03.05.2015 Views

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION.<br />

hvii.<br />

James <strong>ca</strong>me to Dundee, <strong>Wedderburn</strong> was amon.cr those who rode out to meet <strong>in</strong>trod.<br />

him and drank at <strong>the</strong> Cross to his success, collected <strong>the</strong> excise<br />

ttJefsT'" °^ ^''* behalf, and a few days later accepted James' appo<strong>in</strong>tment<br />

<strong>of</strong> him as governor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>ca</strong>stle <strong>of</strong> Broiighty at tlie mouth <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Tay. On <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jacobite arms, <strong>the</strong> town council <strong>of</strong> Dundee<br />

were fearful <strong>of</strong> overlook<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir clerk. They appo<strong>in</strong>ted a<br />

committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>quiry and <strong>the</strong>n consulted <strong>the</strong> Lord Justice Clerk, who decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

to advise <strong>the</strong>m. Ultimately <strong>the</strong>v suggested that it was <strong>in</strong>convenient that <strong>the</strong><br />

same person should be, what <strong>Wedderburn</strong> was, both clerk <strong>of</strong> Dundee and<br />

sheriff clerk <strong>of</strong> Forfar, and on this ground, and also be<strong>ca</strong>use he liad decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

to appear before <strong>the</strong>m when summoned, deposed him from <strong>the</strong><br />

"^'^'^ "^ '^^'^^^ '" October 1716. They seem, however, to ft:om'\h'e°cier°k*<br />

have<br />

ship oi Dundee, doubted whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y had acted legally, as some months later,<br />

9 April 1717, <strong>Wedderburn</strong> still decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to appear, tliey heard'<br />

<strong>the</strong> evidence all over aga<strong>in</strong>, and also got a decree that tlieir deposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> him was just and legal. Thus ended <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>Bcial connection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family<br />

with <strong>the</strong> burgh <strong>of</strong> Dundee. The ex-clerk, however, still reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong>'s<br />

and papers which were <strong>in</strong> his custody, and decl<strong>in</strong>ed to give <strong>the</strong>m up, and,<br />

although <strong>the</strong> town started a process and got a decreet for <strong>the</strong>ir delivery <strong>in</strong><br />

1718, it was not until 1742 that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n clerk was able to report that" he<br />

had now got from Blackness <strong>the</strong> haill papers that were <strong>in</strong> his hands belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong> town." ileanwhile <strong>Wedderburn</strong> still rema<strong>in</strong>ed both collector <strong>of</strong> excise<br />

and sheriff-clerk <strong>of</strong> Forfar. I do not know when he retired from <strong>the</strong> latter<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, but have no reference to him as hold<strong>in</strong>g it later than 1720, when he<br />

may have resigned it to his son, Robert, who sooner or later succeeded him <strong>in</strong><br />

it. I have already dealt with both his purchase <strong>of</strong> Blackness <strong>in</strong> 1718 and<br />

with his succession as fourth baronet <strong>in</strong> 172.3. Up to this time his affairs were<br />

evidently prosperous, but <strong>the</strong>y did not long rema<strong>in</strong> so. Possibly <strong>the</strong> price he<br />

had paid for Blackness was beyond its value; possibly <strong>the</strong> failuie <strong>of</strong> delitors<br />

<strong>of</strong> his own to meet <strong>the</strong>ir engagements was <strong>the</strong> <strong>ca</strong>use <strong>of</strong> his ditlicullie?. But<br />

whatever <strong>the</strong> <strong>ca</strong>use, it is clear that, from 1733 on, his affaiis and those <strong>of</strong><br />

his son John be<strong>ca</strong>me more and more <strong>in</strong>volved, and <strong>in</strong> 1741 <strong>the</strong> estate <strong>of</strong><br />

Blackness, which he had struggled to keep <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> family, iiad to be sold.<br />

This Hiu-st have been a severe blow to his pride, whe<strong>the</strong>r as tlie head <strong>of</strong> his<br />

house, or as a bus<strong>in</strong>ess man, who had always (as one <strong>of</strong> his grandsons writes)<br />

been "remarkably correct <strong>in</strong> all his actions and <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess." After <strong>the</strong><br />

sale <strong>of</strong> Blackness, he lived <strong>in</strong> Dundee, but did not survive for manv<br />

years. In September 1744 he had a touch <strong>of</strong> fever, and soon after died and<br />

was buried <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Howff. There are at Meredith portraits <strong>of</strong> him and his wife<br />

by Sir John de Med<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> which engrav<strong>in</strong>gs are given <strong>in</strong> this volume<br />

(pp. 256-57). He had married at Dundee <strong>in</strong> 1G97 Kathar<strong>in</strong>e Scott (daugliter<br />

<strong>of</strong> John Scott <strong>of</strong> Dundee), who is said to have brought him a "tocher <strong>of</strong><br />

'<br />

£10,000 sterl<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> those days a very considerable sum <strong>in</strong> Scotland. By her<br />

(who survived him and died 1701-02) he had a large family <strong>of</strong> fifteen children,<br />

<strong>of</strong> whom, however, four sons, James fborn 1093), John (1 7* 12),<br />

The children Alexander (1703), and Alexander (1709), and tour daughters,<br />

baroneT"'' Christian, Kathar<strong>in</strong>e (1711), Margaret, and Mary all died<br />

young at various dates before 1723. From <strong>the</strong> youngest <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g daughters, ano<strong>the</strong>r Kathar<strong>in</strong>e, who married David Scrymgeour ot<br />

Birkhill, descend <strong>the</strong> Scrymgeour-Weddeiburns <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, with whom I<br />

have already dealt, and from <strong>the</strong> three eldest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g tons.<br />

John, fifth baronet <strong>of</strong> Blackness, Eobert <strong>of</strong> Pearsie, and Thomas <strong>of</strong> Cantm.<br />

come <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g branches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Blackness family. One o<strong>the</strong>r son, Alexander,<br />

who died <strong>in</strong> 1790, never married, but is said to have had a romantic <strong>ca</strong>reer,<br />

and was for many years a well known figure <strong>in</strong> Dundee while <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two<br />

;<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r daughters one, Grisell, married James Graham <strong>of</strong> Meathie, co. Forlar.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!