the torture, de Beauvoir discusses the absence of Boupacha’s<br />

lawyer during her trial, another citizen’s right which was denied to her (5). Djebar also mentions the<br />

torture she knew was taking place during the war, but describes more vividly the death of her husband at<br />

the hands of the French army; he was put on a post in the middle of Ouled Larbi, a village southeast of<br />

Algiers. He was then executed publicly (Djebar 232). A similar execution is shown in the film Battle of<br />

Algiers when a prisoner is taken outside the prison walls, closed off from the public but visible from the<br />

prisoners’ windows, and led to the guillotine. The French government supplemented individual executions<br />

with covert bombings; government officials gained access to Algerian housing settlements where they<br />

suspected FLN members to be living and planted bombs accordingly. Perhaps an even greater injustice,<br />

certainly a greater betrayal of loyalty, was shown to the indigenous French-Algerians who chose to fight<br />

with the French army, against their own countrymen. Known as “harkis,” these French-Algerian soldiers<br />

were promised protection from the Algerian government should the French lose the war, but the French<br />

government was able to provide neither adequate security, nor safe passage from Algeria to France after the<br />

war. As a result, these soldiers were left in Algeria and executed for their treachery (Virtue).<br />

The manner in which both Sartre and de Beauvoir respond alludes to the severity and,<br />

correspondingly, the disgust with which much of the French public responded. Others however, regarded<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!