13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

adjustments for Competitive Neutrality, Retained Risk and Transferable Risk <strong>to</strong> achieve the required service deliveryoutcomes, and is used as a benchmark for assessing the potential value for money <strong>of</strong> private party bids.The PSC should:- be expressed as the Net Present Cost <strong>of</strong> a projected cash-flow based on the specified government discount rateover the required life <strong>of</strong> the contract;- be based on the most recent or efficient form <strong>of</strong> public sec<strong>to</strong>r delivery for similar infrastructure or relatedservices;- include Competitive Neutrality adjustments so that there is no net financial advantage between public and privatesec<strong>to</strong>r ownership;- contain realistic assessments <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> all material and quantifiable risks that would reasonably be expected<strong>to</strong> be transferred <strong>to</strong> the bidders;- include an assessment <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the material risks that are reasonably expected <strong>to</strong> be retained by thegovernment.The assessment requires a number <strong>of</strong> steps:Raw PSC. First <strong>of</strong> all a raw PSC has <strong>to</strong> be estimated, which provides a base costing under the public procurementmethod where the underlying asset or service is owned by the public sec<strong>to</strong>r. This includes all capital and operatingcosts, both direct and indirect, associated with building, owning, maintaining and delivering the service (orunderlying asset) over the same period as the term under the Public Private Partnership, and <strong>to</strong> a definedperformance standard as required under the output specification. One <strong>of</strong> the keys <strong>to</strong> constructing a PSC is theidentification <strong>of</strong> the Reference Project. The Reference Project is the most likely and efficient form <strong>of</strong> public sec<strong>to</strong>rdelivery that could be employed <strong>to</strong> satisfy all elements <strong>of</strong> the output specification.Figure G.1 Public Sec<strong>to</strong>r Compara<strong>to</strong>rCompetitive Neutrality adjustments remove any net advantages (or disadvantages) that accrue <strong>to</strong> a governmentbusiness simply by virtue <strong>of</strong> being owned by the government. This allows a fair and equitable assessment between aPSC and the bidders.Transferable risk Estimate <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> those risks (from the government’s perspective) that are likely <strong>to</strong> beallocated <strong>to</strong> the private party.Retained risk Estimate <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> those risks or parts <strong>of</strong> a risk that the government proposes <strong>to</strong> bear itself.Risk adjustment bids may propose different levels <strong>of</strong> risk transfer. Before the PSC can be compared against theaccepted variant bids, the level <strong>of</strong> risk transfer proposed in each bid should be analysed <strong>to</strong> reflect the level <strong>of</strong> risktransfer proposed by the government.This is achieved by adjusting the relevant bids through the following method:- where a bid <strong>of</strong>fers a greater level <strong>of</strong> risk transfer <strong>to</strong> the private sec<strong>to</strong>r than proposed by the government, theadjustment <strong>to</strong> the bid cost will be negative (reduce the <strong>to</strong>tal bid cost); or232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!