The method applied for the forecasting must be clearly explained and details on how the forecasts were preparedmay help in understanding the consistency and realism <strong>of</strong> forecasts.Interviewing expertsWhenever, for budget or time reasons, a quantitative methodology for demand forecasting cannot be applied,interviewing experts can provide independent external estimations <strong>of</strong> the expected impact <strong>of</strong> a project. Theadvantages <strong>of</strong> this approach are low cost and speed. Of course, this kind <strong>of</strong> estimation can be only qualitative or, ifquantitative, very approximate. Indeed, this approach can be recommended only for a very preliminary stage <strong>of</strong> theforecasting procedure.Trend extrapolationExtrapolation <strong>of</strong> past trends involves fitting a trend <strong>to</strong> data points from the past, usually with regression analysis.Various mathematical relationships are available that link time <strong>to</strong> the variable being forecasted (e.g. expecteddemand). The simplest assumption is a linear relationship, i.e.:where Y is the variable being forecasted and T is time.Another common model assumes constant growth rate, i.e.:Y= a + bTY= a(1+g) twhere Y is the variable being forecasted, a is a constant, g is the growth rate and t is time.The choice <strong>of</strong> the best model depends mainly on data. Whenever data is available for different times (e.g. years)statistical techniques can be used <strong>to</strong> find the best fitted model. When data is available only twice any model can befitted in principle (i.e. for each functional form parameters will always exist such as the two points lie on the curve).In such cases, additional information (e.g. trends observed in other contexts, different countries, etc.) should beused. Often, the Occam’s razor principle is applied: the simplest form is assumed unless specific informationsuggests a different choice. Therefore, a linear trend or a constant growth rate is applied in most cases.Extending an observed past trend is a commonly used approach, although one should be aware <strong>of</strong> its limitations.First, trend extrapolation does not explain demand, it just assumes that an observed past behaviour will continue inthe future. This may be quite a naïve assumption however. This is particularly true when new big <strong>projects</strong> are understudy; significant changes on the supply side can give rise <strong>to</strong> a break in past trends. Induced transport demand is acommon example.Multiple regression modelsIn the regression technique, forecasts are made on the basis <strong>of</strong> a linear relationship estimated between the forecast(or dependent) variable and the explana<strong>to</strong>ry (or independent) variables. Different combinations <strong>of</strong> independentvariables can be tested with data, until an accurate forecasting equation is derived. The nature <strong>of</strong> the independentvariables depends on the specific variable <strong>to</strong> be forecasted.Some specific models have been developed <strong>to</strong> correlate demand <strong>to</strong> some relevant variables. For instance, theconsumption-level method considers the level <strong>of</strong> consumption, using standards and defined coefficients, and can beusefully adopted for consumer products. A major determinant <strong>of</strong> consumption level is consumer income,influencing, inter alia, the household budget allocations that consumers are willing <strong>to</strong> make for a given product. Withfew exceptions, product consumption levels demonstrate a high degree <strong>of</strong> positive correlation with the income levels<strong>of</strong> consumers.Regression models are widely used and can have a strong forecasting power. The main drawbacks <strong>of</strong> this techniqueare the need for a large amount <strong>of</strong> data (as one should explore the role <strong>of</strong> several independent variables and, for eachone, a large set <strong>of</strong> values is required, across time or space) and the need for projections for the independent variables,which may be difficult. For instance, once we assume that consumption is income-dependent, the issue is then <strong>to</strong>forecast future income levels.A generalisation <strong>of</strong> the regression models is the econometric analysis where more sophisticated mathematical formsare used in which the variable being forecasted is determined by explana<strong>to</strong>ry variables such as population, income,GDP, etc. As in the regression models, the coefficients are obtained from a statistical analysis and the forecastsdepend on projections <strong>of</strong> the explana<strong>to</strong>ry variables.202
The simplest example <strong>of</strong> a relationship is a static, linear expression <strong>of</strong> the kind:Y t = a + b 1 x 1t + b 2 x 2t + e tAccording <strong>to</strong> this equation, the variable Y t (for instance, consumption in quarter t) depends on the variables Xi t (forinstance, income and price during the same period). The last, random-error, term e t denotes the variation in Y t , whichcannot be explained by the model.When estimating relationships and making forecasts, researchers frequently use data in the form <strong>of</strong> time series (i.e.data concerning the same context in different periods) or alternatively cross sections (i.e. data concerning differentcontexts over the same period). The role <strong>of</strong> time in the analysis is not trivial, especially when the objective isforecasting. Many time series are non-stationary: that is a variable, such as GDP, follows a long-run trend, wheretemporary disturbances affect its long-term level. In contrast <strong>to</strong> stationary time series, non-stationary series do notexhibit any clear-cut tendency <strong>to</strong> return on a constant value or a given trend. Estimates <strong>of</strong> relationships betweennon-stationary variables could yield nonsensical results by erroneously indicating significant relationships betweenwholly unrelated variables. So, when estimating regression models using time series data it is necessary <strong>to</strong> knowwhether the variables are stationary or not (either around a level or a deterministic linear trend) in order <strong>to</strong> avoidspurious regression relations.An example: transport demandEstimates <strong>of</strong> the financial viability <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>projects</strong> are heavily dependent on the accuracy <strong>of</strong> transport demandforecasts. Future demand is also the basis for economic and environmental appraisal <strong>of</strong> transportation infrastructure<strong>projects</strong>. The accuracy and reliability <strong>of</strong> data regarding traffic volumes, spatial traffic distribution and distributionbetween transport modes is crucial for assessing project performances.As shown by the graph below, there is a strong positive correlation between GDP and the distance travelled bypassengers and goods: goods transport tends <strong>to</strong> grow faster than GDP while, at least recently, passenger demand hastended <strong>to</strong> grow at a slower rate. In terms <strong>of</strong> elasticity, goods elasticity <strong>to</strong> GDP is above 1 while for passengers it isbelow 1.Figure A.2 Passengers, Goods, GDP, 1990 – 2002133Passengers, Goods, GDP1995-20051301271241211181151121091061031001995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Passengers (1) (pkm)Goods (2) (tkm)GDP (at constant 1995 prices)Source: EU, Energy and Transport in Figures 2006Notes: (1): passengers travelling by car, powered two-wheeler, bus, coach, tram, metro, rail, air and sea;(2): road, sea, rail, inland waterways, pipelines, air;Travel is almost always a derived demand: travel occurs and goods are shipped because people want <strong>to</strong> undertakespecific activities at different locations in an area, at different times <strong>of</strong> the day, or periods <strong>of</strong> the year, or becausegoods and commodities are required at different locations from where they were produced or s<strong>to</strong>red. Estimatingfuture travel demand entails forecasting not only the key macro drivers influencing the <strong>to</strong>tal demand (population,personal income and GDP) but also sec<strong>to</strong>ral developments, since each sec<strong>to</strong>r contributes <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>tal demandaccording <strong>to</strong> its specific characteristics.203
- Page 3:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONSBAUB/CCBA
- Page 7 and 8:
TABLESTable 2.1 Financial analysis
- Page 9:
FIGURESFigure 1.1 Project cost spre
- Page 12 and 13:
Cohesion Fund, and through the leve
- Page 14 and 15:
or the plant will not reveal excess
- Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER ONEPROJECT APPRAISAL IN THE
- Page 19 and 20:
Some specifications for financial t
- Page 21 and 22:
FOCUS: INFORMATION REQUIREDGeneral
- Page 23 and 24:
In particular, CBA results should p
- Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER TWOAN AGENDA FOR THE PROJEC
- Page 27 and 28:
objectives, are, as far as possible
- Page 29 and 30:
considered the appropriate shadow p
- Page 31 and 32:
2.3.2 Feasibility analysisFeasibili
- Page 34 and 35:
This approach will be presented in
- Page 36 and 37:
Current assets include:- receivable
- Page 38 and 39:
The following items are usually not
- Page 40 and 41:
Mainly, the examiner uses the FRR(C
- Page 42 and 43:
The dynamics of the incoming flows
- Page 44 and 45:
eturn on their own capital (Kp). Th
- Page 46 and 47:
While the approach presented in thi
- Page 48 and 49:
2.5.1 Conversion of market to accou
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.9 Electricity price dispers
- Page 52 and 53:
2.5.1.2 Fiscal correctionsSome item
- Page 54 and 55:
previously estimated in projects wi
- Page 56 and 57:
FOCUS: ENPV VS. FNPVThe difference
- Page 58 and 59:
2.6 Risk assessmentProject appraisa
- Page 60 and 61:
Table 2.14 Impact analysis of criti
- Page 62 and 63:
Figure 2.6 Probability distribution
- Page 64 and 65:
eneficiary. The project proposer sh
- Page 66 and 67:
There are many ways to design an MC
- Page 68 and 69:
PROJECT APPRAISAL CHECK-LISTCONTEXT
- Page 70 and 71:
- reduction of congestion by elimin
- Page 72 and 73:
- the methods applied to estimate e
- Page 74 and 75:
- the marginal external costs: cong
- Page 76 and 77:
- the benefits for the existing tra
- Page 78 and 79:
The following tables show some refe
- Page 80 and 81:
3.1.1.6 Risk assessmentDue to their
- Page 82 and 83:
As shown in Figure 3.1, only under
- Page 84 and 85:
3.1.3.7 Other project evaluation ap
- Page 87 and 88:
- Waste Management Hierarchy rules
- Page 89 and 90:
The time horizon for a project anal
- Page 91 and 92:
3.2.1.7 Other project evaluation ap
- Page 93 and 94:
every user support the total costs
- Page 95 and 96:
Territorial reference frameworkIf t
- Page 97 and 98:
Cycle and phases of the projectGrea
- Page 99 and 100:
One of the most important aims of t
- Page 101 and 102:
projects, as in other sectors in wh
- Page 103 and 104:
3.2.3.2 Project identificationBasic
- Page 105 and 106:
3.2.3.7 Other project evaluation ap
- Page 107 and 108:
In order to evaluate the overall im
- Page 109 and 110:
for regassification plants, number
- Page 111 and 112:
Examples of objectives are:- change
- Page 113 and 114:
decontamination if any;- the techni
- Page 115 and 116:
3.3.3.6 Risk AnalysisCritical facto
- Page 117 and 118:
3.3.4.6 Risk assessmentCritical fac
- Page 119 and 120:
3.4.1.5 Economic analysisThe follow
- Page 121 and 122:
Financial inflows• Admission fees
- Page 123 and 124:
expectancy suitably adjusted by the
- Page 125 and 126:
The time horizon for project analys
- Page 127 and 128:
A Cost-Benefit Analysis should cons
- Page 129 and 130:
CHAPTER FOURCASE STUDIESOverviewThi
- Page 131 and 132:
- finally, there is the traffic tha
- Page 134 and 135:
c) Road users producer’s surplus:
- Page 136 and 137:
4.1.5 Scenario analysisTwo scenario
- Page 138 and 139:
The financial performance indicator
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 4.10 Economic analysis (Milli
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 4.12 Financial return on capi
- Page 144 and 145:
4.2 Case Study: investment in a rai
- Page 146 and 147:
4.2.4 Economic analysisThe benefits
- Page 148 and 149:
Financial investment costs have bee
- Page 150 and 151:
Figure 4.6 Results of the risk anal
- Page 152 and 153: Table 4.22 Economic analysis (Milli
- Page 154 and 155: Table 4.24 Financial return on capi
- Page 156 and 157: 4.3 Case Study: investment in an in
- Page 158 and 159: ate of 0.6% per year is assumed for
- Page 160 and 161: The shadow price of the CO 2 avoide
- Page 162 and 163: As a result, the probability distri
- Page 164 and 165: Table 4.36 Financial return on capi
- Page 166 and 167: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
- Page 168 and 169: 4.4 Case Study: investment in a was
- Page 170 and 171: 4.4.2 Financial analysisAlthough in
- Page 172 and 173: THE CALCULATION OF REVENUESReferrin
- Page 174 and 175: 0.15 m 3 /m 2 a depreciation of 20%
- Page 176 and 177: As result, the probability distribu
- Page 178 and 179: Figure 4.13 Probability distributio
- Page 180 and 181: Table 4.48 Financial return on nati
- Page 182 and 183: Table 4.50 Financial return on priv
- Page 184 and 185: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
- Page 186 and 187: 4.5 Case Study: industrial investme
- Page 188 and 189: 4.5.4.1 Investment costsThe total i
- Page 190 and 191: Finally, a residual value was estim
- Page 192 and 193: This analysis shows the need to pay
- Page 194 and 195: Table 4.62 Financial return on inve
- Page 196 and 197: Table 4.64 Return on private equity
- Page 198 and 199: Table 4.66 Economic analysis (thous
- Page 200 and 201: ANNEX ADEMAND ANALYSISDemand foreca
- Page 204 and 205: Furthermore, travel demand depends
- Page 206 and 207: This Guide supports a unique refere
- Page 208 and 209: A higher discount rate for countrie
- Page 210 and 211: Figure C.1 Project ranking by NPV v
- Page 212 and 213: The main problems with this indicat
- Page 214 and 215: EXAMPLE OF SHADOW WAGE IN DUAL MARK
- Page 216 and 217: Another exhaustive way to include d
- Page 218 and 219: Figure E.2 Percentage of low income
- Page 220 and 221: ANNEX FEVALUATION OF HEALTH &ENVIRO
- Page 222 and 223: Figure F.1 Main evaluation methodsS
- Page 224 and 225: - expenditure on capital equipment
- Page 226 and 227: due to air pollution or water conta
- Page 228 and 229: BENEFIT TRANSFER - SELECTED REFEREN
- Page 230 and 231: ANNEX GEVALUATION OF PPP PROJECTSIt
- Page 232 and 233: adjustments for Competitive Neutral
- Page 234 and 235: ANNEX HRISK ASSESSMENTIn ex-ante pr
- Page 236 and 237: Reference ForecastingThe question o
- Page 238 and 239: Figure H.5 Levels of risks in diffe
- Page 240 and 241: ANNEX IDETERMINATION OF THE EU GRAN
- Page 242 and 243: A.4. Technological Alternatives and
- Page 244 and 245: GLOSSARYAccounting period: the inte
- Page 246 and 247: Market price: the price at which a
- Page 248 and 249: BIBLIOGRAPHY1. ReferencesBelli, P.,
- Page 250 and 251: Ray, A. 1984, Cost-benefit analysis
- Page 252 and 253:
EnvironmentGeneralAtkinson, G., 200
- Page 254 and 255:
European Commission, DG Tren, 2003,