13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

c) Road users producer’s surplus: the road users (cars and trucks) produce the services they supply <strong>to</strong>themselves (car users) or <strong>to</strong> their cus<strong>to</strong>mers (trucks). The difference between the <strong>to</strong>tal costs <strong>of</strong>producing these services and the VOC perceived is defined as unperceived operating costs 59 . Theseenter in<strong>to</strong> the calculation <strong>of</strong> the road users surplus (Table 4.6).d) Government net revenues: thanks <strong>to</strong> the changes in distance travelled due <strong>to</strong> the re-routing <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong>the existing traffic and <strong>to</strong> the generated traffic, the revenues from fuel taxes will increase, and theGovernment will increase its revenues. Part <strong>of</strong> this additional income and increased perceived costspaid by the users cancel each other out, but for the generated traffic this will represent a net benefitfor the project.e) Net environmental benefits: the shift <strong>of</strong> traffic flows from the existing network, (that runs across adensely populated and environmentally sensitive area), <strong>to</strong> the new mo<strong>to</strong>rway, (that crosses a ruralarea), generates a positive environmental externality despite the increase <strong>of</strong> air pollutants emissionsdue <strong>to</strong> a higher transport demand. Only the main pollutants have been taken in<strong>to</strong> account for theevaluation <strong>of</strong> the environmental externalities. Two fac<strong>to</strong>rs have been considered. The <strong>to</strong>tal amount <strong>of</strong>energy consumption and CO 2 emissions (as a function <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> vehicles’ kms, and the shares<strong>of</strong> kms travelled in urban and non-urban areas). For air pollution, the monetary value applied <strong>to</strong> theemission in urban areas is higher than in non-urban areas as it is calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> thepopulation exposed <strong>to</strong> it. Reference monetary values were derived from those explicitlyrecommended for the region by the national planning authority.f) Accident reduction: due <strong>to</strong> the diversion <strong>of</strong> traffic from the old road <strong>to</strong> the new one with a highersafety standard. From the available statistics the accident rates per million vehicles per km for roadand mo<strong>to</strong>rway are respectively 0.32 and 0.09. Therefore a reduction in accidents is foreseen due <strong>to</strong>the diversion <strong>of</strong> traffic from the road network <strong>to</strong> the new mo<strong>to</strong>rway link. The values <strong>of</strong> statisticallives saved applied are those adopted by the national planning authority.The following tables report how some components <strong>of</strong> the project benefits have been calculated for themo<strong>to</strong>rway opening year.Table 4.4 Generalised user costs (€)Generalised user costsBAU Free <strong>of</strong> charge TolledPassengersVOT/trip 6.45 4.83 5.42Perceived operating costs per trip 2.98 3.12 3.61Total generalised costs per trip 9.43 7.95 9.03FreightVOT/trip 8.93 5.83 7.28Perceived operating costs per trip 16.08 16.80 17.52Total per trip 25.01 22.64 24.8059For instance, in the case <strong>of</strong> car users maintenance costs, tyre consumptions and asset’s depreciation are not included in the perceived costs.134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!