03.05.2015 Views

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

•xL THE WEDDERBURN BOOK.<br />

Introd William Hamilton's, hir bro<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>in</strong>-law's, house." I have not ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong><br />

date <strong>of</strong> her death, but she survived her husband and was liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1G91.<br />

T)ie issue ot" <strong>the</strong> marriage was three sons and live daughters, <strong>in</strong> regard to<br />

none <strong>of</strong> whom have I got much <strong>in</strong>formation. The daughters were all<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g and unmarried <strong>in</strong> 1G90. The sons were, Robert, who was served heir<br />

to his fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> 1670 and was liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1G82, when he is <strong>ca</strong>lled " Mr.<br />

Kobert," a prefi.x: usually imply<strong>in</strong>g some degree or learned qualifi<strong>ca</strong>tion;<br />

William, who see<strong>in</strong>s to have piedeceased his fa<strong>the</strong>r ; and John, who was<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1691. I have no record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent <strong>ca</strong>reer <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r Robert<br />

or John, both <strong>of</strong> whom may, <strong>of</strong> course, have married and left descendants.<br />

III. The third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four contemporary members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family whom<br />

we f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> Dundee <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifteenth century was David Wed-<br />

David<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> derburn <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Murraygait, who is frequently named <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

died 1495-97! records between 1464 and 1497. He is oc<strong>ca</strong>sionally designed<br />

"scutifer," and was at one time on <strong>the</strong> Dundee Council.<br />

He married Christian Anderson (who is named as his widow <strong>in</strong> 1497), and<br />

left issue two sons, David and James, and perhaps some daughters. The<br />

priority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons is not known, but it is immaterial, as it is clear that<br />

James, although it is possible that he married, died s.p., before Oct. 1524,<br />

when his bro<strong>the</strong>r is spoken <strong>of</strong> as his heir. This bro<strong>the</strong>r was David <strong>Wedderburn</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Craigie and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Murraygait, who married Helen Lawson,<br />

and whom Douglas <strong>in</strong> his Baronage <strong>of</strong> Scotland, followed by J.W. <strong>in</strong> his<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ted memoir and by several o<strong>the</strong>rs, makes <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Alexander<br />

<strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gennie. He was noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d, and his <strong>ca</strong>reer is<br />

now clearly ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed. He was horn ai)0ut 14vS5 and died <strong>in</strong> 1559-60,<br />

some two years before K<strong>in</strong>gennie's birth. Dur<strong>in</strong>g his long life he was an<br />

active member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community <strong>in</strong> Dundee, to <strong>the</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> which he<br />

was admitted before 1514, so that his admission is not entered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Loclcit Builc, <strong>in</strong> which he is, however, named as "dean <strong>of</strong> gild" <strong>in</strong> 1524.<br />

There is a very curious entry <strong>in</strong> one <strong>of</strong> tlie Dundee Protocol Books which<br />

probably refers to him. It is dated 15 July l.o27, and is <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sale to David Wedilerburn by Alexander Dlak for £20 <strong>of</strong> Blak's " maritagium<br />

" or right to marry, and <strong>of</strong> an agreement by Blak to accept <strong>in</strong><br />

marriage any wife however jila<strong>in</strong>, maimed (" lus<strong>ca</strong> aut claudieata "),<br />

David or ail<strong>in</strong>g, short <strong>of</strong> two diseases " le bock et cragyngour." The<br />

dledTsia' nature "<strong>of</strong> this transaction is not clear to me, and I do not<br />

know if it has any parallel <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r old records. It seems<br />

as if Blak was resign<strong>in</strong>g his right to marry some particular person, and<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> it is that soon after we f<strong>in</strong>d David married to Crist<strong>in</strong>a Jameson,<br />

his first wife. His position among his fellow-citizens is <strong>in</strong>di<strong>ca</strong>ted by his lie<strong>in</strong>g<br />

made trustee for <strong>the</strong> lepers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burgh <strong>in</strong> 1534, and hy <strong>the</strong> fact that many<br />

years later it was <strong>in</strong> his house that <strong>the</strong> council deposited <strong>the</strong> Church plate ui<br />

<strong>the</strong> burgh <strong>in</strong> time <strong>of</strong> war. Thus, 12 Aug. 1557, <strong>the</strong> burgh records tell us<br />

that "<strong>the</strong> council and communitie hes receivit from <strong>the</strong> liauds <strong>of</strong> pa\ i,l<br />

David had <strong>in</strong> keiimig. _I[o<br />

'<br />

<strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Craigie <strong>the</strong>ir jewels . . . which<br />

was also at one time "clerk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cocket" and "searcher <strong>of</strong> all gouds'^ m<br />

Dundee, be<strong>in</strong>g so appo<strong>in</strong>ted by a letter under <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal, dated 11 I-eli.<br />

1550, and <strong>in</strong> this <strong>of</strong>iice he was succeeded bv his son James. In contract with<br />

this respectability, we f<strong>in</strong>d both him and his sons <strong>in</strong> oc<strong>ca</strong>sional .li<strong>in</strong>enltics.<br />

He took part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> family feud between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wedderburn</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> Kole.ts,<br />

to which I have already referred, and was "fugitive from law aii.l at ti.e<br />

horn" for <strong>the</strong> slaughter <strong>of</strong> David Rollok <strong>in</strong> 154:}. Ten years later .-tl! l.o<br />

and his sons are charged with hav<strong>in</strong>g "troubled Robert MersclM-ll. ..;U-r oi<br />

<strong>the</strong> burgh, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> his dutv," and, although he, alter reU-rru.g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!