countries, provides <strong>in</strong>formation on important diseases <strong>in</strong> the Asia-Pacific region and also serves as an earlywarn<strong>in</strong>g system for emerg<strong>in</strong>g pathogens (e.g. KHV, TSV).Emergency Preparedness and Cont<strong>in</strong>gency Plann<strong>in</strong>g:A disease emergency exists when a population <strong>of</strong> aquatic animals is recognized as undergo<strong>in</strong>g severe mortalityevents, or there is otherwise an emerg<strong>in</strong>g disease threat where urgent action is required. Infectious diseaseemergencies may arise <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> ways, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>troductions <strong>of</strong> known exotic diseases, sudden changes<strong>in</strong> the pattern <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g endemic diseases, or the appearance <strong>of</strong> previously unrecognized diseases.A cont<strong>in</strong>gency plan is an agreed management strategy and set <strong>of</strong> operational procedures that would be adopted <strong>in</strong>the event <strong>of</strong> an aquatic animal disease emergency. This should be developed dur<strong>in</strong>g “peace time” (i.e. not at time<strong>of</strong> emergencies). When there is an emergency, the response should proceed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the plans that havebeen developed. For effectively deal<strong>in</strong>g with aquatic animal health emergencies, governments should have thecapability to develop cont<strong>in</strong>gency plans and build the required operational capacity to effectively implement theplan. Through a well-documented cont<strong>in</strong>gency action plan agreed upon by all major stakeholders, it would bepossible to m<strong>in</strong>imize the impact <strong>of</strong> an aquatic animal disease emergency. Mere establishment <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency planwithout appropriate skills and capacity development would be <strong>of</strong> little value.The aim <strong>of</strong> early warn<strong>in</strong>g is to allow the recognition <strong>of</strong> a potential threat and a rapid detection <strong>of</strong> a diseaseemergency. For establish<strong>in</strong>g an effective early warn<strong>in</strong>g program, a strong technical capability is fundamental <strong>in</strong> theareas <strong>of</strong> disease diagnostics, disease surveillance, epidemiological analysis, aquatic animal health <strong>in</strong>formationsystems, national and <strong>in</strong>ternational disease report<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>formation communication and shar<strong>in</strong>g. Early responseis identified as all actions that would be targeted at rapid and effective eradication/conta<strong>in</strong>ment/mitigation <strong>of</strong> anemergency disease outbreak. The responses may be <strong>of</strong> different types depend<strong>in</strong>g on the disease agent and thelikely impact. Operational capabilities at different levels (farm/village/prov<strong>in</strong>ce/national) is vital to mount aneffective early response.Quarant<strong>in</strong>e and Health Certification:Quarant<strong>in</strong>e is def<strong>in</strong>ed as ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a group <strong>of</strong> live aquatic animals <strong>in</strong> isolation with no direct contact with otheraquatic animals, <strong>in</strong> order to undergo observation for a specified length <strong>of</strong> time and, if appropriate, conduct<strong>in</strong>g testsand treatment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g proper treatment <strong>of</strong> the waste waters. Quarant<strong>in</strong>e process <strong>in</strong>volves pre-border, borderand post-border activities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, pre-movement certification, movement, conf<strong>in</strong>ement on arrival, check<strong>in</strong>gdur<strong>in</strong>g conf<strong>in</strong>ement, releases, and subsequent monitor<strong>in</strong>g as appropriate. The purpose <strong>of</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g quarant<strong>in</strong>emeasures is to facilitate trans-boundary trade <strong>in</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g aquatic animals, while m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the risk <strong>of</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>fectious diseases. An effective system <strong>of</strong> quarant<strong>in</strong>e measures also <strong>in</strong>creases protection <strong>of</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>gresources (e.g., harvest fisheries, non-exploited species and other components <strong>of</strong> the environment).Health Certificate is a certificate issued by the Competent Authority <strong>of</strong> the export<strong>in</strong>g country attest<strong>in</strong>g to the healthstatus <strong>of</strong> a consignment <strong>of</strong> live aquatic animals. A Health Certificate is a legal document which is used especiallyfor the purpose <strong>of</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g quarant<strong>in</strong>e measures <strong>in</strong> trans-boundary trade <strong>of</strong> live aquatic animals and theirproducts, for m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the risk <strong>of</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectious diseases. Health certification is also one <strong>of</strong> the strategiesaimed to protect the natural environment and native fauna from the deleterious impacts <strong>of</strong> exotic species and/ordiseases. Because <strong>of</strong> the diversity <strong>of</strong> species, the purposes for which the aquatic animals are be<strong>in</strong>g traded(import-export, local market), and other variable factors, HC should be comprehensive and be able toaccommodate all the required <strong>in</strong>formation. Model health certificates are provided <strong>in</strong> the OIE CodeImport Risk Analysis:The importation <strong>of</strong> live aquatic animals always <strong>in</strong>volves a degree <strong>of</strong> disease risk to the import<strong>in</strong>g country. ImportRisk Analysis (IRA) is the process by which hazards (e.g. pathogens) associated with the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> a19
particular animal are identified, the paths and likelihood <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction and establishment are described,consequences are def<strong>in</strong>ed and management options are assessed. The results <strong>of</strong> these analyses arecommunicated to the Competent Authority and stakeholders (Importer/exporter). Typical risk analysis process<strong>in</strong>volves four components: hazard identification, risk assessment, risk management and risk communication.Import decisions based on scientific risk analysis will m<strong>in</strong>imize the risk <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g exotic pathogens to thecountry.Zon<strong>in</strong>g:Zon<strong>in</strong>g is a program for del<strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g areas with<strong>in</strong> countries on the basis <strong>of</strong> aquatic animal disease status. Theadvantage <strong>of</strong> zon<strong>in</strong>g is that it allows for part <strong>of</strong> a nation’s territory to be identified as free <strong>of</strong> a particular disease,rather than hav<strong>in</strong>g to demonstrate that the entire country is free. In the past, outbreaks <strong>of</strong> disease could impact ontrade from the entire country, but by zon<strong>in</strong>g, restrictions may only apply to animals and products from the <strong>in</strong>fectedarea. Zon<strong>in</strong>g is particularly helpful for diseases where eradication is not a feasible option.Bio-security at farm levelBiosecurity refers to approaches taken to prevent, control and eradicate serious diseases <strong>of</strong> concern to thecultured species. Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> biosecurity are normally considered for only dangerous pathogens. For any diseaseto occur, the pathogen should be able to ga<strong>in</strong> entry <strong>in</strong>to the culture system, through air, water, or land. Biosecuritymeasures implemented at the farm level should have the broad objective <strong>of</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g the entry, establishment,proliferation and spread <strong>of</strong> dangerous pathogens. Farm level biosecurity can be broadly def<strong>in</strong>ed as sets <strong>of</strong>standard practice that will reduce the probability <strong>of</strong> pathogen <strong>in</strong>troduction to the culture system, its amplification <strong>in</strong>the culture environment and cultured host lead<strong>in</strong>g to disease outbreak and subsequent spread. To achieve, foolpro<strong>of</strong> bio-security, it is necessary to understand all the routes by which the pathogen ga<strong>in</strong>s entry <strong>in</strong>to culture unitsand the farm level component causes (risk factors) which favor its amplification to levels sufficient to causedisease outbreaks. In the case <strong>of</strong> serious pathogen disease outbreak (e.g. WSSV), damage control should be theonly post-outbreak goal. Isolation <strong>of</strong> affected farm, removal <strong>of</strong> hosts, effective dis<strong>in</strong>fection programs, early warn<strong>in</strong>gsystems and co-operation <strong>of</strong> processors <strong>in</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ation would help to conta<strong>in</strong> the spread <strong>of</strong> thepathogen.Good biosecurity programs with external and <strong>in</strong>ternal barriers are vital to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g healthy animals and toreduc<strong>in</strong>g the risk <strong>of</strong> acquir<strong>in</strong>g diseases <strong>in</strong> a farm. External barriers prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> pathogens onto and <strong>of</strong>f afarm. Internal barriers prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> the pathogen with<strong>in</strong> a farm. Adoption and implementation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<strong>of</strong> good bio-security program can m<strong>in</strong>imise the probability <strong>of</strong> pathogen <strong>in</strong>troduction considerably. Pathogens,which are endemic and well established <strong>in</strong> diverse hosts f<strong>in</strong>d their way <strong>in</strong>to farms, despite the best bio-securitymeasures. It is well known that mere presence <strong>of</strong> pathogen (necessary cause) alone will not lead to diseaseoutbreaks. Identification <strong>of</strong> farm level component causes (risk factors) through epidemiological studies and theireffective management would help prevent disease outbreaks despite the presence <strong>of</strong> the necessary cause.Application <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> biosecurity will depend on the types <strong>of</strong> culture systems. It may be easy to adopt andimplement <strong>in</strong> land based systems which are under cover and <strong>in</strong> closed aquaculture systems. The practicalities <strong>of</strong>apply<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> biosecurity <strong>in</strong> open farm<strong>in</strong>g systems may be difficult and needs to be viewed from a differentperspective. Identification and quantification <strong>of</strong> relative risks associated with each possible route <strong>of</strong> pathogen entry<strong>in</strong>to the farms through epidemiological studies help to target resources only to the ma<strong>in</strong> risks, to make biosecuritymeasures cost effective at the farm level.Bio-security pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for prevent<strong>in</strong>g pathogen entryPossible pathogen carriers <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>fected hosts (e.g. seed, broodstock, vectors, <strong>in</strong>termediate hosts, reservoirhosts), non-host biological carriers (e.g. birds, dogs, <strong>in</strong>sects, other predators, human be<strong>in</strong>gs) and fomites (e.g.20
- Page 1 and 2: Training of TrainersProgramme3-7 Au
- Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents1. Preface 42. Sen
- Page 5 and 6: knowledge about the activities carr
- Page 7 and 8: iosphere, in that it is essentially
- Page 10 and 11: Importance in narrowing the supply
- Page 12 and 13: Figure 7: The trend in aquaculture
- Page 14: aquaculture has been a success thus
- Page 17 and 18: pathogen transfer is generally cons
- Page 19: • It highlights the importance a
- Page 23: Knowledge at the bottom of the pyra
- Page 26 and 27: farmer innovation process. In this
- Page 28 and 29: • Rapport building• Working str
- Page 30 and 31: shrimp farming is undertaken in the
- Page 32 and 33: Reintjes, C and Hiemstra, W. 1989 F
- Page 34 and 35: • An increase in reliable product
- Page 36 and 37: Principles of AACC are to: 1) Facil
- Page 38 and 39: Maintaining genetic quality of fish
- Page 40 and 41: Where F is the percent increase in
- Page 42 and 43: o G=(0.95) 1/10G =0.994883803Figure
- Page 44 and 45: Aquaculture extension and training
- Page 46 and 47: ResearchExtensionFarmersFlow of inf
- Page 48 and 49: view of outside world than before a
- Page 50 and 51: Along with fish sample, the support
- Page 52 and 53: Fungal examinationFungal infection
- Page 54 and 55: few different pathogen strains. The
- Page 56 and 57: Major finfish diseases in Asia and
- Page 58 and 59: A great number and diversity of ani
- Page 60 and 61: • -oxidase test positive• -resi
- Page 62 and 63: ReferencesAustin, B. and D. Austin.
- Page 64 and 65: Accessing better markets-improving
- Page 66 and 67: Owing to its importance in generati
- Page 68 and 69: adopt standards for responsible shr
- Page 70:
Tokrisna R, Benheam W., 1995. Gain
- Page 73 and 74:
of the temperature rise that were d
- Page 75 and 76:
Principles of developing, validatin
- Page 77 and 78:
such as determinants, exposures and
- Page 79 and 80:
How to promote adoption of BMPs?Pro
- Page 81 and 82:
economic sustainability. BMPs need
- Page 83 and 84:
Once you understand your stakeholde
- Page 85 and 86:
As conventional approaches such as
- Page 87 and 88:
Printed publicationsPrinted publica
- Page 89 and 90:
Set up a blog or website for your w
- Page 91 and 92:
If you have a website, all you need
- Page 93 and 94:
ought about increased profits among
- Page 95 and 96:
• It is a farming system the prod
- Page 97 and 98:
Annex 1. The area surveyed for obta
- Page 99 and 100:
contribute substantially to maintai
- Page 101 and 102:
seawater, but in fresh water its le
- Page 103 and 104:
type of ingredients used, since som
- Page 105 and 106:
This is a new approach used to buil
- Page 107 and 108:
New, M.B., A. G. J. Tacon and I. Cs
- Page 109 and 110:
later stages it has become a much m
- Page 111 and 112:
c. Improved information exchange an
- Page 113 and 114:
implemented by both societies. Inte
- Page 115 and 116:
With better informed farmers, the s
- Page 117 and 118:
According to FAO, it is estimated t
- Page 119 and 120:
Farmer organization as models for p
- Page 121 and 122:
NaCSA disseminates BMPs mainly thro
- Page 123 and 124:
1. Drain the pond water completely
- Page 125 and 126:
Seed transportation and Stocking:
- Page 127 and 128:
7. Presently 100% of the society po
- Page 129 and 130:
would help in sustaining shrimp sec
- Page 131 and 132:
Stress brought about by the capture
- Page 133 and 134:
Enhance women participation in aqua
- Page 135 and 136:
women in aquaculture and identify a
- Page 137 and 138:
major percentage of staff, the need
- Page 139 and 140:
having more self confidence through
- Page 141 and 142:
Overall status of men and women in
- Page 143 and 144:
Compliance to international standar
- Page 145 and 146:
(ii) to protect human or animal lif
- Page 147 and 148:
c) FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commi
- Page 149 and 150:
Annex 1: List of participantsCountr
- Page 151 and 152:
Annex 2: AgendaDate Time Presentati
- Page 153:
Annex 3: List of resource persons1.