12.07.2015 Views

Alexander : a history of the origin and growth of the art of war from ...

Alexander : a history of the origin and growth of the art of war from ...

Alexander : a history of the origin and growth of the art of war from ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 GREEK VERSUS MODERN LOSSES.thous<strong>and</strong> men, seventeen per cent. ; in battalions <strong>of</strong> five hundredmen, twenty-two per cent. This makes no account <strong>of</strong>wounds whatever, even mortal ones.only to very stubbornly fought battles.These percentages applyThe average battle,even if severe, falls far short <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se losses.Among <strong>the</strong> Greeks only <strong>the</strong> losses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> victors can fairlybe counted. The vanquished were invariably massacred.Should we count both, <strong>the</strong> Greek losses in killed would bemany times those <strong>of</strong> our battles. But, in an occasional battle<strong>of</strong> ancient days, <strong>the</strong> losses in killed, quite ap<strong>art</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> massacrefollowing defeat, were far higher than anything shownin modern <strong>war</strong>fare. At Megalopolis <strong>the</strong> Macedonian victorslost nine per cent, in killed, twice <strong>the</strong> loss at Waterloo, two<strong>and</strong> a half times that at Gettysburg. In <strong>the</strong> average Greekbattle, <strong>the</strong> killed were usually fewer than inmodern actions.H<strong>and</strong>-weapons were less deadly than musket-balls ; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>men wore armor <strong>and</strong> carried shields, which were a reasonablygood protection against spears, arrows <strong>and</strong> stones.wounded were numerous.TheIn <strong>Alex<strong>and</strong>er</strong>'s combats <strong>the</strong>y averageten or twelve to one <strong>of</strong> killed, <strong>of</strong>ten twenty. Nowadays,about seven to one is <strong>the</strong> ratio. On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> killed alone,<strong>Alex<strong>and</strong>er</strong>'s battles were not so deadly as ours ; on <strong>the</strong> basis<strong>of</strong> killed <strong>and</strong> wounded, <strong>the</strong>y were not far <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> same.If we take a general casualty-list composed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> killed<strong>and</strong> wounded in celebrated battles, we shall find thatNapoleon, in nine battles, lost, in each, about 22 per cent.Frederick, in eight battles, lost, in each, about .... 18^ per cent.The Confederates, in eleven battles, lost, in each, about . 14 per cent.The Unionists, in eleven battles, lost, in each, about . . 13 per cent.The Germans, in eight battles, lost, in each, about . . .11^ per cent.The English, in four battles, lost, in each, about .... 10per cent.The Austrians, in nine battles, lost, in each, about ... 10 per cent.The French, in nine battles, lost, in each, about .... 9 per cent.These figures are a good gauge to measure by.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!