16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30PRIVATE EQUITY 0 0 0 36,192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL NATIONAL PUBLICCONTRIBUTION0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EU GRANT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LOANS 0 0 0 36,192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL FINANCIAL RESOURCES 0 0 0 72,384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Municipal waste 4,105 4,166 4,228 4,291 4,355 4,420 4,486 4,553 4,621 4,690 4,759 4,830 4,902 4,975 5,049Other waste 308 313 317 322 327 332 336 342 347 352 357 362 368 373 379Electricity 10,126 10,390 10,662 10,940 11,226 11,519 11,820 12,129 12,446 12,771 13,104 13,447 13,798 14,158 14,528Heat 5,879 6,038 6,202 6,371 6,544 6,721 6,904 7,091 7,283 7,481 7,684 7,893 8,107 8,327 8,553SALES 20,418 20,907 21,409 21,924 22,451 22,992 23,546 24,114 24,696 25,293 25,905 26,532 27,175 27,833 28,509TOTAL INFLOWS 20,418 20,907 21,409 94,308 22,451 22,992 23,546 24,114 24,696 25,293 25,905 26,532 27,175 27,833 28,509Labour cost 2,496 2,559 2,622 2,687 2,754 2,823 2,893 2,965 3,039 3,115 3,192 3,272 3,354 3,436 3,523Gas 303 312 322 332 342 353 364 375 387 399 411 424 438 451 465Eectrical energy 680 700 720 741 763 785 808 831 856 881 906 933 960 988 1,017Water services 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 13Raw material 357 364 371 379 386 394 402 410 418 427 435 444 453 462 471Intermediate services and goods 1,783 1,819 1,855 1,892 1,930 1,969 2,008 2,048 2,089 2,131 2,174 2,217 2,262 2,307 2,353Elimination <strong>of</strong> ash and slag waste 3,702 3,777 3,852 3,929 4,008 4,088 4,170 4,253 4,338 4,425 4,513 4,604 4,696 4,790 4,885TOTAL OPERATING <strong>COST</strong>S 9,330 9,539 9,752 9,970 10,193 10,421 10,655 10,894 11,138 11,388 11,644 11,905 12,173 12,446 12,727Feasibility study, tender costs etc. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Land expropriation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Equipments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Investments costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Replacement costs 0 0 0 72,383 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Remediation and decontamination costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,967Residual valueOther <strong>investment</strong> items 0 0 0 72,383 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,967TOTAL INVESTMENT <strong>COST</strong>S 0 0 0 72,383 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,967Bonds and other financial resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EIB loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other loans 0 0 0 0 1,810 1,629 1,448 1,267 1,086 905 724 543 362 181INTEREST 0 0 0 0 1,810 1,629 1,448 1,267 1,086 905 724 543 362 181 0Bonds and other financial resources 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EIB loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other loans 0 0 0 0 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 0LOANS REIMBOURSEMENT 0 0 0 0 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 3,619 0PROFIT TAXATION 2,042 2,091 2,141 2,192 2,245 2,299 2,355 2,411 2,470 2,529 2,590 2,653 2,717 2,783 0TOTAL OUTFLOWS 11,372 11,629 11,893 84,545 17,867 17,968 18,076 18,191 18,313 18,441 18,577 18,720 18,871 19,029 45,694NET CASH FLOW 9,046 9,278 9,517 9,762 4,584 5,023 5,470 5,923 6,383 6,852 7,328 7,811 8,303 8,804 -17,185CUMULATED TOTAL CASH FLOW 50,914 60,192 69,709 79,471 84,055 89,079 94,548 100,471 106,854 113,706 121,034 128,845 137,148 145,952 128,767166
Table 4.38 Economic analysis (thousands <strong>of</strong> Euros)CF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15Municipal waste 0.96 0 0 0 1,643 3,335 3,385 3,435 3,486 3,538 3,591 3,644 3,699 3,754 3,810 3,866Other waste 0.96 0 0 0 123 250 254 258 262 265 269 273 277 282 286 290Electricity 0.96 0 0 0 3,552 7,289 7,479 7,675 7,875 8,081 8,292 8,508 8,731 8,959 9,193 9,433Heat 0.96 0 0 0 2,038 4,186 4,299 4,416 4,536 4,659 4,785 4,915 5,049 5,186 5,327 5,471SALES 0 0 0 7,355 15,059 15,417 15,783 16,159 16,543 16,937 17,341 17,755 18,179 18,614 19,060CO2 avoided (electricity) - 0 0 0 5,829 11,891 12,129 12,371 12,619 12,871 13,129 13,391 13,659 13,932 14,211 14,495CO2 avoided (heat) - 0 0 0 5 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 14POSITVE EXTERNALITIES 0 0 0 5,834 11,902 12,140 12,383 12,631 12,883 13,141 13,404 13,672 13,945 14,224 14,509ECONOMIC <strong>BENEFIT</strong>S 0 0 0 13,190 26,961 27,557 28,166 28,789 29,426 30,078 30,745 31,427 32,124 32,838 33,569Skilled labour cost 1.00 0 0 0 481 494 507 521 535 550 565 580 596 612 629 646Non skilled labour cost 0.60 0 0 0 827 847 867 888 909 931 954 977 1,000 1,024 1,049 1,074Gas 0.96 0 0 0 100 206 213 219 226 233 241 248 256 264 272 280Eectrical energy 0.96 0 0 0 230 474 487 502 516 531 547 563 579 596 613 631Water services 0.96 0 0 0 3 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8Raw material 0.96 0 0 0 135 274 280 286 291 297 303 309 315 322 328 335Intermediate services and goods 0.72 0 0 0 505 1,029 1,050 1,071 1,092 1,114 1,136 1,159 1,182 1,206 1,230 1,255Elimination <strong>of</strong> ash and slag waste 0.67 0 0 0 983 2,005 2,045 2,086 2,128 2,170 2,214 2,258 2,303 2,349 2,396 2,444TOTAL OPERATING <strong>COST</strong>S 0 0 0 3,263 5,335 5,456 5,579 5,705 5,834 5,966 6,101 6,239 6,380 6,525 6,673Feasibility study, tender costs etc. 1.00 6,980 0 1,816 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Land expropriation 1.33 1,980 1,010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Buildings 0.70 0 40,140 12,461 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Equipments 0.60 0 24,813 37,964 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Investments costs 8,960 65,962 52,240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Replacement costs 0.67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Remediation and decontamination costs 0.68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Residual value 0.71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Other <strong>investment</strong> items 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL INVESTMENT <strong>COST</strong>S 8,960 65,962 52,240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Noise, odours, etc. - 0 0 0 184 375 383 391 398 406 415 423 431 440 449 458NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES 0 0 0 184 375 383 391 398 406 415 423 431 440 449 458TOTAL ECONOMIC <strong>COST</strong>S 8,960 65,962 52,240 3,447 5,711 5,839 5,970 6,104 6,240 6,380 6,524 6,670 6,820 6,974 7,130NET ECONOMIC <strong>BENEFIT</strong> -8,960 -65,962 -52,240 9,743 21,251 21,718 22,196 22,686 23,186 23,698 24,221 24,757 25,304 25,865 26,438CF 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30Municipal waste 0.96 3,924 3,982 4,042 4,102 4,163 4,225 4,288 4,352 4,417 4,483 4,549 4,617 4,686 4,756 4,827Other waste 0.96 294 299 303 308 312 317 322 326 331 336 341 346 351 357 362Electricity 0.96 9,679 9,932 10,191 10,458 10,731 11,011 11,299 11,594 11,897 12,207 12,526 12,853 13,189 13,534 13,887Heat 0.96 5,620 5,772 5,929 6,090 6,255 6,425 6,599 6,778 6,962 7,151 7,345 7,544 7,749 7,960 8,176SALES 19,517 19,985 20,465 20,957 21,461 21,978 22,507 23,050 23,607 24,177 24,762 25,361 25,976 26,606 27,251CO2 avoided (electricity) - 14,785 15,081 15,382 15,690 16,004 16,324 16,650 16,983 17,323 17,669 18,023 18,383 18,751 19,126 19,508CO2 avoided (heat) - 14 14 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 18POSITVE EXTERNALITIES 14,799 15,095 15,397 15,705 16,019 16,339 16,666 16,999 17,339 17,686 18,039 18,400 18,768 19,144 19,527ECONOMIC <strong>BENEFIT</strong>S 34,315 35,080 35,861 36,661 37,479 38,316 39,173 40,049 40,946 41,863 42,801 43,761 44,744 45,749 46,778Skilled labour cost 1.00 663 681 700 719 738 758 779 800 822 844 867 890 914 939 965Non skilled labour cost 0.60 1,100 1,126 1,154 1,181 1,210 1,239 1,269 1,299 1,331 1,363 1,395 1,429 1,464 1,499 1,535Gas 0.96 289 298 308 317 327 337 348 359 370 381 393 406 418 431 445Eectrical energy 0.96 650 669 688 708 729 750 772 795 818 842 866 892 918 944 972Water services 0.96 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 12Raw material 0.96 341 348 355 362 369 377 384 392 400 408 416 424 433 441 450Intermediate services and goods 0.72 1,280 1,305 1,331 1,358 1,385 1,413 1,441 1,470 1,499 1,529 1,560 1,591 1,623 1,655 1,689Elimination <strong>of</strong> ash and slag waste 0.67 2,493 2,543 2,594 2,646 2,699 2,753 2,808 2,864 2,921 2,980 3,039 3,100 3,162 3,225 3,290TOTAL OPERATING <strong>COST</strong>S 6,824 6,979 7,138 7,300 7,466 7,636 7,810 7,988 8,170 8,357 8,547 8,743 8,943 9,147 9,357Feasibility study, tender costs etc. 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Land expropriation 1.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Buildings 0.70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Equipments 0.60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Investments costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Replacement costs 0.67 0 0 0 48,497 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Remediation and decontamination costs 0.68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,295Residual value 0.71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -6,393Other <strong>investment</strong> items 0 0 0 48,497 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,903TOTAL INVESTMENT <strong>COST</strong>S 0 0 0 48,497 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,903Local impact - 467 476 486 495 505 515 526 536 547 558 569 580 592 604 616NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES 467 476 486 495 505 515 526 536 547 558 569 580 592 604 616TOTAL ECONOMIC <strong>COST</strong>S 7,291 7,455 7,624 56,292 7,971 8,152 8,336 8,524 8,717 8,915 9,116 9,323 9,535 9,751 25,875NET ECONOMIC <strong>BENEFIT</strong> 27,024 27,624 28,238 -19,631 29,508 30,165 30,837 31,525 32,229 32,948 33,685 34,438 35,209 35,998 20,902Discount Rate 3.5%ENPV 259,891.1ERR 15.1%B/C 2.0167
- Page 3:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONSBAUB/CCBA
- Page 7 and 8:
TABLESTable 2.1 Financial analysis
- Page 9:
FIGURESFigure 1.1 Project cost spre
- Page 12 and 13:
Cohesion Fund, and through the leve
- Page 14 and 15:
or the plant will not reveal excess
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER ONEPROJECT APPRAISAL IN THE
- Page 19 and 20:
Some specifications for financial t
- Page 21 and 22:
FOCUS: INFORMATION REQUIREDGeneral
- Page 23 and 24:
In particular, CBA results should p
- Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER TWOAN AGENDA FOR THE PROJEC
- Page 27 and 28:
objectives, are, as far as possible
- Page 29 and 30:
considered the appropriate shadow p
- Page 31 and 32:
2.3.2 Feasibility analysisFeasibili
- Page 34 and 35:
This approach will be presented in
- Page 36 and 37:
Current assets include:- receivable
- Page 38 and 39:
The following items are usually not
- Page 40 and 41:
Mainly, the examiner uses the FRR(C
- Page 42 and 43:
The dynamics of the incoming flows
- Page 44 and 45:
eturn on their own capital (Kp). Th
- Page 46 and 47:
While the approach presented in thi
- Page 48 and 49:
2.5.1 Conversion of market to accou
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.9 Electricity price dispers
- Page 52 and 53:
2.5.1.2 Fiscal correctionsSome item
- Page 54 and 55:
previously estimated in projects wi
- Page 56 and 57:
FOCUS: ENPV VS. FNPVThe difference
- Page 58 and 59:
2.6 Risk assessmentProject appraisa
- Page 60 and 61:
Table 2.14 Impact analysis of criti
- Page 62 and 63:
Figure 2.6 Probability distribution
- Page 64 and 65:
eneficiary. The project proposer sh
- Page 66 and 67:
There are many ways to design an MC
- Page 68 and 69:
PROJECT APPRAISAL CHECK-LISTCONTEXT
- Page 70 and 71:
- reduction of congestion by elimin
- Page 72 and 73:
- the methods applied to estimate e
- Page 74 and 75:
- the marginal external costs: cong
- Page 76 and 77:
- the benefits for the existing tra
- Page 78 and 79:
The following tables show some refe
- Page 80 and 81:
3.1.1.6 Risk assessmentDue to their
- Page 82 and 83:
As shown in Figure 3.1, only under
- Page 84 and 85:
3.1.3.7 Other project evaluation ap
- Page 87 and 88:
- Waste Management Hierarchy rules
- Page 89 and 90:
The time horizon for a project anal
- Page 91 and 92:
3.2.1.7 Other project evaluation ap
- Page 93 and 94:
every user support the total costs
- Page 95 and 96:
Territorial reference frameworkIf t
- Page 97 and 98:
Cycle and phases of the projectGrea
- Page 99 and 100:
One of the most important aims of t
- Page 101 and 102:
projects, as in other sectors in wh
- Page 103 and 104:
3.2.3.2 Project identificationBasic
- Page 105 and 106:
3.2.3.7 Other project evaluation ap
- Page 107 and 108:
In order to evaluate the overall im
- Page 109 and 110:
for regassification plants, number
- Page 111 and 112:
Examples of objectives are:- change
- Page 113 and 114:
decontamination if any;- the techni
- Page 115 and 116: 3.3.3.6 Risk AnalysisCritical facto
- Page 117 and 118: 3.3.4.6 Risk assessmentCritical fac
- Page 119 and 120: 3.4.1.5 Economic analysisThe follow
- Page 121 and 122: Financial inflows• Admission fees
- Page 123 and 124: expectancy suitably adjusted by the
- Page 125 and 126: The time horizon for project analys
- Page 127 and 128: A Cost-Benefit Analysis should cons
- Page 129 and 130: CHAPTER FOURCASE STUDIESOverviewThi
- Page 131 and 132: - finally, there is the traffic tha
- Page 134 and 135: c) Road users producer’s surplus:
- Page 136 and 137: 4.1.5 Scenario analysisTwo scenario
- Page 138 and 139: The financial performance indicator
- Page 140 and 141: Table 4.10 Economic analysis (Milli
- Page 142 and 143: Table 4.12 Financial return on capi
- Page 144 and 145: 4.2 Case Study: investment in a rai
- Page 146 and 147: 4.2.4 Economic analysisThe benefits
- Page 148 and 149: Financial investment costs have bee
- Page 150 and 151: Figure 4.6 Results of the risk anal
- Page 152 and 153: Table 4.22 Economic analysis (Milli
- Page 154 and 155: Table 4.24 Financial return on capi
- Page 156 and 157: 4.3 Case Study: investment in an in
- Page 158 and 159: ate of 0.6% per year is assumed for
- Page 160 and 161: The shadow price of the CO 2 avoide
- Page 162 and 163: As a result, the probability distri
- Page 164 and 165: Table 4.36 Financial return on capi
- Page 168 and 169: 4.4 Case Study: investment in a was
- Page 170 and 171: 4.4.2 Financial analysisAlthough in
- Page 172 and 173: THE CALCULATION OF REVENUESReferrin
- Page 174 and 175: 0.15 m 3 /m 2 a depreciation of 20%
- Page 176 and 177: As result, the probability distribu
- Page 178 and 179: Figure 4.13 Probability distributio
- Page 180 and 181: Table 4.48 Financial return on nati
- Page 182 and 183: Table 4.50 Financial return on priv
- Page 184 and 185: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
- Page 186 and 187: 4.5 Case Study: industrial investme
- Page 188 and 189: 4.5.4.1 Investment costsThe total i
- Page 190 and 191: Finally, a residual value was estim
- Page 192 and 193: This analysis shows the need to pay
- Page 194 and 195: Table 4.62 Financial return on inve
- Page 196 and 197: Table 4.64 Return on private equity
- Page 198 and 199: Table 4.66 Economic analysis (thous
- Page 200 and 201: ANNEX ADEMAND ANALYSISDemand foreca
- Page 202 and 203: The method applied for the forecast
- Page 204 and 205: Furthermore, travel demand depends
- Page 206 and 207: This Guide supports a unique refere
- Page 208 and 209: A higher discount rate for countrie
- Page 210 and 211: Figure C.1 Project ranking by NPV v
- Page 212 and 213: The main problems with this indicat
- Page 214 and 215: EXAMPLE OF SHADOW WAGE IN DUAL MARK
- Page 216 and 217:
Another exhaustive way to include d
- Page 218 and 219:
Figure E.2 Percentage of low income
- Page 220 and 221:
ANNEX FEVALUATION OF HEALTH &ENVIRO
- Page 222 and 223:
Figure F.1 Main evaluation methodsS
- Page 224 and 225:
- expenditure on capital equipment
- Page 226 and 227:
due to air pollution or water conta
- Page 228 and 229:
BENEFIT TRANSFER - SELECTED REFEREN
- Page 230 and 231:
ANNEX GEVALUATION OF PPP PROJECTSIt
- Page 232 and 233:
adjustments for Competitive Neutral
- Page 234 and 235:
ANNEX HRISK ASSESSMENTIn ex-ante pr
- Page 236 and 237:
Reference ForecastingThe question o
- Page 238 and 239:
Figure H.5 Levels of risks in diffe
- Page 240 and 241:
ANNEX IDETERMINATION OF THE EU GRAN
- Page 242 and 243:
A.4. Technological Alternatives and
- Page 244 and 245:
GLOSSARYAccounting period: the inte
- Page 246 and 247:
Market price: the price at which a
- Page 248 and 249:
BIBLIOGRAPHY1. ReferencesBelli, P.,
- Page 250 and 251:
Ray, A. 1984, Cost-benefit analysis
- Page 252 and 253:
EnvironmentGeneralAtkinson, G., 200
- Page 254 and 255:
European Commission, DG Tren, 2003,