13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2.1 What is a project?A project can be defined as an operation comprising a series <strong>of</strong> works, activities or services intended <strong>to</strong>accomplish an indivisible task <strong>of</strong> a precise economic or technical nature; one which has well defined goals.The appraisal needs <strong>to</strong> focus on the whole project as a self-sufficient unit <strong>of</strong> analysis and not on fragmentsor sections <strong>of</strong> it. Partitions <strong>of</strong> <strong>projects</strong> for purely administrative reasons are not appropriate objects <strong>of</strong>appraisal.This may, in some cases, entail requesting the promoter <strong>to</strong> consider a set <strong>of</strong> sub-<strong>projects</strong> as in fact onelarge project. This might be the case with a request for EU financial support for some initial phases <strong>of</strong> an<strong>investment</strong>, whose success hinges on the completion <strong>of</strong> the project as a whole. Thus, the whole <strong>projects</strong>hould be considered. CBA requires going beyond the purely administrative definitions. For instance, <strong>to</strong>assess the quality <strong>of</strong> a given project, the promoter must produce an adequate appraisal, not only for thepart <strong>of</strong> the project <strong>to</strong> be financed with the assistance <strong>of</strong> EU Funds, but for the parts that are closelyconnected <strong>to</strong> it as well and possibly financed in other ways. In other words, a consolidated CBA may benecessary in order <strong>to</strong> understand the net benefits <strong>of</strong> one section <strong>of</strong> a project.Sometimes a project application consists <strong>of</strong> several inter-related but relatively self-standing components.For example, for a project comprising hydroelectric power, irrigation water and recreational facilities, ifbenefits and costs <strong>of</strong> each component are independent, then the components are separable and can betreated as independent <strong>projects</strong>. Appraising such a project involves, firstly, the consideration <strong>of</strong> eachcomponent independently and, secondly, the assessment <strong>of</strong> possible combinations <strong>of</strong> components.When there are different feasible options for a section <strong>of</strong> a project, simplified CBA for each option mayhelp <strong>to</strong> test their impact on the whole project (see par. 2.3.3). As an example, a project may consist <strong>of</strong> thecompletion <strong>of</strong> a trans-national electricity link under the TEN–E. Here, the economic appraisal shouldfocus not on the entire link, but only on the project’s section where different options are available.The promoter should justify the project identification choice and the examiner has the task <strong>of</strong> judging thequality <strong>of</strong> this choice. In the event that the object <strong>of</strong> analysis is not clearly identified, the examiner mayrequest that the promoter integrates the presentation dossier with a clarification <strong>of</strong> its identification(‘where is the other half <strong>of</strong> the bridge?’).EXAMPLE: IDENTIFICATION OF A PROJECTA highway project connecting <strong>to</strong>wn A with <strong>to</strong>wn B, which is justified only by the expectation that an airport will be located inthe vicinity <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>wn B and that most <strong>of</strong> the traffic will take place between the airport and <strong>to</strong>wn A: the project should be analysedin the context <strong>of</strong> the airport-highway system as a whole.A hydroelectric power station, located in X and supposed <strong>to</strong> serve a new energy-intensive plant in Y: again, if the two works aremutually dependent for the assessment <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits, the analysis should be integrated, even if the EU assistance isrequested only for the energy supply part <strong>of</strong> the project.A large-scale productive forestation project, financed with public funds and justified by the opportunity <strong>of</strong> supplying a privatelyowned cellulose company: the analysis should consider costs and benefits <strong>of</strong> both components, which is <strong>to</strong> say the forestationproject and the industrial plant.2.2.2 Indirect and network effectsAfter having identified the project, the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the analysis should be defined. The project has adirect impact on users, workers, inves<strong>to</strong>rs, suppliers, etc. but also indirect impacts on third parties. Therisk <strong>of</strong> double counting project benefits should be carefully considered.In general, indirect impacts in secondary markets should not be included in the economic appraisal,whenever an appropriate shadow price (see Glossary and section 2.5) has been given for the benefits andcosts. For instance, the impact <strong>of</strong> a highway on the local <strong>to</strong>urism sec<strong>to</strong>r, e.g. through the additionalemployment or additional added value should not be included in the CBA when an appropriate shadowwage has been used, as will be discussed further (see par. 2.5.3). As a general rule, market effects (quantityor price changes) in undis<strong>to</strong>rted secondary markets should be ignored, assuming that the appraisal has28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!