13.07.2015 Views

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4Below 5%, called the lower explosivelimit (LEL), methane-air mixturescannot ignite. 3Figure 1–1.—Depiction of methane be<strong>in</strong>g diluted <strong>in</strong>to a mov<strong>in</strong>gair stream.Because methane always passesthrough an explosive range dur<strong>in</strong>gdilution, an effective m<strong>in</strong>e ventilationsystem will ensure that thispassage through the explosive rangeis as rapid as possible and that thevolume of gas mixture <strong>in</strong> or abovethe explosive range is m<strong>in</strong>imized.Even though methane-air mixtures under 5% are notexplosive, worldwide experience with methane <strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong>es has <strong>in</strong>dicated that a considerable marg<strong>in</strong> ofsafety must be provided.Addition of <strong>in</strong>ert gases. An <strong>in</strong>ert gas such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide cannot chemicallyreact with methane. As a result, <strong>in</strong>ert gases can be added to an explosive methane-air mixture tomake it nonexplosive.Explosibility diagrams are available to f<strong>in</strong>d how much <strong>in</strong>ert gas is necessary. For example,Zabetakis et al. [1959] have provided a helpful explosibility diagram that shows whether amethane-air mixture is explosive after an <strong>in</strong>ert gas such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide is added(Figure 1–2). This diagram shows that methane-air-<strong>in</strong>ert gas mixtures fall <strong>in</strong>to one of threecategories: (A) explosive, (B) explosive when mixed with air, or (C) nonexplosive, depend<strong>in</strong>gon the percentage of methane and the percentage of “effective <strong>in</strong>ert.” Effective <strong>in</strong>ert iscalculated from the percentage of “excess nitrogen” 4 and the percentage of carbon dioxide <strong>in</strong> themixture.3 Sometimes the UEL and LEL are referred to as the upper and lower flammable limits (UFL and LFL).4 The percentage of excess nitrogen is the percentage of nitrogen <strong>in</strong> the sample m<strong>in</strong>us the percentage of “normalnitrogen.” Normal nitrogen is calculated from the ratio of nitrogen to oxygen normally found <strong>in</strong> air—a factor of 3.8.To calculate the effective <strong>in</strong>ert, suppose, <strong>for</strong> example, that <strong>in</strong>ert gas is added to a methane-air mixture and that a gasanalysis shows that the f<strong>in</strong>al mixture has 6.6% oxygen, 4% carbon dioxide, 4.3% methane, and 85.1% nitrogen. Theeffective <strong>in</strong>ert is then determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> three steps. First, <strong>in</strong> this example, the oxygen percentage is 6.6%, so thepercentage of normal nitrogen is 3.8 times 6.6%, or 25.1%. Second, s<strong>in</strong>ce the percentage of excess nitrogen is thepercentage of nitrogen <strong>in</strong> the sample m<strong>in</strong>us the percent of normal nitrogen, the excess nitrogen is 85.1% m<strong>in</strong>us25.1%, or 60%. Third, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the equation shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1–2, s<strong>in</strong>ce the carbon dioxide <strong>in</strong> the sample is4%, the effective <strong>in</strong>ert is now 60%, plus 1.5 times (4%), or 66%. This gives the “composition po<strong>in</strong>t” shown <strong>in</strong>Figure 1–2. (Carbon dioxide has been found to be 50% more effective than nitrogen <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ert<strong>in</strong>g, so a multiply<strong>in</strong>gfactor of 1.5 is used).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!