13.07.2015 Views

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

Guide to COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of investment projects - Ramiri

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Whenever some inputs are affected by strong price dis<strong>to</strong>rtions, the proposer should address the issue inthe project appraisal and use accounting (‘shadow’) prices <strong>to</strong> better reflect the social opportunity cost <strong>of</strong>the resources (see Figure 2.4). We discuss below some shadow prices that may be needed in practice.For some key national CBA parameters, the calculations should, in principle, be done by a planning <strong>of</strong>fice<strong>of</strong> the Member State and certainly not project-by-project, because <strong>of</strong> its macroeconomic nature.- In some cases, when there is no full convertibility <strong>of</strong> the currency, one parameter for economicanalysis is the shadow exchange rate (SER). This is the economic price <strong>of</strong> foreign currency, which maydiverge from the <strong>of</strong>ficial exchange rate (OER). In general, the greater the divergence between the OERand the SER, the more likely will depreciation or appreciation occur and affect project performance.While all accounts for project analysis under the EU Funds should be in euros, including those forcountries which are not in the EMU, the use <strong>of</strong> a SER for the Member States is not suggested because<strong>of</strong> free currency convertibility and lack <strong>of</strong> controls on capital flows. The issue can, however, beconsidered for some candidate countries under IPA assistance if there is a need <strong>to</strong> add realism <strong>to</strong>project analysis when there are constraints on international capital flows.- In general, the use <strong>of</strong> a standard conversion fac<strong>to</strong>r (SCF) for some project cash flows is preferred <strong>to</strong>the SER because in principle it captures the same dis<strong>to</strong>rtions as the SER while being more consistentwith the use <strong>of</strong> other (sec<strong>to</strong>r-specific) conversion fac<strong>to</strong>rs. The value <strong>of</strong> the SCF is estimated on thebasis <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong> exports and imports (see example below). If the planning authority does no<strong>to</strong>ffer its own estimates, SCF=1 should be the default rule.EXAMPLE: CALCULATION OF THE STANDARD CONVERSION FACTORThese are an example <strong>of</strong> data for the estimate <strong>of</strong> the standard conversion fac<strong>to</strong>r (Millions <strong>of</strong> Euros):1) <strong>to</strong>tal imports (M) M = 20002) <strong>to</strong>tal exports (X) X = 15003) import taxes (T m ) T m = 9004) export taxes (T x ) T x = 25The formula <strong>to</strong> be used for the calculation <strong>of</strong> the Standard Conversion Fac<strong>to</strong>r is (SCF):SCF = (M + X) / [(M + T m ) + (X - T x )]SCF = 0.8.In practice, calculations may be more complex, because <strong>of</strong> non-tariff barriers and other sources <strong>of</strong> international tradedis<strong>to</strong>rtions, for example in the foreign trade restrictions between EU and non EU countries; because <strong>of</strong> special regulations forthe service sec<strong>to</strong>r; because <strong>of</strong> different tax patterns across countries and sec<strong>to</strong>rs.- The project examiner needs <strong>to</strong> carefully assess and consider how the social costs are affected bydepartures <strong>of</strong> observed prices from the following reference values:♦ marginal costs for internationally non-tradable goods, such as local transport services;♦ border prices for internationally tradable goods, such as agricultural crops or some energy servicesor manufactured goods.For every traded item, border prices are easily available: they are international prices, CIF for imports andFOB for exports, expressed in the same currency. Where the relevant economic border lies is a matter <strong>to</strong>be ascertained on a case-by-case basis. For example the external border <strong>of</strong> the EU may be relevant forsome sec<strong>to</strong>rs but not for others. The key empirical indica<strong>to</strong>r for assessing whether border prices should beused is the dispersion <strong>of</strong> prices across countries for the same tradable good or service. Table 2.9, showingthat there is a difference up <strong>to</strong> 250% across countries for prices paid by EU consumers <strong>of</strong> electricity,provides an example.49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!