03.11.2014 Views

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Panel 6 – social SCIENCEs<br />

<strong>the</strong> Centre has a handicap because it does not provide a PhD programme<br />

with <strong>the</strong> aim to produce researchers in <strong>the</strong> field. The question is whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> Centre has capacities enough to fulfil requirements for such a programme.<br />

Again, an institutional alliance with IR at <strong>the</strong> Department of<br />

Political Science could be <strong>the</strong> solution giving benefits to both departments.<br />

Results will not come automatically, and <strong>the</strong> Centre needs to have<br />

enough teaching resources in order to reach a suitable balance in <strong>the</strong> division<br />

of labour between <strong>the</strong> departments. A joint PhD programme could,<br />

if successful, be a sustainable base for internal researcher recruitment.<br />

10.3 Future potentials and possibilities<br />

The interdisciplinary profile of <strong>the</strong> Centre is necessarily not a problem if a<br />

closer collaboration with IR at <strong>the</strong> Department of Political Science will be<br />

enhanced. In fact, <strong>the</strong> IR network is interdisciplinary as well. In addition,<br />

following <strong>the</strong> official statement of <strong>the</strong> Copenhagen based Nordic Institute<br />

of Asian Studies (NISA); <strong>the</strong>y collaborate actively with universities<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Öresund region. However, nothing is mentioned about NISA in<br />

<strong>the</strong> self evaluation form. It might be a lapse, but if not, <strong>the</strong>n this matter<br />

must be seen as a problem. Again <strong>the</strong> Öresund collaboration must be<br />

highlighted as <strong>the</strong> natural base for international cooperation and which<br />

can give strength and enough critical mass for research and teaching. At<br />

present, <strong>the</strong> plan ranks good.<br />

10.4 Gender and equal opportunity issues<br />

The gender balance at <strong>the</strong> Centre is not equally fulfilled. A man (<strong>the</strong> professor)<br />

is <strong>the</strong> chair of <strong>the</strong> Centre, whereas three out of four researchers are<br />

female. Added toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is a slight female majority but in terms of<br />

positions in <strong>the</strong> hierarchy, <strong>the</strong>re is not. Given <strong>the</strong> small size of <strong>the</strong> Centre,<br />

possibilities at <strong>the</strong> moment are practically non-existent to make a career<br />

in <strong>the</strong> organisation. Positions as lecturers could be an option to create,<br />

given that resources are provided. Shared lecturers with <strong>the</strong> department<br />

of Political Science is ano<strong>the</strong>r, or why not take <strong>the</strong> train to Copenhagen<br />

and negotiate a common strategy.<br />

11. Centre for European Studies (CFE)<br />

11.1 Overall assessment:<br />

CFE is a coordinating centre for promoting research on Europe, connecting<br />

scholars within <strong>the</strong> faculties of social sciences, humanities, economy<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!