03.11.2014 Views

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Panel 8 – medicine | clinical<br />

much as <strong>the</strong>y act as co-authors in general with respect to <strong>the</strong>rapy-related<br />

trials. Considering <strong>the</strong> publication list of <strong>the</strong> professor (Alvegård), this<br />

is directly related to his names on <strong>the</strong> papers. For <strong>the</strong> publication list<br />

provided by principle investigator senior lecturer Andersson, his name<br />

is lacking from many of <strong>the</strong> publications, suggesting junior assistants<br />

acting in <strong>the</strong> team may be co-authors. Yet, no information on this issue is<br />

provided. As such, it is difficult to provide direct rating of <strong>the</strong> quality of<br />

<strong>the</strong> research work in as much as <strong>the</strong>y seem to act more as consultants to<br />

<strong>the</strong> work of o<strong>the</strong>rs. Importantly, however, <strong>the</strong> unit does not stand out as<br />

an independent epidemiological unit with an independent profile; thus,<br />

<strong>the</strong> term “insufficient” may apply.<br />

Future potential and possibilities: With <strong>the</strong> two team-leaders approaching<br />

retirement age, it is an open question whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Unit<br />

of Cancer Epidemiology should stay as a separate unit or ra<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>the</strong><br />

positions should be allocated into a larger unit handling epidemiology or<br />

statistical consultancy. As <strong>the</strong> unit is functioning now, it seems to act as<br />

a statistical consultant unit to clinicians. They list a number of collaborations<br />

to Scandinavian and Swedish Research Organisations, and <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

no reason to believe this has not worked to <strong>the</strong> satisfaction of both parts.<br />

Yet, <strong>the</strong> activity does not qualify for a separate unit term “cancer epidemiology”,<br />

in as much as <strong>the</strong>y are not dealing with epidemiology as an issue<br />

on its own. We believe a re-structuring of <strong>the</strong> unit with translocation of<br />

positions may be a solution for <strong>the</strong> next upcoming years.<br />

2.24 Electron Microscopy<br />

Overall assessment: The Electron Microscopy unit was formed more<br />

than 20 years ago as a service facility for research performed in collaboration<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r groups. It is not understandable why a new unit<br />

of research for electron microscopy should be positioned within <strong>the</strong><br />

Department of Clinical Sciences and not within Experimental Medicine.<br />

A restructuring should be considered after <strong>the</strong> retirement of <strong>the</strong> Head of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Unit.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> present stage research of this unit can only be evaluated as being<br />

poor or insufficient.<br />

Research infrastructure: The unit is equipped with state-of-<strong>the</strong>-art<br />

electron microscopy facilities and is processing a large variety of samples.<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!