Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri
Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri
Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
c) Road users producer’s surplus: the road users (cars and trucks) produce the services they supply <strong>to</strong>themselves (car users) or <strong>to</strong> their cus<strong>to</strong>mers (trucks). The difference between the <strong>to</strong>tal costs <strong>of</strong>producing these services and the VOC perceived is defined as unperceived operating costs 59 . Theseenter in<strong>to</strong> the calculation <strong>of</strong> the road users surplus (Table 4.6).d) Government net revenues: thanks <strong>to</strong> the changes in distance travelled due <strong>to</strong> the re-routing <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong>the existing traffic and <strong>to</strong> the generated traffic, the revenues from fuel taxes will increase, and theGovernment will increase its revenues. Part <strong>of</strong> this additional income and increased perceived costspaid by the users cancel each other out, but for the generated traffic this will represent a net benefitfor the project.e) Net environmental benefits: the shift <strong>of</strong> traffic flows from the existing network, (that runs across adensely populated and environmentally sensitive area), <strong>to</strong> the new mo<strong>to</strong>rway, (that crosses a ruralarea), generates a positive environmental externality despite the increase <strong>of</strong> air pollutants emissionsdue <strong>to</strong> a higher transport demand. Only the main pollutants have been taken in<strong>to</strong> account for theevaluation <strong>of</strong> the environmental externalities. Two fac<strong>to</strong>rs have been considered. The <strong>to</strong>tal amount <strong>of</strong>energy consumption and CO 2 emissions (as a function <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> vehicles’ kms, and the shares<strong>of</strong> kms travelled in urban and non-urban areas). For air pollution, the monetary value applied <strong>to</strong> theemission in urban areas is higher than in non-urban areas as it is calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> thepopulation exposed <strong>to</strong> it. Reference monetary values were derived from those explicitlyrecommended for the region by the national planning authority.f) Accident reduction: due <strong>to</strong> the diversion <strong>of</strong> traffic from the old road <strong>to</strong> the new one with a highersafety standard. From the available statistics the accident rates per million vehicles per km for roadand mo<strong>to</strong>rway are respectively 0.32 and 0.09. Therefore a reduction in accidents is foreseen due <strong>to</strong>the diversion <strong>of</strong> traffic from the road network <strong>to</strong> the new mo<strong>to</strong>rway link. The values <strong>of</strong> statisticallives saved applied are those adopted by the national planning authority.The following tables report how some components <strong>of</strong> the project benefits have been calculated for themo<strong>to</strong>rway opening year.Table 4.4 Generalised user costs (€)Generalised user costsBAU Free <strong>of</strong> charge TolledPassengersVOT/trip 6.45 4.83 5.42Perceived operating costs per trip 2.98 3.12 3.61Total generalised costs per trip 9.43 7.95 9.03FreightVOT/trip 8.93 5.83 7.28Perceived operating costs per trip 16.08 16.80 17.52Total per trip 25.01 22.64 24.8059For instance, in the case <strong>of</strong> car users maintenance costs, tyre consumptions and asset’s depreciation are not included in the perceived costs.134