13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2.3.4 Financial analysisAny financial inflows hardly ever exist and financial outflows differ according <strong>to</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> project:Financial outflows• For policy and planning measures:- costs relating <strong>to</strong> institutional and capacity building <strong>of</strong> appropriate national, regional and local institutions- costs relating <strong>to</strong> technical assistance, institutional and capacity building• For physical measures:- <strong>investment</strong> costs- maintenance/operational costs- administrative and technical personnel- expropriationsThe time horizon for project analysis is usually around 50 years.3.2.3.5 Economic analysisEstimating project costs for the prevention or mitigation <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> a natural disaster is generallystraightforward. Estimating the projected benefits <strong>of</strong> prevention <strong>investment</strong>s, however, is more difficult.First, and quite obviously, it is not possible <strong>to</strong> predict when an actual disaster will occur and with whatintensity. Second, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the <strong>investment</strong>s is estimated through vulnerability assessments thatinclude a degree <strong>of</strong> uncertainty. Therefore, in disaster mitigation <strong>projects</strong>, while costs are well defined,benefits derived from likely or avoided losses are not definitive, but are rather probabilistic, at best. Third,in many cases the benefits are public goods (preserving biodiversity, avoiding the loss <strong>of</strong> culturalinheritances, saving lives) and indirect benefits may also represent a very substantial part <strong>of</strong> the overallreturns from a project. The time horizons for natural risk <strong>projects</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten exceed 50 years.As regards the discount rate, this is a case where discounting for the very long term implies that a discountrate that declines over time is appropriate; see, for example, Green Book (UK), HM Treasury (2003).In the case <strong>of</strong> a disaster, the following effects may occur:Direct Effects- physical impacts on capital s<strong>to</strong>ck, such as infrastructure, machinery, and buildings- losses <strong>of</strong> lives and people injuredIndirect Effects - production losses3.2.3.6 Risk assessmentCritical fac<strong>to</strong>rs- Investment costs- Identification <strong>of</strong> possible risks- Lack <strong>of</strong> data- Possible responses <strong>to</strong> natural riskMainvariables<strong>to</strong> consider- Imminent protection measures for vulnerable areas- Natural risk frequency or probability <strong>of</strong> disaster occurrences- information regarding his<strong>to</strong>rical disaster occurrences- Technical and physical information- Identification <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the four ways <strong>of</strong> responding <strong>to</strong> identifiedrisks: acceptance, avoidance, transfer or mitigation104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!