13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANNEX CPROJECT PERFORMANCE INDICATORSThis annex explains how <strong>to</strong> calculate and use the main project performance indica<strong>to</strong>rs for CBA analysis: Net PresentValue (NPV), Internal Rate <strong>of</strong> Return (IRR) and the Benefit-Cost Ratio (B/C).The indica<strong>to</strong>rs provide concise information about project performance and are the basis for ranking <strong>projects</strong>. Thepreferred indica<strong>to</strong>r is the NPV.The Net Present ValueThe Net Present Value <strong>of</strong> a project is the sum <strong>of</strong> the discounted net flows <strong>of</strong> a project. The NPV is a very conciseperformance indica<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> an <strong>investment</strong> project: it represents the present amount <strong>of</strong> the net benefits (i.e. benefits lesscosts) flow generated by the <strong>investment</strong> expressed in one single value with the same unit <strong>of</strong> measurement used in theaccounting tables.Financial and economic tables are defined by inflows (I 1 , I 2 , I 3 , …), outflows (O 1 , O 2 , O 3 , …) and balances (S 1 , S 2 , S 3 ,… for time 1, 2, 3, …). Inflows and outflows are distributed over a number <strong>of</strong> years and this could generateproblems if we want <strong>to</strong> sum S at time 1 and S at time 2 and so on. These problems are due <strong>to</strong> the fact that themarginal utility <strong>of</strong> one Euro <strong>to</strong>day is higher than the marginal utility <strong>of</strong> one Euro in year 2. There are two basicinterrelated reasons for this:- there exists a positive opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> numeraire: a unit benefit is worth less the further it occurs in thefuture;- individuals have positive time preferences, because <strong>of</strong> risk aversion for future events, because income is afunction that increases with time, while marginal utility for consumption decreases, and because <strong>of</strong> purepreferences for present utility compared <strong>to</strong> future utility.The aggregation <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits occurring in different years can be carried out by weighting them. This boilsdown <strong>to</strong> applying appropriate coefficients, decreasing with time in order <strong>to</strong> measure the loss <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> the numeraire.Such a coefficient is discounting fac<strong>to</strong>r a t = (1+i) -t , where t is the time, i is the rate <strong>of</strong> discount and a t is the coefficientfor discounting a value in year t <strong>to</strong> obtain its present value.The Net Present Value <strong>of</strong> a project is defined as:n SNPV = ∑ a tS t=0S+1S+ ... +nt=0 (1 + i) 0 (1+ i) 1 (1 + i) nWhere S t is the balance <strong>of</strong> cash flow at time t and a t is the financial discount fac<strong>to</strong>r chosen for discounting at time t.It is important <strong>to</strong> notice that the balance <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits in the early years <strong>of</strong> a project is usually negative and i<strong>to</strong>nly becomes positive after some years. As a t decreases with time, negative values in the early years are weightedmore than the positive ones occurring in the later years <strong>of</strong> a project’s life. The value <strong>of</strong> the discount rate and thechoice <strong>of</strong> the time horizon are crucial for the determination <strong>of</strong> the NPV <strong>of</strong> a project.NPV is a very simple and precise performance indica<strong>to</strong>r. A positive NPV, NPV>0, means that the project generatesa net benefit (because the sum <strong>of</strong> the weighted flows <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits is positive) and it is generally desirableeither in financial terms or in economic terms. When different options are considered, the ranking <strong>of</strong> the NPVs <strong>of</strong>the alternatives indicates the best one. For instance in Figure C.1 project 1 is more desirable than project 2 because itshows a higher NPV for all the discount rates (i) applied.209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!