Prospective crime mapping in operational context Final report

Table 2.18: Weekly Knox analysis for area 2 (values in bold are statistically significantaccording to the residual scores (not shown), N=270)WEEKS1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00100 1.90 1.29 0.70 0.75 1.16 0.89 1.00 1.26 0.83 1.00 0.72 1.18200 1.49 1.26 1.15 0.91 0.77 0.66 1.14 1.05 0.95 0.95 0.71 0.88300 1.38 1.11 0.86 0.84 0.85 0.82 1.24 1.15 1.00 1.18 1.19 0.81400 1.22 1.18 1.09 0.88 1.06 1.06 1.04 0.96 0.92 0.80 0.79 1.16500 1.02 0.99 0.88 0.93 1.03 1.05 0.90 1.01 0.93 0.91 0.99 0.93600 1.31 0.96 1.00 1.09 0.89 0.90 0.88 0.92 0.79 0.99 0.79 1.08700 1.12 0.99 0.87 0.74 1.02 1.05 1.06 0.82 0.90 0.98 1.01 0.94800 1.12 1.15 0.81 1.04 1.02 1.02 0.99 1.15 1.01 0.95 0.94 1.09900 1.03 1.17 0.98 1.10 0.98 0.93 0.99 1.12 0.95 0.87 1.06 0.911000 1.11 0.96 1.01 0.88 1.15 1.11 0.99 1.07 0.86 1.10 0.99 0.98For area 3, the results are somewhat different, suggesting that in this area the risk of burglarycommunicates over longer distances and endures a little longer.Table 2.19: Weekly Knox analysis for area 3 (values in bold are statistically significantaccording to the residual scores (not shown), N=357)WEEKS1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00100 2.20 1.26 1.45 1.14 1.03 1.09 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.06 1.26 0.88200 1.61 1.33 1.39 1.07 1.04 0.99 0.83 0.97 0.75 0.97 0.86 0.72300 1.42 1.51 1.04 1.01 1.17 1.00 0.96 1.03 0.75 0.85 1.02 0.81400 1.33 1.13 1.17 1.03 1.07 1.02 1.07 1.04 1.01 0.86 0.94 0.91500 1.04 1.22 1.02 1.11 0.94 0.89 0.79 0.91 0.92 0.88 0.89 0.93600 1.16 1.17 1.09 1.01 0.88 1.02 0.99 0.94 0.96 1.01 0.82 1.09700 1.13 1.06 0.81 1.05 1.04 0.97 1.00 0.90 1.04 1.01 0.87 0.92800 1.14 1.09 0.97 0.92 0.91 1.09 1.01 0.90 1.01 0.72 0.99 0.89900 1.19 1.06 1.13 1.07 0.95 1.10 0.93 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.021000 1.17 0.92 1.08 0.91 1.01 0.88 1.03 1.06 1.00 0.93 0.96 0.96For area 4, there appears to be a more classic effect, with the communication of risk being up toaround 400m and for up to three weeks. Again, the risk to those closest to burgled homes is striking.Table 2.20; Weekly Knox analysis for area 4 (values in bold are statistically significantaccording to the residual scores (not shown), N=407)WEEKS1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00100 2.12 1.61 1.29 1.00 0.81 1.08 1.38 1.00 1.16 0.84 1.17 1.00200 1.36 1.10 1.36 1.13 1.31 1.08 1.03 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.85 0.87300 1.30 1.18 1.03 1.15 1.14 1.10 1.04 1.13 1.05 1.12 1.05 1.08400 1.22 1.04 1.23 1.13 1.12 1.23 1.15 0.85 0.90 1.05 1.21 1.16500 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.10 0.98 1.12 1.16 1.10 0.98 0.92 0.91 0.87600 1.01 1.01 1.17 1.00 1.05 1.02 1.10 1.14 1.04 0.98 0.84 1.05700 1.07 1.15 1.19 1.08 1.17 1.05 0.98 0.97 1.13 1.04 0.91 0.91800 1.16 1.07 1.06 1.05 0.97 1.07 0.96 1.04 1.06 0.97 0.96 0.98900 1.14 1.21 1.05 1.10 1.28 1.10 1.01 0.86 0.91 0.94 1.12 0.991000 1.11 0.95 0.95 1.01 1.14 1.08 1.03 0.93 1.09 0.97 1.03 0.8616