10.07.2015 Views

The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly

The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly

The Journal of the Commons House of Assembly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DECEMBER 9, 175755Assent in Council an ingrosed Bill intitled “an Act establishing certain Regulationsconcerning His Majestys Forces in <strong>the</strong> Province <strong>of</strong> South Carolina &to prevent <strong>the</strong>ir desertion. And for <strong>the</strong> better Carrying on his Majestys Servicein <strong>the</strong> said Province.” On which his Excellency was pleased to say “I willConsider <strong>of</strong> it.” 5And that Mr. Speaker also presented to his Excellency for his Assentano<strong>the</strong>r ingrossed Bill, intitled “an Act for forming & establishing an artilleryCompany <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Militia in Charles Town.” On which his Excellency wasalso pleased to Say “I will Consider <strong>of</strong> it.” 6Order’d That a Message be sent to <strong>the</strong> Governor, humbly to desire hisExcellencys Leave to this <strong>House</strong> to adjourn till Monday <strong>the</strong> 16th <strong>of</strong> Januarynext. And that Mr. Middleton & Mr. Roper do wait upon his Excellency with<strong>the</strong> Message.Mr. Middleton reported to <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong> that his Excellency having beenwaited upon pursuant to <strong>the</strong>ir Order had been pleased to Give <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong>Leave to adjourn according to <strong>the</strong>ir desire.And <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> <strong>House</strong> adjournd till Monday <strong>the</strong> 16th day <strong>of</strong> January next.Return to contents ➔5Lyttelton told <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Trade that he vetoed this bill “because <strong>the</strong> preamble sets forth ‘Thatit is impracticable to quarter or Billet Soldiers in this province for want <strong>of</strong> Inns Taverns Victualling <strong>House</strong>sand o<strong>the</strong>r such <strong>House</strong>s as Soldiers are quartered in by <strong>the</strong> Laws <strong>of</strong> Great Britain’ which preamble I conceivedwas meant to be a kind <strong>of</strong> Parliamentary Declaration that Troops should never be quartered orBilleted here upon private <strong>House</strong>s.” Also, <strong>the</strong> bill contained an expiration clause that kept it in force foronly one year. Lyttelton’s royal instructions forbade him to sign any short-term laws. See Records in <strong>the</strong>British Public Record Office relating to South Carolina, SC Archives (hereinafter cited as BPRO Transcripts;<strong>the</strong>se records have been published as SC Archives Microcopy No. 1), 27: 346.6<strong>The</strong> Upper <strong>House</strong> had tried to prevent Lyttelton’s veto <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> artillery bill, but it could notpersuade <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commons</strong> <strong>House</strong> to discard an obnoxious preamble: “And be it Enacted that His Excellency<strong>the</strong> Governor or <strong>the</strong> Commander in Chief <strong>of</strong> this Province for <strong>the</strong> time being shall be and he is and <strong>the</strong>yare hereby Authorized and impowered from amongst <strong>the</strong> Inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parishes <strong>of</strong> St. Philip and St.Michaels Charles Town who have sufficient substance to undergo <strong>the</strong> Charge and will Voluntarily enterand enlist to form an Artillery Company not exceeding <strong>the</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> 72 private Men and to appoint andCommission proper Officers to Muster train and exercise <strong>the</strong> said Company in <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Cannon as wellas small Arms not exceeding twelve times and not less than Eight in a year at Charles Town aforesaid.”Obviously, Lyttelton would not sign a legislative act that usurped <strong>the</strong> prerogative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crown. See above,p. 71, and BPRO Transcripts, 27: 347.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!