10.07.2015 Views

The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly

The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly

The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MARCH 13, 1758127<strong>The</strong> 22d, No. 279, on Edward Leggs Account was disagreed with by <strong>the</strong><strong>House</strong>.Resolved that £19:9:4 1 ⁄2 be provided for <strong>the</strong> Said Edward Legg.To <strong>the</strong> 23d, No. 280, on an Account <strong>of</strong> Christopher Rowe,<strong>The</strong> 24th, No. 281, on Jonathan Scotts Account,<strong>The</strong> 25th, No. 282, on an Account <strong>of</strong> Elizabeth Mercier,<strong>The</strong> 26th, No. 283, on John Coones Account,<strong>The</strong> 27th, No. 284, on Richard Berresfords Account,<strong>The</strong> 28th, No. 285, on Thomas Heywards Account,<strong>The</strong> 29th, No. 286, on James Crokatts Account,<strong>The</strong> 30th, No. 287, and <strong>The</strong> 31st, No. 288, on two Accounts <strong>of</strong> SamuelWood,<strong>The</strong> 32d, No. 289, on an order in favour <strong>of</strong> James Beamer,<strong>The</strong> 33d, No. 290, on an Order in favour <strong>of</strong> Jacob Glauphenburgh,<strong>The</strong> 34th, No. 291, on an Order in favour <strong>of</strong> Adam Keiler,<strong>The</strong> 35th, No. 292, on an Order in favour <strong>of</strong> Michael Calfskin,<strong>The</strong> 36th, No. 293, on Thomas Brickles Account,<strong>The</strong> 37th, No. 294, on John Stone’s Account and,<strong>The</strong> 38th, No. 295, on John Channing’s Account were Severally Agreedto by <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong>.<strong>The</strong> 39th, No. 296, on an Account <strong>of</strong> John Savage, was recomitted.<strong>The</strong> 40th, No. 297, on an Account <strong>of</strong> James Neilson was agreed to by <strong>the</strong><strong>House</strong>.<strong>The</strong> 41st, No. 298, on an Account <strong>of</strong> Benjamin Stead, was upon <strong>the</strong> Questionbeing put <strong>the</strong>reupon disagreed with by <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong>.Ordered that <strong>the</strong> said Account be recommitted.<strong>The</strong> 42d, No. 299, on an Account <strong>of</strong> Samuel Wyley,<strong>The</strong> 43d, No. 300, on an Account <strong>of</strong> James Wright Esqr.,<strong>The</strong> 44th, No. 301, on an Account <strong>of</strong> David Graeme Esqr. were SeverallyAgreed to by <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong>.Ordered that <strong>the</strong> far<strong>the</strong>r Consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Report be adjourned.And <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong> upon <strong>the</strong> Question adjourned till Tomorrow afternoon,Five <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Clock.Saturday <strong>the</strong> 11th <strong>of</strong> March 1758. P.M.Mr. Speaker adjourned <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong> till Monday afternoon Five o’Clock.Monday <strong>the</strong> 13th <strong>of</strong> March 1758. P.M.Mr. Speaker Adjourned <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong> till Tomorrow Morning Ten <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Clock.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!