03.05.2015 Views

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 THE WEDDERBURN BOOK.<br />

Part II.<br />

Chap. V,<br />

8 Feb. 1821)1; but at length, 2 July 1821, <strong>the</strong> Privy Council, while <strong>the</strong>y postponed<br />

without decision his right to appear at <strong>the</strong> coronation, approved his hereditary title to <strong>the</strong><br />

Office he claimed and he w;xs presented a.s royal standard bearer at <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g's levee at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g year. The <strong>of</strong>fice is now held bv his grandson and successor, whose<br />

attendance as Hereditary Royal Standard Bearer <strong>of</strong> Scotland, toge<strong>the</strong>r with that <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r great Scottish <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> state, was commanded by <strong>the</strong> (jueen when Her<br />

Majesty unveiled <strong>the</strong> statue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Consort iu Charlotte Square. Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh,<br />

17 Aug. 18/ C- '<br />

^ '<br />

Like his bro<strong>the</strong>r Alexander, he at one time contemplated establish<strong>in</strong>g his ri'dit to <strong>the</strong><br />

Earldom <strong>of</strong> Dundee and Viscountcy <strong>of</strong> Dudhopo before <strong>the</strong> Houvc <strong>of</strong> Lords, and "cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

to some extent <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation begun by his bro<strong>the</strong>r, with <strong>the</strong> assist^uice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> em<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

bcotch peerage lawyer, Mr. J. Riddell, but beyond this took no active ste[)s.^<br />

He took much <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> ihe preparation by J.W. <strong>of</strong> his pr<strong>in</strong>ted memoir <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wedderbums<br />

and gave him every opportunity and <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> his power, but <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> documents<br />

<strong>in</strong> his possession relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ^Vedderburns seems to have rema<strong>in</strong>ed practi<strong>ca</strong>lly<br />

unexam<strong>in</strong>ed.* Several letters passed between <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> subject (S.W. 70.5. TOG ; J.W.<br />

12, 13), and <strong>the</strong>re are also some letters to Henry Scryni-eour-Weddc'rburn' from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family, <strong>in</strong>cidentally conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g notes <strong>of</strong> family matters,* which I<br />

have made use <strong>of</strong> iu <strong>the</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> those to whom <strong>the</strong>y refer. At one time, 17 Feb. 1835<br />

(S.W. 721), <strong>the</strong>re was talk between him and my grandfa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>n at Auchterhouse, near<br />

Dundee, <strong>of</strong> his restor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Weddcrburn monuments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Howff', but noth<strong>in</strong>g was done,<br />

and we <strong>ca</strong>n only regret that this work was left untouched till nearly sixty "v<strong>ca</strong>rs later<br />

(1892-93), when <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> so long neglected stones had become hopelessly bad<br />

(see post, s. <strong>the</strong> Chapter on <strong>the</strong> Howll).<br />

Mr. Scryrageour-<strong>Wedderburn</strong> died at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh 20 Eec. 1841 (Gent. Mar/, vol. xvii.,<br />

p. 228). There is a f<strong>in</strong>e portrait <strong>of</strong> him at Birkhill, pa<strong>in</strong>ted by Raeburu <strong>in</strong> ]S22,« as well<br />

as one <strong>of</strong> his wife by George Watson, and a group by <strong>the</strong> latter artist <strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong> liis'childreii<br />

(Frederick, JIatilda, and Euphemia) when young. There are also m<strong>in</strong>iatures <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong><br />

his daughters at Birkhill. A facsimile <strong>of</strong> his signature is given opposite p. 72 <strong>of</strong> vol. ii.<br />

He had married at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, 5 April 1793,' Mary Turner Maitland,* eldest<br />

daughter to Capta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hou. Frederick Lewis Maitlaud, R.N., sixth son <strong>of</strong> Charles, sistli<br />

' This and o<strong>the</strong>r letters on <strong>the</strong> subject are iu <strong>the</strong> Scrymgeoiir-WedJerburn Charter Chest, vi., xii., 128-38,<br />

anil see J.W. 15.<br />

= See letters to him frona <strong>the</strong> Secretary <strong>of</strong> .St.^te, 23 July, 1, 2 Aug. 1876, now at Birkhill. Among <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong>iBcera <strong>of</strong> state who attended with him were <strong>the</strong> Lord Keeper <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal (Marquis ut Lothian),<br />

<strong>the</strong> Keeper <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Seal (E«rl <strong>of</strong> Selkirk), <strong>the</strong> I,. .rd Justice Clerk. Lord Clerk Register, Lord<br />

Justice General, and Lord Advo<strong>ca</strong>te ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> hereditary Standard Bearer (Earl <strong>of</strong> Lauderdale) and <strong>the</strong><br />

hereditary Armour Bearer (Sir H. J. Setou-Stewart, Bart.).<br />

* When I <strong>ca</strong>me to exaniiue <strong>the</strong> Charter Chest and collect toge<strong>the</strong>r all <strong>the</strong> material Scrymgeour and W'edderburn<br />

documents, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> it or at Birkhill, I found that Mr. Kiddell had <strong>in</strong>ventoried barely one<br />

sixth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documents cow <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> chest. See vol. ii., pp. 3 and 84-83, where it appears that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are now some 2 500 jiapers, out <strong>of</strong> which Mr. Riddell <strong>in</strong>ventoried 371.<br />

* Alexander Scrymgeour- Wedderburu had made a cursory exam<strong>in</strong>ation for Lord Loughborough <strong>in</strong> 1782,<br />

and had <strong>the</strong>n drawn up a list <strong>of</strong> some twenty-five VVedderburu documeuts (S.W. 669), which J. W.<br />

seems also to have exam<strong>in</strong>ed ; but <strong>the</strong> greater mass, if looked at. were nut dealt with.<br />

5 See S.W. 702, 703, 707-9, 711, 714, 7!5, 716, 718, 721 ; and J.W. 11-20 ; for letters to him from J.W.<br />

and Charles <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pearsie. There are also some lettei-s from Sir James Webster-<br />

Wedderburu, viz., 6 March 1824, ask<strong>in</strong>g him to be a trustee <strong>of</strong> his marriage settlement which H.S.W.<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed (S.W. 712-13) : 16 Dec. 1S29, to give evidence as to Sir James' (supposed) claim to <strong>the</strong><br />

Blackness baronetcy (post, Part III , chap, ix.) and also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'Wedderbura suit (see post, ibid.),<br />

but H.S.W. does not seem to have encouraged <strong>the</strong> correspondence.<br />

* The receipt for this picture is at Birkhill. It is dated 24 April 1822, and <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> picture was<br />

eighty gu<strong>in</strong>eas.<br />

^ There is a family register <strong>in</strong> his hand <strong>in</strong> an old ('1762) Bible at Birkhill. beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g " Henry Scrymgeour and<br />

Mary Turner .Maitland were married at Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh on <strong>the</strong> fifth day <strong>of</strong> .\pril 1793," after which <strong>the</strong>re<br />

follows a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir children iu <strong>the</strong> above account <strong>of</strong> whom <strong>the</strong> entries reUt<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>m are quoted.<br />

The numbers after each name give <strong>the</strong> priority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children irrespective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sex. The<br />

iLd<strong>in</strong>burjh Faritik Rcjixtcr not ha\<strong>in</strong>g beeu searched for <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Scrymgeour, <strong>the</strong> entries <strong>of</strong><br />

H.S.W.'s marriage and his children's births, are not given <strong>in</strong> vol- ii., pp. 499 set/.<br />

' Her fa<strong>the</strong>r died 16 Dec. 1786 (S.W. 698), Iiav<strong>in</strong>g married 2S Aug. 1767. Her mo<strong>the</strong>r was Margaret Dick<br />

MakgiU, heiress <strong>of</strong> Raukeillour and Liudores. co. Fife, a descendant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same family as Jean<br />

McGill, who married John Scrymgeour <strong>of</strong> Kirktoun <strong>in</strong> 1624 (ante, p. 170). It appears that James<br />

McGill <strong>of</strong> Rankeillour who had made a settlement <strong>of</strong> his property <strong>in</strong> 1738, d.s.p,, and was<br />

fiucceeded by his sister Isobel McGill wlio m. <strong>the</strong> Rev. William Dick <strong>of</strong> Cupar and d. 13 Jan. 1787<br />

(S.W. 69S), and w.is succeeded by her grand-daughter Margaret 3Iaitland-Makgill, wlio d. 17 March<br />

1825 [ilaUland- .Mahjill Papers, S.W., yii., ii., B. 1-5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!