Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
xlvL THE WEDDERBURN BOOK.<br />
Introd. <strong>the</strong> Dundee records, he no doubt died yonngf. The only rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g son<br />
Alexander, was edu<strong>ca</strong>ted at S. Andrew's, and admitted a<br />
burgess <strong>of</strong><br />
AilxlndV<br />
Dundee <strong>in</strong> 1600. He. like his fa<strong>the</strong>r, was an<br />
died i642-4a active merchant, and is named as own<strong>in</strong>g goods arriv<strong>in</strong>fT at<br />
<strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Dundee from Fh<strong>in</strong>ders, Bordeaux, and Stockholm.<br />
He died <strong>in</strong> 1642-43, hav<strong>in</strong>g had issue by his wife, Barbara Anch<strong>in</strong>lek,' four<br />
sons, Patrick, John, Andrew, and William, <strong>of</strong> whom <strong>the</strong> first two died<br />
unmarried or without issue before Nov. 1640, when tiieir bro<strong>the</strong>r Andrew<br />
was returned heir to <strong>the</strong>m. William, who was admitted burgess <strong>of</strong> Dundee <strong>in</strong><br />
1640, went to sea, and would seem to have left no descendants, as here aga<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>re is no reference to any such <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dundee records. Andrew <strong>Wedderburn</strong>,<br />
who was thus his fa<strong>the</strong>r's only surviv<strong>in</strong>g son, and was heir to<br />
^'^ ^'^'^ ^^'^^'^ bro<strong>the</strong>rs,<br />
Wedd^bum.<br />
was admitted a burgess <strong>of</strong> Dundee <strong>in</strong><br />
died 1683. 1634, and long traded <strong>the</strong>re as a merchant. He was alsi on<br />
several oc<strong>ca</strong>sions "stentar," or collector <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> duties, for <strong>the</strong><br />
burgh. Though twice married— (1) <strong>in</strong> 1643 to Eispet Fletcher, (2) <strong>in</strong>' 1604 to<br />
Christian Dun<strong>ca</strong>n—he had no children. His second wife died <strong>in</strong> 1677-78,<br />
8ome five years before her husband, whose death occurred <strong>in</strong> 1683-84.<br />
So far <strong>the</strong> branches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family with which I have dealt have been<br />
those, <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> which were ei<strong>the</strong>r occupied as merchants<br />
Ee<strong>ca</strong>pltuiation. or shipowners or concerned with religion. It was, no doubt, <strong>the</strong><br />
couvenience <strong>of</strong> Dundee as a trad<strong>in</strong>g port that took thi<strong>the</strong>r from<br />
Berwickshire <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al settler <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> name, and thus <strong>the</strong> earliest members<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family connected with tlie burgh are all merchants.- In one branch<br />
<strong>the</strong> two sons <strong>of</strong> John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Margaret L<strong>in</strong>dsay, be<strong>ca</strong>me respectively<br />
a dist<strong>in</strong>guished doctor and a piom<strong>in</strong>ent bishop, wliile <strong>in</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r, that <strong>of</strong><br />
Pittormie, we f<strong>in</strong>d William W^edderburn <strong>of</strong> Pittenweem and Dundee, James <strong>of</strong><br />
Moonzie and his three sons, all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m m<strong>in</strong>isters opposed to episcopacy.<br />
But <strong>of</strong> all those mentioned up till now only one, John <strong>of</strong> Craigie, was bred<br />
to what may be described as for long tiie hereditary pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family,<br />
* When tlie Wedilerbuni raouutnents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Howff <strong>of</strong> Dundee were be<strong>in</strong>g put <strong>in</strong> orJer <strong>in</strong> 1892, <strong>the</strong><br />
workmen <strong>ca</strong>me across a fragment <strong>of</strong> an old tombstone, <strong>the</strong> sculpture <strong>of</strong> which showed it to<br />
belong to <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seventeenth century. It consists <strong>of</strong> a framework enclos<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
passage from <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Job (x., 25-i!7) with <strong>the</strong> Aucl'.iiilck arms on <strong>the</strong> right-hand side. The<br />
left-hand end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stone is broken <strong>of</strong>f, but if. as is p(w.sible, it bore <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wedderburn</strong> arms, <strong>the</strong><br />
stone was without doubt that <strong>of</strong> Aiesauder <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and CarKara Auch<strong>in</strong>lck. The peculiar<br />
word<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passage quoted follows <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bishop's I'.ible <strong>of</strong> l.')72, except that <strong>the</strong><br />
Scottisii " thocht " is used for though. The exact condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fragment may be seen from<br />
<strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g repr<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passage, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> words, etc., broken away are given <strong>in</strong> italics.<br />
For T am sure that my redeemer liveth and<br />
He sal rayse up at <strong>the</strong> leter day tliame that ly <strong>in</strong><br />
The tlie dust and thocht efter my sk<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vmmea Thb<br />
Wkdoerburn dtstrny this iody yet sal 1 sie God <strong>in</strong> my Acch<strong>in</strong>xek<br />
Abms ?<br />
and my eiea Arms.<br />
Jiesche vhum 1 myself sal sie<br />
sul beholde and none o<strong>the</strong>r for me thucbt my<br />
rei/nes are coosumed vthiu me. Job 10 chapter<br />
S5, 26, and 27.<br />
The stone is now <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dundee Museum, to which it was presented by Mr. Scrymgeour-<br />
Wedderbnrn <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wedderburn</strong>.<br />
occupation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> younger • The sons <strong>of</strong> good families <strong>in</strong> tra/le. and even as small shopkeepers, was<br />
always exceetUngly common <strong>in</strong> Scotland until late iuU) <strong>the</strong> cigliteentb century, especially <strong>in</strong><br />
times <strong>of</strong> peace. "Sir Walter Scott puts <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g James himself a very graphic<br />
account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process by which <strong>the</strong> young .Scot j.ut hia pedigree and his blazon <strong>in</strong> his pocket<br />
and set up hia U>otli ancl s.'ld liis ftutfi until <strong>the</strong> lucky day wheu he could cock hia beaver<br />
once more with <strong>the</strong> Inj.it, and ftj-»ert <strong>the</strong> old prtten.«ion8 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stock" (Wdlium /l/ackicood and<br />
ki4 ioM». by .Mrs. Oliphaiil, lllackwoo.1. 1S97). The bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lords L<strong>in</strong>dsay <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
sixtreiilb century wiia a " wntrlit " <strong>in</strong> Cup.ir, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth <strong>the</strong> heir <strong>of</strong> Dundaa <strong>of</strong><br />
Kiiiga-k kept a »li.'p <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> I-iwn Market <strong>of</strong> Kd<strong>in</strong>burgh, while many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lairds <strong>of</strong> Banff ami<br />
AU-rdr