03.11.2014 Views

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Panel 12 – science bio/geo<br />

biology and detailed understanding of bacteria. ‘Aspects of Gram-positive<br />

bacteria are in focus also in several research groups at <strong>the</strong> Technical and<br />

Medical Faculties at <strong>Lund</strong> <strong>University</strong>’. From <strong>the</strong> information provided by<br />

<strong>the</strong> department information on Microbiology is ra<strong>the</strong>r poor. Microbiology<br />

of COB does not seem to be involved in special multi- and interdisciplinary<br />

activities of Genomic Ecology. This part of <strong>the</strong> department is<br />

also not described as a particularly strong and successful research area.<br />

Some good publications were found on <strong>the</strong> web and on-site discussions<br />

resulted in our overall assessment as very good.<br />

In general, for an outside reviewer <strong>the</strong> diversity of COB is difficult to justify<br />

from a functional point of view as <strong>the</strong>re exist collaborations across departmental<br />

borders (CAMVIS, experimental evolution, genomic ecology/<br />

evolution) and much less within <strong>the</strong> department itself. As far as research<br />

is concerned <strong>the</strong> department could easily split or merge according to <strong>the</strong><br />

future research areas pointed out by <strong>the</strong> department. Teaching should<br />

be organised across departmental borders, and should not be taken as an<br />

excuse for maintaining “old” structures which may not work. In particular,<br />

some subjects, for example genetics, can be found in various departments<br />

without clear collaborative connections. Potential for more collaboration<br />

certainly exists between COB and Ecology. Having all <strong>the</strong>se groups centred<br />

in one location (“Biology Center”) would help immensely. However,<br />

at <strong>the</strong> level above <strong>the</strong> Department, <strong>the</strong>re is an expressed wish to merge <strong>the</strong><br />

Department of Ecology with Cell and Organism Biology. For two reasons,<br />

we caution against a precipitate merger without <strong>the</strong> full agreement of both<br />

Departments. First, <strong>the</strong> Departments <strong>the</strong>mselves are still struggling to deal<br />

with <strong>the</strong> consequences of previous mergers. Second, across <strong>the</strong> world <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is a trend for Biology Departments to divide into Cell and Molecular on<br />

<strong>the</strong> one hand and Whole Organism on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. Despite its name, Cell<br />

and Organism is essentially Cell and Molecular while Animal Ecology has<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential to be rebranded Whole Organism.<br />

1.3 Research infrastructure<br />

According to <strong>the</strong>ir own assessment <strong>the</strong> research infrastructure of <strong>the</strong><br />

department is very good to good, and this seems to apply for all <strong>the</strong> different<br />

groups including those working in molecular biology, for example<br />

(microscopes, equipment for growth of microbial cells, equipment for<br />

cell disintegration, fractionation and component purification, large-scale<br />

production of recombinant proteins). The potent <strong>Lund</strong> Vision Group<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!