ReseaRch Quality assuRance foR the futuRe a ... - Lund University

Panel 14 – chemistry
2.4.7 Biopolymers:
No real vision given, just a general statement;
2.5 SWOT analysis
S: Front line and impressive research on the borders of biology, with
strong emphasis of the physical and theoretical properties of the
systems studied.
W: Lack of focusing in future planning, absence of making of molecules
and material science as a core element in their strategy.
O: Use the age structure to start a well designed tenure track system
combined with a procative post-doctoral program trying to attract
excellent scientist from abroad for a limited stay (not tenure track).
T: Financial structure. Aging of staff. Low number of Ph.d. students.
Lack of innovation in several programs proposed, the feeling of we are
excellent hence continuing will keep us excellent. Too high number
of staff in certain areas which were successful in the past leaving little
room for new areas
2.6 Recommendations
1. A major initiative is required to improve and attract undergraduate
students from the high schools. The Chairman will be prepared to
amplify the various proven options available.
2. Commitment from the faculty and institutions to young scientists
embarking on the scientific careers, including:
a) A clear career path.
b) Mentorship programme
c) Substantial start-up funding
3. Serious considerations to change the name of the department to
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology.
4. Greater emphasis be given to making new molecules and materials.
5. Re-examination of methods used to recruit new members of staff.
6. Clear instructions from the Faculty concerning procedural and
strategic matters for the staff to implement.
400