13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This analysis shows the need <strong>to</strong> pay great attention <strong>to</strong> the forecasts <strong>of</strong> <strong>investment</strong> costs and sales. Anover-optimistic provision for sales can turn an unpr<strong>of</strong>itable <strong>investment</strong> project in<strong>to</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>itable one: so, itis important <strong>to</strong> analyse the market dynamics and the company’s capacity <strong>to</strong> compete successfully.In order <strong>to</strong> properly assess the project risk, the risk analysis was based on an appropriate probabilitydistribution for the critical variables. In the sensitivity analysis the most critical variables identified were‘Sales <strong>of</strong> product C’ and ‘New equipment costs’.Table 4.60 Assumed probability distributions <strong>of</strong> the project variables, Monte Carlo methodVariable Applied <strong>to</strong> Range Kind <strong>of</strong> distribution NotesSales <strong>of</strong> product C Financial and economic 1,400–2,600 units Gaussian MV 104 = 2,000; SD = 180New equipment costs Financial and economic 38,000–46,000 Euro TriangularFigure 4.15 Probability distribution <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong> product C in Units – Normal distribution0,0025Probability density0,0020,00150,0010,000500,00 500,00 1000,00 1500,00 2000,00 2500,00 3000,00Values <strong>of</strong> the variableFigure 4.16 Probability distribution <strong>of</strong> new equipment costs in Euro – Triangular distribution0.000Probability density0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.00035,000.00 37,000.00 39,000.00 41,000.00 43,000.00 45,000.00 47,000.00Values <strong>of</strong> the variableThe results <strong>of</strong> the risk analysis (see Figure 4.17 below) show that the project is highly risky (more than40% probability <strong>of</strong> a negative ENPV). Given the modest financial return on <strong>investment</strong> and the high riskfor the economic return 105 , the project should be reconsidered and risk mitigation measures adopted.104105MV = Mean value; SD = Standard deviation.The risk is also relatively high for the private inves<strong>to</strong>r (the analysis is not reported here).192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!