04.06.2014 Views

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

Volu m e II - Purdue University Calumet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EU and NATO as a method for stabilizing Central and Eastern Europe. NATO, a remnant of the Cold<br />

War, has transformed itself to deal with new threats to European security, but Russia continues to view it<br />

as a hostile force directed against Russia (“Where Does Europe End?” 178). In 2004, a massive increase in<br />

NATO membership to include Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia greatly<br />

upset Russia, particularly the admission of the three Baltic States which had been Soviet states, and not just<br />

part of the former Soviet sphere of influence (Åslund 2).<br />

In 2008, when Ukraine and Georgia requested NATO membership action plans (MAP), which<br />

would have laid out a series of steps to be taken in order to become NATO members, Russia’s response<br />

became even more volatile. A speech given by Putin suggested that he was questioning the legitimacy of the<br />

breakup of the Soviet Union and the sovereignty of the resulting states. He said, “If the NATO issue is<br />

added there, along with other problems, this may bring into question Ukraine’s existence as a sovereign<br />

state.” While this response is quite reactionary, the motivation behind it and the perceived threat to<br />

Russian security as NATO and the EU move closer to Russia’s borders need to be taken into account.<br />

Russia also clearly questioned the sovereignty of Georgia, as it intervened and then recognized South<br />

Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states (Åslund 7). At the NATO Summit in Bucharest, the allies<br />

decided not to give Ukraine and Georgia a MAP, but indicated that they would contemplate the future<br />

membership of the two states. This rather ambiguous message was given due to the disagreement between<br />

NATO members as to whether or not Ukraine and Georgia should be given a MAP, supported by the<br />

United States, but much more cautiously by many European NATO member states who were concerned<br />

with Russia’s possible response and the ability of Georgia and Ukraine to meet the requirements for joining<br />

NATO (Lazarevic 45-46). While some of Russia’s security concerns may be understandable, Russia’s<br />

apparent disregard for the sovereignty of many former Soviet states is very concerning for European<br />

security.<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!