13.01.2015 Views

health and safety plan solid waste management unit assessment

health and safety plan solid waste management unit assessment

health and safety plan solid waste management unit assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FUEL OILS 66-17<br />

h<strong>and</strong>ling operations may experience direct dermal contact if protective<br />

gloves <strong>and</strong> clothing are not worn. They may also receive small<br />

inhalation exposures from the more volatile components.<br />

66.3 HUMAN HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS<br />

66.3.1 Animal Studies<br />

66.3.1.1 Carcinogenicity<br />

Generally, number 1 <strong>and</strong> number 2 fuel oils are not carcinogenic<br />

even though they contain aromatic hydrocarbons (2219). In contrast,<br />

industrial fuels such as number 6 oil are residual oils which often<br />

contain highly condensed aromatic products from severe cracking<br />

processes. They may be carcinogenic to animals if they contain PAH<br />

components which boil above 37O'C (2219).<br />

Certain currently available fuel oils may be carcinogenic because<br />

they are derived from the blending of fractions boiling below 37O'C<br />

with those boiling at higher temperatures. Some of these high-boiling<br />

fuels which are derived from catalytic cracking processes may contain<br />

carcinogens (2219).<br />

Studies have demonstrated a direct relationship between tumor<br />

potency <strong>and</strong> the concentration of high-boiling fractions which are added<br />

to form blends. It was determined that when not more than 10 volume %<br />

of 7OO'F+ catalytic gas oil or clarified oil is present, the tumor<br />

potency values of the blends are less than 20.<strong>and</strong> therefore have<br />

borderline significance. The tumor potency value is a representation<br />

of the tumor formation rate in response to application to mouse skin.<br />

For a value of 20, 500 days would be required for a 50% tumor response<br />

(1818) (see Table 66-4). Examination of boiling ranges of blended<br />

petroleum products may not provide an accurate <strong>assessment</strong> of their<br />

carcinogenic potential. In the opinion of Bingham a &. (2219), these<br />

materials are probably carcinogenic <strong>and</strong> their potency may be<br />

underestimated or overestimated if the diluent contains cocarcinogens<br />

or inhibitors.<br />

Frazier <strong>and</strong> Mahlum (1819) tested the initiation activity of a fuel<br />

oil blend (FOB) which contained part of a heavy molecular weight<br />

distillate boiling at 288-454'C <strong>and</strong> 2.9 parts of a distillate boiling<br />

between 176 <strong>and</strong> 288'C. The FOB (25 mg) was applied to the clipped<br />

backs of CD-1 mice in a 50 PL volume. Two weeks after initiation, the<br />

animals received doses of 5 rg phorbol myristate acetate in 50 PL'<br />

acetone twice weekly for 24 weeks. Negative controls were treated with<br />

acetone. Positive controls were initiated with 50 pg benzo[a]pyrene<br />

(BAP) or dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA). The FOB showed significant<br />

initiating activity. Approximately 60 tumors were seen after -170<br />

days. Greater than 200 tumors were observed in the BAP positive<br />

controls. Hydrotreated FOB was also tested in the same manner.<br />

Hydrotreatment has been suggested as a possible method for reducing<br />

biological activity of coal-derived materials. In this group about 17%<br />

6,'87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!