03.05.2015 Views

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

Wedderburn book; a history of the Wedderburns in ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 THE WEDDERBUILV BOOK.<br />

Sir Thomas Fairfax, Knight, Genenil <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Forces raised by <strong>the</strong> Parhameiit.<br />

Suffer <strong>the</strong> bearer tliere49, when Doctor Barwick,<br />

afterwards Uean <strong>of</strong> St. Paul's, who was entrusted with <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>g's correspondence with his friends iu Eugland, be<strong>in</strong>g seized with a consumption<br />

that threatened to be fatal, " <strong>the</strong> <strong>ca</strong>re <strong>of</strong> his health was wholly entrusted to his<br />

dearest friend Dr. John Wcdderburn <strong>of</strong> Scotland, who, as he was formerly physician<br />

to <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g, so was he afterwards most deservedly dist<strong>in</strong>guished with <strong>the</strong> lionour<strong>of</strong><br />

knighthood " [Life <strong>of</strong> Dr. Baririck, p. 117). It is said that "dur<strong>in</strong>g all <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong><br />

this worthy div<strong>in</strong>e's sickness and cont<strong>in</strong>cment iu <strong>the</strong> Tower, Dr <strong>Wedderburn</strong> showed<br />

great address <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g's bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> Eugland and was very<br />

<strong>in</strong>strumental with his majesty's o<strong>the</strong>r friends <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> Restoration. "-<br />

There is also a letter dated 9 June <strong>in</strong> that year, and addressed by his nephew,<br />

Peter <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, to his tmcle <strong>in</strong> London. There would seem to<br />

have been some difficulty as to <strong>the</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> his peusion from <strong>the</strong> Exchequer,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> doctor must have written on <strong>the</strong> matter to his friend <strong>the</strong> Marquis <strong>of</strong> Argylc,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n at <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rul<strong>in</strong>g faction <strong>in</strong> Scotland. Peter <strong>Wedderburn</strong> writes thus :<br />

Mr. pKirclay liath e.xpressed to me a great deall <strong>of</strong> Kespect and Desijre to serve you aud made<br />

me witness to <strong>the</strong> delyvery <strong>of</strong> y" to my Lord Argyle who receaved it verie kyndlie and promised<br />

to befriend you. Asyet <strong>the</strong> Parliament liath not detenn<strong>in</strong>ed how to regulat <strong>the</strong> Exchequer but<br />

after <strong>the</strong>y have nom<strong>in</strong>ateil <strong>the</strong> Commissioners I shall prosecute it farder albeit I fear to no purpose,<br />

for all struggle to make <strong>the</strong>ir be.^t <strong>of</strong> ane evill aud uucertaiue tymo.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r or no <strong>the</strong> pension was paid does not appear ; but most probabljit<br />

was allowed to rema<strong>in</strong> iu abeyance, as, on <strong>the</strong> Restoration, <strong>the</strong> doctor got ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

writ, 28 June 1661, cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to him <strong>the</strong> grant <strong>of</strong> 1648 (Bi. 81j. Meanwhile<br />

his adherence to <strong>the</strong> royal <strong>ca</strong>use is shown by an entry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> " Calewlar<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Committee for Compound<strong>in</strong>g, 1643-60,"^ where <strong>the</strong>re is an entry "21 March<br />

1650, John <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, M.D., compounds for del<strong>in</strong>quency <strong>in</strong> adher<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> late<br />

k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first war for which he has never been sequestered ; 22 March, f<strong>in</strong>e, £10."<br />

He was <strong>in</strong> Loudon iu 165.5, as appears from a letter (Bl. 37), dated 22 Jan.<br />

<strong>in</strong> that year, aud, accord<strong>in</strong>g to an old endorsement on it, written by Dr. Thomas<br />

Gleg to Sir Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Blackness, " when <strong>in</strong> England with his<br />

uncle, <strong>the</strong> doctor," and <strong>in</strong> 1657 was <strong>in</strong> Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, where, 26 Felj., he witnessed<br />

<strong>the</strong> baptism <strong>of</strong> John, son to his nephew Peter <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Agnes Dicksone<br />

(Ed.B. 4).<br />

Upon <strong>the</strong> Restoration, he was appo<strong>in</strong>ted Physician to <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g, by whom he<br />

was also knighted and from whom he received a confirmation <strong>of</strong> his pension<br />

' This is quoted (BI. 81) as a pension <strong>of</strong> 2,000 merks, but <strong>the</strong> Register <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Privy Seal makes it clear<br />

that it was £2,000.<br />

» This is so stated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> MS. Genealngi<strong>ca</strong>l Arcount <strong>of</strong> Lord Lnwihborowjh (Bl. 81).<br />

» This is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state record publi<strong>ca</strong>tions, 1891, p. 2230 ;<br />

P.E. 218, 43j, 43S.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!