Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri
Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri
Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.1 Case Study: <strong>investment</strong> in a mo<strong>to</strong>rway4.1.1 IntroductionRecent developments in a Convergence region has been accompanied by fast growth in the volume <strong>of</strong>traffic along the corridor between two medium size urban areas. The existing local road network wasdesigned <strong>to</strong> accommodate lower volumes <strong>of</strong> traffic and it is now reaching its full capacity. Congestionproblems are expected <strong>to</strong> increase in the future due <strong>to</strong> the foreseen growth in both passengers and freighttransport demand. Furthermore, the existing network runs across the most densely populated areas <strong>of</strong> theregion thus causing serious environmental and safety problems for the people living in the area. For thesereasons, the planning authority has proposed <strong>to</strong> assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> a new mo<strong>to</strong>rway link by-passingthe more densely urbanised areas. The main objectives <strong>of</strong> the project are therefore <strong>to</strong> reduce futurecongestion and <strong>to</strong> limit the population exposure <strong>to</strong> transport emissions. In addition, the project shouldalso contribute <strong>to</strong> a reduction in accidents by diverting traffic, particularly by diverting the freight from theexisting network <strong>to</strong> the new infrastructure. As well as the traffic diversion from the existing roads, the newmo<strong>to</strong>rway is expected <strong>to</strong> induce some newly generated traffic, but as the area is already densely populated,and congestion is highly localised, the additional traffic will be limited.The benefits <strong>of</strong> the new 72 km mo<strong>to</strong>rway are <strong>to</strong> be found mainly in time savings, abatement <strong>of</strong> emissionsexposure and a reduction in accidents. The reduction in kms travelled and consequently the ‘vehicleoperating costs’ (VOC) savings made by the flow <strong>of</strong> traffic running through the whole mo<strong>to</strong>rway areoutweighed by the additional kms travelled in order <strong>to</strong> access and egress the mo<strong>to</strong>rway by the traffic usingonly some stretches <strong>of</strong> the new infrastructure. The new mo<strong>to</strong>rway link will generate some additionaltraffic which in turn, will produce additional external costs, which would not have been produced withoutthe new link.The options considered were a free mo<strong>to</strong>rway or a <strong>to</strong>lled mo<strong>to</strong>rway.4.1.2 Traffic forecastTraffic forecast is based on the expected growth <strong>of</strong> GDP and population in the area and builds on thepast trends re-adjusted by the most recent national forecast. The study area covers all the area directlyaffected by the project. The network considered is the entire road network <strong>of</strong> the area. Consequently, theflows considered are the ones using this network.Different growth rates were applied for passengers and freight flows. Passenger demand has beendisaggregated according <strong>to</strong> the trip purpose, in order <strong>to</strong> apply the appropriate ‘values <strong>of</strong> time’ (VOT).Future demand with and without the project has been estimated with the support <strong>of</strong> a road traffic model 55 .To assess the benefits <strong>of</strong> the new connection, <strong>to</strong>tal traffic on the new mo<strong>to</strong>rway has been sub-divided in<strong>to</strong>three different components:- the first is the diverted traffic, consisting <strong>of</strong> the freight and passengers who will be switching from theold route <strong>to</strong> the new mo<strong>to</strong>rway. This traffic will benefit from the reduced travel time due <strong>to</strong> the higherspeeds and the absence <strong>of</strong> congestion and, at least partly, due <strong>to</strong> reduced distance;- the second component is the traffic ‘generated’ by the new link: this traffic, consisting <strong>of</strong> new roadusers, is induced by the increased accessibility <strong>to</strong> the area. The benefits <strong>of</strong> the newly generated traffic isrepresented by the changes in consumer’s surplus, defined as the excess <strong>of</strong> consumer’s willingness-<strong>to</strong>payover the actual generalised costs <strong>of</strong> travel (travel time, vehicle operating costs and, for the option<strong>of</strong> the <strong>to</strong>lled mo<strong>to</strong>rway, <strong>to</strong>ll fees). The generated traffic will also be responsible for additional externalcosts in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental emissions, noise and global warming;55The details <strong>of</strong> the traffic model forecasts are not reported in this illustrative case study.130