Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
134 THE WEDDERBUILV BOOK.<br />
Sir Thomas Fairfax, Knight, Genenil <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Forces raised by <strong>the</strong> Parhameiit.<br />
Suffer <strong>the</strong> bearer tliere49, when Doctor Barwick,<br />
afterwards Uean <strong>of</strong> St. Paul's, who was entrusted with <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
k<strong>in</strong>g's correspondence with his friends iu Eugland, be<strong>in</strong>g seized with a consumption<br />
that threatened to be fatal, " <strong>the</strong> <strong>ca</strong>re <strong>of</strong> his health was wholly entrusted to his<br />
dearest friend Dr. John Wcdderburn <strong>of</strong> Scotland, who, as he was formerly physician<br />
to <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g, so was he afterwards most deservedly dist<strong>in</strong>guished with <strong>the</strong> lionour<strong>of</strong><br />
knighthood " [Life <strong>of</strong> Dr. Baririck, p. 117). It is said that "dur<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><br />
this worthy div<strong>in</strong>e's sickness and cont<strong>in</strong>cment iu <strong>the</strong> Tower, Dr <strong>Wedderburn</strong> showed<br />
great address <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g's bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> Eugland and was very<br />
<strong>in</strong>strumental with his majesty's o<strong>the</strong>r friends <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> Restoration. "-<br />
There is also a letter dated 9 June <strong>in</strong> that year, and addressed by his nephew,<br />
Peter <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, to his tmcle <strong>in</strong> London. There would seem to<br />
have been some difficulty as to <strong>the</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> his peusion from <strong>the</strong> Exchequer,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> doctor must have written on <strong>the</strong> matter to his friend <strong>the</strong> Marquis <strong>of</strong> Argylc,<br />
<strong>the</strong>n at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rul<strong>in</strong>g faction <strong>in</strong> Scotland. Peter <strong>Wedderburn</strong> writes thus :<br />
Mr. pKirclay liath e.xpressed to me a great deall <strong>of</strong> Kespect and Desijre to serve you aud made<br />
me witness to <strong>the</strong> delyvery <strong>of</strong> y" to my Lord Argyle who receaved it verie kyndlie and promised<br />
to befriend you. Asyet <strong>the</strong> Parliament liath not detenn<strong>in</strong>ed how to regulat <strong>the</strong> Exchequer but<br />
after <strong>the</strong>y have nom<strong>in</strong>ateil <strong>the</strong> Commissioners I shall prosecute it farder albeit I fear to no purpose,<br />
for all struggle to make <strong>the</strong>ir be.^t <strong>of</strong> ane evill aud uucertaiue tymo.<br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r or no <strong>the</strong> pension was paid does not appear ; but most probabljit<br />
was allowed to rema<strong>in</strong> iu abeyance, as, on <strong>the</strong> Restoration, <strong>the</strong> doctor got ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
writ, 28 June 1661, cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to him <strong>the</strong> grant <strong>of</strong> 1648 (Bi. 81j. Meanwhile<br />
his adherence to <strong>the</strong> royal <strong>ca</strong>use is shown by an entry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> " Calewlar<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Committee for Compound<strong>in</strong>g, 1643-60,"^ where <strong>the</strong>re is an entry "21 March<br />
1650, John <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, M.D., compounds for del<strong>in</strong>quency <strong>in</strong> adher<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> late<br />
k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first war for which he has never been sequestered ; 22 March, f<strong>in</strong>e, £10."<br />
He was <strong>in</strong> Loudon iu 165.5, as appears from a letter (Bl. 37), dated 22 Jan.<br />
<strong>in</strong> that year, aud, accord<strong>in</strong>g to an old endorsement on it, written by Dr. Thomas<br />
Gleg to Sir Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Blackness, " when <strong>in</strong> England with his<br />
uncle, <strong>the</strong> doctor," and <strong>in</strong> 1657 was <strong>in</strong> Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, where, 26 Felj., he witnessed<br />
<strong>the</strong> baptism <strong>of</strong> John, son to his nephew Peter <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Agnes Dicksone<br />
(Ed.B. 4).<br />
Upon <strong>the</strong> Restoration, he was appo<strong>in</strong>ted Physician to <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g, by whom he<br />
was also knighted and from whom he received a confirmation <strong>of</strong> his pension<br />
' This is quoted (BI. 81) as a pension <strong>of</strong> 2,000 merks, but <strong>the</strong> Register <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal makes it clear<br />
that it was £2,000.<br />
» This is so stated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> MS. Genealngi<strong>ca</strong>l Arcount <strong>of</strong> Lord Lnwihborowjh (Bl. 81).<br />
» This is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state record publi<strong>ca</strong>tions, 1891, p. 2230 ;<br />
P.E. 218, 43j, 43S.