Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
•xL THE WEDDERBURN BOOK.<br />
Introd William Hamilton's, hir bro<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>in</strong>-law's, house." I have not ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong><br />
date <strong>of</strong> her death, but she survived her husband and was liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1G91.<br />
T)ie issue ot" <strong>the</strong> marriage was three sons and live daughters, <strong>in</strong> regard to<br />
none <strong>of</strong> whom have I got much <strong>in</strong>formation. The daughters were all<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g and unmarried <strong>in</strong> 1G90. The sons were, Robert, who was served heir<br />
to his fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> 1670 and was liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1G82, when he is <strong>ca</strong>lled " Mr.<br />
Kobert," a prefi.x: usually imply<strong>in</strong>g some degree or learned qualifi<strong>ca</strong>tion;<br />
William, who see<strong>in</strong>s to have piedeceased his fa<strong>the</strong>r ; and John, who was<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1691. I have no record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent <strong>ca</strong>reer <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r Robert<br />
or John, both <strong>of</strong> whom may, <strong>of</strong> course, have married and left descendants.<br />
III. The third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four contemporary members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family whom<br />
we f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> Dundee <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifteenth century was David Wed-<br />
David<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> derburn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Murraygait, who is frequently named <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
died 1495-97! records between 1464 and 1497. He is oc<strong>ca</strong>sionally designed<br />
"scutifer," and was at one time on <strong>the</strong> Dundee Council.<br />
He married Christian Anderson (who is named as his widow <strong>in</strong> 1497), and<br />
left issue two sons, David and James, and perhaps some daughters. The<br />
priority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons is not known, but it is immaterial, as it is clear that<br />
James, although it is possible that he married, died s.p., before Oct. 1524,<br />
when his bro<strong>the</strong>r is spoken <strong>of</strong> as his heir. This bro<strong>the</strong>r was David <strong>Wedderburn</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Craigie and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Murraygait, who married Helen Lawson,<br />
and whom Douglas <strong>in</strong> his Baronage <strong>of</strong> Scotland, followed by J.W. <strong>in</strong> his<br />
pr<strong>in</strong>ted memoir and by several o<strong>the</strong>rs, makes <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Alexander<br />
<strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gennie. He was noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d, and his <strong>ca</strong>reer is<br />
now clearly ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed. He was horn ai)0ut 14vS5 and died <strong>in</strong> 1559-60,<br />
some two years before K<strong>in</strong>gennie's birth. Dur<strong>in</strong>g his long life he was an<br />
active member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community <strong>in</strong> Dundee, to <strong>the</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> which he<br />
was admitted before 1514, so that his admission is not entered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Loclcit Builc, <strong>in</strong> which he is, however, named as "dean <strong>of</strong> gild" <strong>in</strong> 1524.<br />
There is a very curious entry <strong>in</strong> one <strong>of</strong> tlie Dundee Protocol Books which<br />
probably refers to him. It is dated 15 July l.o27, and is <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
sale to David Wedilerburn by Alexander Dlak for £20 <strong>of</strong> Blak's " maritagium<br />
" or right to marry, and <strong>of</strong> an agreement by Blak to accept <strong>in</strong><br />
marriage any wife however jila<strong>in</strong>, maimed (" lus<strong>ca</strong> aut claudieata "),<br />
David or ail<strong>in</strong>g, short <strong>of</strong> two diseases " le bock et cragyngour." The<br />
dledTsia' nature "<strong>of</strong> this transaction is not clear to me, and I do not<br />
know if it has any parallel <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r old records. It seems<br />
as if Blak was resign<strong>in</strong>g his right to marry some particular person, and<br />
certa<strong>in</strong> it is that soon after we f<strong>in</strong>d David married to Crist<strong>in</strong>a Jameson,<br />
his first wife. His position among his fellow-citizens is <strong>in</strong>di<strong>ca</strong>ted by his lie<strong>in</strong>g<br />
made trustee for <strong>the</strong> lepers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burgh <strong>in</strong> 1534, and hy <strong>the</strong> fact that many<br />
years later it was <strong>in</strong> his house that <strong>the</strong> council deposited <strong>the</strong> Church plate ui<br />
<strong>the</strong> burgh <strong>in</strong> time <strong>of</strong> war. Thus, 12 Aug. 1557, <strong>the</strong> burgh records tell us<br />
that "<strong>the</strong> council and communitie hes receivit from <strong>the</strong> liauds <strong>of</strong> pa\ i,l<br />
David had <strong>in</strong> keiimig. _I[o<br />
'<br />
<strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Craigie <strong>the</strong>ir jewels . . . which<br />
was also at one time "clerk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cocket" and "searcher <strong>of</strong> all gouds'^ m<br />
Dundee, be<strong>in</strong>g so appo<strong>in</strong>ted by a letter under <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal, dated 11 I-eli.<br />
1550, and <strong>in</strong> this <strong>of</strong>iice he was succeeded bv his son James. In contract with<br />
this respectability, we f<strong>in</strong>d both him and his sons <strong>in</strong> oc<strong>ca</strong>sional .li<strong>in</strong>enltics.<br />
He took part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> family feud between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wedderburn</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> Kole.ts,<br />
to which I have already referred, and was "fugitive from law aii.l at ti.e<br />
horn" for <strong>the</strong> slaughter <strong>of</strong> David Rollok <strong>in</strong> 154:}. Ten years later .-tl! l.o<br />
and his sons are charged with hav<strong>in</strong>g "troubled Robert MersclM-ll. ..;U-r oi<br />
<strong>the</strong> burgh, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> his dutv," and, although he, alter reU-rru.g