Heinzer, Tom, Sehbat, Michael, Feinberg, Bruce, and Kerper, Dale. 2000. TheUse of GIS to Manage LIDAR Elevation Data and Facilitate Integrationwith the MIKE21 2-D Hydraulic Model in a <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Inundation</strong> DecisionSupport System. Proceedings of the 2000 ESRI users’ internationalconference. San Diego, CA, June 2000.Huang B., and Jiang B. 2002. AVTOP: a Full Integration of TOPMODEL <strong>into</strong>GIS. Environmental Modelling and Software, Volume 17, pp. 261-268.Jonge, Tineke De (Delft Hydraulics); Kok, Matthijs; and Hogeweg, Marten.1996. Modelling floods and damage assessment using GIS. Application ofGeographic Information Systems in Hydrology and Water ResourcesManagement, IAHS Publication (International Association ofHydrological Sciences), Volume 235, pp. 299-306.Maidment, D. R. 1993. GIS and Hydrologic Modeling. In EnvironmentalModeling with GIS, edited <strong>by</strong> Goodchild M.F., Parks B.O., and SteyaertL.T., New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 147-167.Maidment, D. R. 2002. Arc Hydro-GIS for water resources. ESRI Press,Redlands, California.Muller, H. G., and Rungoe, M. 1995. Integrating <strong>Flood</strong>plain Management andNumerical Modeling using ArcView. Proc., 15th Annu. ESRI User Conf.,Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.Nelson, E. J. 2000. WMS v6.0 Reference Manual. Environmental ModelingResearch Laboratory, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, pp. 487.Noman N. S., Nelson E. J., and Zundel A. K. 2001. Review of Automated<strong>Flood</strong>plain Delineation from Digital Terrain Models. Journal of WaterResources Planning and Management., Volume 127, No. 6, pp. 394-402.Obenour D., Maidment, D., Evans, T., Yates D., 2004. An Interface Data Modelfor HEC-HMS. AWRA Spring Specialty Conference, May 17-19, 2004,Nashville, Tennessee.Olivera, F., and Maidment, D. R. 2000. GIS Tools for HMS modeling support.Chapter 5, Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographicinformation systems, D.R. Maidment and D. Djokic, eds., ESRI Press, SanDiego, Calif.220
Olsen R. J., Beling, P. A., Lambert, J. H., and Haimes, Y. Y. 1998. Input-OutputEconomic Evaluation of System of Levees. Journal of Water ResourcesPlanning and Management, Volume 124, No. 5, pp. 237-245.Penning-Rowsell, E. C., and Chatterton, J. B. 1977. The Benefits of <strong>Flood</strong>Alleviation: A Manual of Assessment Techniques, Gower PublishingCompany Limited, Aldershot, England.Raman V., Crone C., Haas L., Malaika S., Mukai T., Wolfson D., and Baru C.2002. Data Access and Management Services on Grid.http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/grid-db/papers/dams.pdf, pp. 1-24.Reed, S., Maidment, D. R. 1999. Coordinate Transformations for Using<strong>NEXRAD</strong> Data in GIS-based Hydrologic Modeling. Journal ofHydrologic Engineering, Volume 4, No. 2, pp. 174-182.Reitsma, R. F., Sautins, A. M., and Wehrend, S. C. 1994. Construction kit forvisual programming of river-basin models. Journal of Computing in CivilEngineering, ASCE, Volume 8, No. 3, pp. 378-384.Runge, Morten, and Olesen, Kim Wium. 2003. Combined one- and twodimensionalflood modeling. Fourth Iranian Hydraulic Conference, 21-23October, Shiraz, Iran.Sinha S. K., Sotiropoulos F., and Odgaard A. J. 1998. Three-dimensionalnumerical model for flow through natural rivers. Journal of HydraulicEngineering. Volume 124, No. 1, pp. 13-24.Snead, Daniel, B. 2000. Development and application of unsteady flood modelsusing geographic information systems. Departmental Report. TheUniversity of Texas at Austin. Center for Research in Water Resourcesonline report 00-12. Southwest Florida Water Management District’s Watershed ManagementProgram Guidelines and Specifications. 2002.Sui, D. Z., and Maggio, R. C. 1999. Integrating GIS with hydrological modeling:practices, problems, and prospects. Computers, Environment and UrbanSystems., Volume 23, pp. 33-51.221
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsList of Figures ..
- Page 5 and 6:
4.1.12 The XML2GDB Script Tool ....
- Page 7 and 8:
Figure 3.24 Components of a Steady
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 4.50 Create Flood Inundation
- Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 Introduction1.1 BACKGROUN
- Page 13 and 14:
for undeveloped or natural conditio
- Page 15 and 16:
All the previous statements favor t
- Page 17 and 18:
science, and engineering models as
- Page 19 and 20:
Different approaches have been used
- Page 21 and 22:
generic and self-described formats,
- Page 23 and 24:
externally executed from a central
- Page 25 and 26:
though GIS-based, the system does n
- Page 27 and 28:
Geographic Information Systems, Arc
- Page 29 and 30:
By defining the three basic functio
- Page 31 and 32:
containing an inventory of damage s
- Page 33 and 34:
Data Models in charge of storing an
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 3.1 Floodplain Modeling Sche
- Page 37 and 38:
either with Schematic Nodes (for Su
- Page 39 and 40:
channel cross sections, available H
- Page 41 and 42:
sequential data, called pathnames,
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 3.5 NEXRAD square cells (873
- Page 45 and 46:
geodatabase formatted with the Arc
- Page 47 and 48:
The CrossSection feature class in A
- Page 49 and 50:
geodatabase (under Arc Hydro format
- Page 51 and 52:
3.4.4 External Execution of HEC-RAS
- Page 53 and 54:
analysis. In particular, GIS has be
- Page 55 and 56:
3.5.3 Model-Specific ElementsA geog
- Page 57 and 58:
Figure 3.11 Geographic and Hydrolog
- Page 59 and 60:
For HEC-RAS, the connectivity is ac
- Page 61 and 62:
cross sections in the hydraulic mod
- Page 63 and 64:
Section line for a RAS cross-sectio
- Page 65 and 66:
from the geodatabase back into the
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 3.19 Relationship Classes fo
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 3.20 DSS Time Series content
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 3.22 Extended Time Series Co
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 3.23 Creating a Flow File fr
- Page 75 and 76:
etween the HEC-DSS file system and
- Page 77 and 78:
The more specific steps for the pos
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 4 Map2Map Components4.1 MOD
- Page 81 and 82:
A subset of NEXRAD time series data
- Page 83 and 84:
A folder location is also provided
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 4.4 Radar2GDB Model Componen
- Page 87 and 88:
ecords. Figure 4.6 illustrates the
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 4.8 Time Series Tables and R
- Page 91 and 92:
having different formats and that a
- Page 93 and 94:
Part E: Time Interval of stored dat
- Page 95 and 96:
execution time and for their corres
- Page 97 and 98:
on the steps needed to transfer the
- Page 99 and 100:
Len_sBTime (I): The length of the s
- Page 101 and 102:
52: Invalid precision exponent spec
- Page 103 and 104:
methods: user hyetograph, user gage
- Page 105 and 106:
Once the hyetograph is defined (for
- Page 107 and 108:
The resulting runoff hydrograph is
- Page 109 and 110:
Thus, the time period for the entir
- Page 111 and 112:
After the ZSRTS subroutine is execu
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 4.12 HMSCaller Model Compone
- Page 115 and 116:
ased on a process handle (a program
- Page 117 and 118:
These simple command line statement
- Page 119 and 120:
To programmatically accomplish this
- Page 121 and 122:
to provide the hydraulic input for
- Page 123 and 124:
information into the extended Arc H
- Page 125 and 126:
The HydroJunction, used for connect
- Page 127 and 128:
Once the identification of flow cha
- Page 129 and 130:
As with the GDB2HMSDSS, the first t
- Page 131 and 132:
4.1.7 Time Series ExtractionOnce th
- Page 133 and 134:
accomplish this have been developed
- Page 135 and 136:
straight forward for all time stamp
- Page 137 and 138:
As opposed to HEC-DSS, the Arc Hydr
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 4.4: Variable Type Equivalenc
- Page 141 and 142:
ZCAT DSS subroutines) and stored in
- Page 143 and 144:
Table 4.5: Time Interval Equivalenc
- Page 145 and 146:
There are not specific valid values
- Page 147 and 148:
catalog list. For the DSS2GDB appli
- Page 149 and 150:
4.1.9.1 Opening the HEC-DSS fileThe
- Page 151 and 152:
channel (the hydraulic representati
- Page 153 and 154:
the model if the new configuration
- Page 155 and 156:
the main program as a public module
- Page 157 and 158:
Then, the RASCaller application acc
- Page 159 and 160:
Figure 4.31 ProjectName Property in
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 4.33 RunSteady Method in RAS
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 4.34 ExportGIS Method in RAS
- Page 165 and 166:
data structures delivered by every
- Page 167 and 168:
The two most well-known models for
- Page 169 and 170:
The water surface elevations obtain
- Page 171 and 172:
Once the water surface elevations f
- Page 173 and 174:
Generate a suitable water surface m
- Page 175 and 176:
Figure 4.42 2 Foot-Contour Lines fo
- Page 177 and 178:
Figure 4.43 Rosillo Creek’s terra
- Page 179 and 180: standard ArcGIS tool), is used in M
- Page 181 and 182: By doing this, the water surface el
- Page 183 and 184: Figure 4.49 Create Flood Polygon Mo
- Page 185 and 186: Int OperationThe Integer operation
- Page 187 and 188: case that was developed for Map2Map
- Page 189 and 190: contours (isohyetals) or by interpo
- Page 191 and 192: design storm input given its possib
- Page 193 and 194: Figure 4.55 Workflow for Extracting
- Page 195 and 196: for it. Finally, the DigitalStorm2H
- Page 197 and 198: model for water resources (Maidment
- Page 199 and 200: Hydro, the HydroJunctionHasCrossSec
- Page 201 and 202: involved in the transformation of r
- Page 203 and 204: process model in sequence. For the
- Page 205 and 206: 5.6 A TRUE SPATIAL APPROACHAutomate
- Page 207 and 208: time series between NEXRAD, the HEC
- Page 209 and 210: value of the entire runoff hydrogra
- Page 211 and 212: case study. Bigger watersheds (abov
- Page 213 and 214: The first step consists in installi
- Page 215 and 216: 3.7 Map2Map UsageAll of the model b
- Page 217 and 218: Congratulations! You have successfu
- Page 219 and 220: Once the simplified version of Arc
- Page 221 and 222: cells that cover your study area an
- Page 223 and 224: Second, the user needs to modify th
- Page 225 and 226: Appendix BMap2Map CD Content1 CD Da
- Page 227 and 228: o hmsproj - contains folders with H
- Page 229: Goodchild, M.F., Steyaert, L.T., an
- Page 233 and 234: Werner, M. G. F. 2001. Impact of gr