13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER FOURCASE STUDIESOverviewThis chapter presents five case studies providing worked examples <strong>of</strong> the methodology presented in theprevious chapters. The case studies include:- <strong>investment</strong> in a mo<strong>to</strong>rway- <strong>investment</strong> in a railway line- <strong>investment</strong> in an incinera<strong>to</strong>r with energy recovery- <strong>investment</strong> in a waste water treatment plant- industrial <strong>investment</strong>Each case study is organized in such a way <strong>to</strong> allow, as far as possible, a ‘horizontal’ reading structuredalongside the six steps required for a consistent project appraisal. Nevertheless, they are at the same time‘personalized’ in order <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account sec<strong>to</strong>ral specifics and <strong>to</strong> show the operational application <strong>of</strong>some <strong>of</strong> the guidelines proposed in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3.As already mentioned, the economic evaluation <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>projects</strong> is traditionally based on a partialequilibrium approach. For this reason, in the first two case studies, the economic analysis is presentedbefore the financial analysis and the economic benefits are obtained by adding the consumer with theproducer’s surpluses and not by applying conversion fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> the project revenues.The other three case studies are based on a general equilibrium approach, which implies the use <strong>of</strong> shadowprices. Each has, however, developed in more depth a certain <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>to</strong> provide the reader with a practicalapplication <strong>of</strong> the concepts illustrated in Chapter 2. For example:- both the environmental case studies use an adjustment for the change <strong>of</strong> real prices (i.e. relative <strong>to</strong>general inflation);- the incinera<strong>to</strong>r case study presents a valuation <strong>of</strong> a negative externality by means <strong>of</strong> an hedonic price(see also Annex F);- the waste water treatment plant <strong>investment</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers an example <strong>of</strong> PPP and how <strong>to</strong> calculate the returnon own capital <strong>to</strong> private inves<strong>to</strong>rs (K p );- the industrial <strong>investment</strong> shows how risk analysis can question the project design, because, despite thebaseline case seems <strong>to</strong> be acceptable, there is a high probability <strong>of</strong> a negative economic return.The case studies are illustrative examples <strong>of</strong> the methodology <strong>of</strong> project analysis presented in the previousChapters. They are not <strong>to</strong> be seen as synopsis <strong>of</strong> complete reports. All figures are purely indicative andshould not be taken as benchmark values 54 .54Particularly transport <strong>projects</strong> are <strong>of</strong>ten based on highly variable assumptions, for example because <strong>of</strong> different traffic models, the network orcorridor considered, etc. The case studies cannot represent a ‘typical’ project, because each actual project will be based on specific ingredients.129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!