- Page 2 and 3:
1. UCL JILL DANDO INSTITUTE OF CRIM
- Page 4 and 5:
ContentsAcknowledgementsExecutive s
- Page 6 and 7:
2.5 Illustration of a simple neares
- Page 8 and 9:
Project outcomesPatterns of burglar
- Page 10 and 11:
those that involved collaboration w
- Page 12 and 13:
1. IntroductionThis report represen
- Page 14 and 15:
optimally calibrated system, the go
- Page 16 and 17:
e ij = n .j x n i.nWhere, e ij is t
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 2.2: Knox ratios for Mansfiel
- Page 20 and 21:
Table 2.6: Monte-Carlo results for
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 2.10: Weekly Knox ratios for
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 2.14: Monte-Carlo results for
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 2.1: The five policing areas
- Page 28 and 29:
The results for area 5 again demons
- Page 30 and 31:
The bandwidth used to generate the
- Page 32:
a densely populated urban area this
- Page 35 and 36:
Table 2.24: Average number of crime
- Page 37 and 38:
Patrolling efficiencyAs discussed e
- Page 39 and 40:
3. Tactical options and selecting a
- Page 41 and 42:
Selecting a pilot siteThe decision
- Page 43 and 44:
Table 3.2: Tactical options matrixT
- Page 45 and 46:
Type ofinterventionStudyUse ofintel
- Page 47 and 48:
Other potential tactical optionsAt
- Page 49 and 50:
4. System development and evolution
- Page 51 and 52:
the same time of day as each other
- Page 53 and 54:
unfortunately, implementation or us
- Page 55 and 56:
any tactical options were employed
- Page 57 and 58:
the end of the pilot. In addition t
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 5.1: Promap dissemination pr
- Page 61 and 62: the busy schedule of the new Divisi
- Page 63 and 64: Tactical deliveryCommand Team daily
- Page 65 and 66: Table 5.3: Number of respondents wh
- Page 67 and 68: permitted, up to four plain clothed
- Page 69 and 70: observation made by those who used
- Page 71 and 72: A simple time-series analysis (see
- Page 73 and 74: Two approaches were used to compute
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 6.3: Changes in the proporti
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 6.5: Changes in the proporti
- Page 79 and 80: With respect to implementation real
- Page 81 and 82: ReferencesAggresti, A. (1996) An In
- Page 83 and 84: Johnson, S.D., Summers, L., and Pea
- Page 85 and 86: Appendix 1. The information technol
- Page 87 and 88: Figure A1.2: Stand-alone applicatio
- Page 89 and 90: Recommendations that may be realise
- Page 91 and 92: Section 1: knowledge and understand
- Page 93 and 94: Extra Comments (please outline any
- Page 95 and 96: In relation to the evaluation of in
- Page 97 and 98: Time-series analysisFor the purpose
- Page 99 and 100: Figure A3.1: Changes in the spatial
- Page 101 and 102: Figure A3.2: Lorenz curves showing
- Page 103 and 104: To recapitulate and elaborate, the
- Page 105 and 106: Concluding comments on methodThe te
- Page 107 and 108: Figure A5.2: An enlargement of the
- Page 109: Figure A5.6: Prospective map magnif