03.05.2015 Views

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

;<br />

114 THE WEDDEUBURX BOOK.<br />

Part 11.<br />

Chap. II.<br />

cous<strong>in</strong>, Peter Weddcrhuni (Br.T. 8); was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> next <strong>of</strong> k<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong><br />

children <strong>of</strong> Robert ^[^lr^ly (unto, p 20) 10 Doc. IG'iG (D.B.R. 438); and<br />

to James, son <strong>of</strong> tiio lute William ThoniKoii "J Feb. 1G42 (D.B.R. 444).<br />

He was heir and executor to <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> his uncle James, <strong>the</strong> merchant,<br />

who died <strong>in</strong> 16 U (lii-.T. 1.3), and is <strong>of</strong>ten referred to <strong>in</strong> connection with<br />

his heirship.i Tims, 10 Aup;. JGJC, he. "elder, merchant, burgess,"<br />

delivers to <strong>the</strong> kirk session <strong>the</strong> silver b.is<strong>in</strong> left <strong>the</strong>m by James (S.W. 293)<br />

27 Nov. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same year he was rotoiired heir to him {S.W. 29.5 ; R.H. 22) •<br />

27 Jan. 1649, " elder, sliip<strong>in</strong>aster," was entered as his heir <strong>in</strong> an annual rent<br />

( D.P.B. iijj)) ;<br />

and 3 .May i 6.5<br />

1<br />

"<br />

, elder, skipper." gets a decree as his e.xecntor<br />

(D^B.R. 4.53). 'I'ho last references to him as liv<strong>in</strong>g are dated 4 J<strong>in</strong>ie, 16 July<br />

1652, when he, "siiipmaster, burgess," got sas<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> an annual rent, and aga<strong>in</strong>,<br />

"skipper." was procurator for his cous<strong>in</strong>. Sir Alexander <strong>of</strong> Blackness, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

resignation <strong>of</strong> an East Welgait laud (D.P.B. 460. 476). He died before<br />

4 Oct. 16-52, when his two daughters were served heirs portioners to him<br />

(D.B.R. 456) and he is <strong>the</strong>n only named <strong>in</strong> connection with <strong>the</strong>m (see below)<br />

or with property once his, which, as I have said, ultimately passed to<br />

Alexander <strong>of</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gcnnie.'<br />

He had married, Oct.-Dec. 1617, Janet Newton, daughter and heir <strong>of</strong><br />

William Newton. She is fii-st named <strong>in</strong> an entry, dated 31 Oct. 1617, when<br />

he, as heir to his fa<strong>the</strong>r, gets sas<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a North Argylegait land, which he<br />

settles on her as his futtn-e wife, and which refers to "<strong>the</strong>ir marriage contract<br />

<strong>of</strong> 9 May last (D.P.B. 3D')). A settlement by her on her husband and herself<br />

is registered 13 Dec. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same vear (i/>. 410'i, while a bond <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

favour, 16 May 1619, is al.'fo recorded (K.l). 71). By her, <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> whose<br />

death is not ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed, Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> had issue two dann-hters,<br />

1. Helen <strong>Wedderburn</strong>,- who with her sister Elizabeth was entered an<br />

heir porti'oner <strong>of</strong> her fa<strong>the</strong>r 4 Oct. 16-52 (H.R.R. 456). She married<br />

twice, (i.), before 14 Feb. 1653, ]VUliam Gaacoyne or Gosk<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

Englishman, with whom she is first named at that date when she<br />

and her sister and her husband get a decree for <strong>the</strong> rent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

North Argylegait house (l>.B.R. 460). They are all named aga<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> decrees w. <strong>the</strong> executors <strong>of</strong> Alexander. 29"Oct. 16.'i3 and 21 Jan-<br />

16'4 (D.B.R. 462), as well as <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r decrees. 7 Jan., 1 March 1154<br />

[ib. i(jiah). She and her sister are entered <strong>in</strong> lands <strong>in</strong> Dundee,<br />

3 Dec 1653, as heirs portiouers both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fa<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong>ir o-reat<br />

uncle, James '<strong>Wedderburn</strong>, to whom, as we have seen, <strong>the</strong>ir fa<strong>the</strong>r<br />

was heir (D.P.B. 477). On 25 April 16-55 <strong>the</strong>y and <strong>the</strong>ir spouses<br />

imite <strong>in</strong> resign<strong>in</strong>g a South Seagait land to Alexander Bower (D.P.B.<br />

481), soon after when William Gascoyne must have died. Helen<br />

^<br />

<strong>Wedderburn</strong> married, (ii.), at I Unidee 20 Aug. 1 657 (by banns 27 July)<br />

Bertone Behone (Barten, Bartholomew or Bertrame, Bilson or<br />

Wilson?), Inglishman, merchant (D.M- 6). Their marriage contract,<br />

dated 15 Aug., is still extant (Bl P. 26), and by it Helen is bound<br />

to <strong>in</strong>feft her husband <strong>in</strong> her half <strong>of</strong> lier fa<strong>the</strong>r's property, sas<strong>in</strong>e<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> contract be<strong>in</strong>g given to him 2.5 Jan. 1660 (S.W<br />

336; D.P.B. 484).= Helen died <strong>in</strong> March 1660. her will be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

given up by her husljand and confirmed at Brech<strong>in</strong> 2 Jan. 1662<br />

(Br.T. H).-* Sixm after this. 4 May <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same year, he made a<br />

disposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North Argylegait property to Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gennie to take efi'ect <strong>in</strong> event <strong>of</strong> his hav<strong>in</strong>g no children<br />

' This shows conclusively that not only Jiime.s him.self but .ilsn Iiia ynunper brotliers, Peter and William<br />

had died without male issue, ns by Scotch law <strong>the</strong> heiibhip would have fallen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first place to<br />

<strong>the</strong> male issue <strong>of</strong> tlie deceased's younger bro<strong>the</strong>rs. See ante, p 96. n. 2.<br />

' Synopsis <strong>of</strong> Keferences :—S.W. 3:jrf.'3:3S ; Kl.P. 26 ; D P.li. 477. 481. -JSJ, -499, 501, 5^5, 531, ."irs D.B R<br />

• '<br />

456. 460, 462, 464 ai, 470; D.Dec. 7 ;<br />

U..M. 6 : K A.n. 1S4 ; lirT. U.<br />

' She is also named with her husbaud '.'8 May 1659, when <strong>the</strong>y get a decree for possession <strong>of</strong> a house <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Overgail (D.B. It. 470).<br />

* The will names no children, and she would seem to have d. s p. Her husband's disposition <strong>of</strong> 4 May<br />

1662 (see above) is consistent with his contemplat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> jKissibility <strong>of</strong> a second marriage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!