13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5.6.1 SalesIt is possible <strong>to</strong> consider a worse dynamic for the sales <strong>of</strong> product C (the one not designed for a specificcus<strong>to</strong>mer). In this case, with a reduction <strong>of</strong> 5% in annual growth and <strong>of</strong> 5% in initial output, theperformance <strong>of</strong> the project would decrease in a remarkable way. In this case, assumptions showed in thetable were made.Table 4.56 Sales <strong>of</strong> product C - Assumption1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Baseline AssumptionInitial output= 2,000 +% <strong>of</strong> the output 60 80 200 30 2 2 2 2Sensitivity testInitial output =1,900 +% <strong>of</strong> the output 57 76 190 28.5 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.94.5.6.2 Investment costsThe other possibility is <strong>to</strong> consider a worse situation for the dynamics <strong>of</strong> some <strong>investment</strong> cost items, asshown in the following tables.An investigation in<strong>to</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the single components <strong>of</strong> <strong>investment</strong> costs was conducted and hasunderlined the importance <strong>of</strong> building and new equipment costs.Also in this case the results <strong>of</strong> financial and economic analyses for the two items are presented for a 5%variation in the yearly absolute value.Table 4.57 Building costs – Assumption – Thousands <strong>of</strong> Euros1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Baseline Assumption 6,000 6,000 5,000Sensitivity test (+5%) 6,300 6,300 5,250Table 4.58 New equipment costs – Assumption – Thousands <strong>of</strong> Euros1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Baseline Assumption 10,000 14,000 18,000Sensitivity test (+5%) 10,500 14,700 18,900As requested by Point E.1. <strong>of</strong> the Application Form, the impact <strong>of</strong> parameter variation in terms <strong>of</strong>modification <strong>of</strong> the main performance indica<strong>to</strong>rs is summarised in the table below.Table 4.59 Results <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity testSensitivity TestPerformance Indica<strong>to</strong>rs Baseline CaseOperating CostsSales <strong>of</strong> product C (-5%)Buildings (+5%) New Equipment (+5%)FNPV(C) – M Euro -5.47 - 9.77 -6.24 -7.35FRR(C) 3.3% 1.9% 3.0% 2.8%FNPV(K) – M Euro 10.45 6.l5 10.45* 10.45*FRR(K) 9.3% 7.6% 9.3%* 9.3%*ENPV- M Euro 3.53 -1.16 2.82 1.52ERR 6.7% 5.1% 6.4% 6.0%* Buildings and new equipment costs do not affect the FNPV(K) and FRR(K)With regard <strong>to</strong> the <strong>investment</strong> costs, the analysis points out that the most critical item is new equipmentcosts. A similar variation in land cost only has a slight effect on both financial and economic pr<strong>of</strong>itability.191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!