03.11.2014 Views

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Panel 16 – systems science<br />

PANEL 16 – SYSTEMS SCIENCE<br />

CONTENTs<br />

1. Foreword....................................................................................................452<br />

2. Remarks regarding <strong>the</strong> material that was given to us...................................452<br />

3. Overall assessment of Panel 16...................................................................453<br />

4. Gender & Equal Opportunities issues..........................................................455<br />

5. Department of Electrical and Information Technology................................ 456<br />

6. Department of Computer Science.............................................................. 465<br />

7. Department of Automatic Control...............................................................471<br />

1. Foreword<br />

The structure of <strong>the</strong> report was discussed and we came up with <strong>the</strong> following<br />

adjustments with regard to <strong>the</strong> proposed generic format. One of<br />

<strong>the</strong> main issues was that of <strong>the</strong> best grain for consideration: department<br />

or group? We have decided differently for <strong>the</strong> different departments.<br />

2. Remarks regarding<br />

<strong>the</strong> material that was given to us<br />

This material consisted of <strong>the</strong> Report for each panel. This report contained<br />

text answering questions such as: achievements, SWOTs, future<br />

plans, plus links to selected papers and o<strong>the</strong>r web site material. This<br />

report had more or less adequate length, as we think. We have, however,<br />

struggled finding <strong>the</strong> following information that we needed:<br />

• Up to date publication lists<br />

• Faculty for each group or each department; who did what for each<br />

item in <strong>the</strong> report; sometimes it was hard to correlate <strong>the</strong> publication<br />

lists that we had with <strong>the</strong> groups as <strong>the</strong>y showed up in <strong>the</strong> report;<br />

without names attached to <strong>the</strong> groups (or topics) our life was difficult.<br />

Of course we’d have been much helped in having a bibliometric study.<br />

We know how to trust and distrust it but it prevents us from expressing<br />

totally wrong statements. Also, having productivity ratios (per individuum)<br />

would have been useful.<br />

452

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!