13.07.2015 Views

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

Handbook for Methane Control in Mining - AMMSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17THE IMPORTANCE OF HIGHER AIR VELOCITY IN PREVENTINGMETHANE EXPLOSIONSLow air velocities can lead to poor mix<strong>in</strong>g between methaneand air. This poor mix<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> turn leads to fluctuations <strong>in</strong> themethane concentration that make an ignition more likely.Bakke et al. [1967] first suggested that a measurement of the methane concentration alone is an<strong>in</strong>complete means of assess<strong>in</strong>g the ignition hazard and that other measurable ventilation quantitiesmight be important. 31 A study of methane ignitions <strong>in</strong> U.K. coal m<strong>in</strong>es found that theprobability of an ignition is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by both the methane concentration and the densimetricFroude number, a dimensionless quantity related to the gas-mix<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong> the presence ofbuoyancy <strong>for</strong>ces. The expression <strong>for</strong> the Froude number F is—2uF =∆ρg Aρ∆ρwhere u is the air velocity, is the density difference between air and methane divided by theρdensity of air, and A is the cross-sectional area of the airway.The data available to Bakke et al. resulted from 123 ignitions on faces and gate roads at U.K.longwalls dur<strong>in</strong>g 1958–1965. Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the data <strong>in</strong>dicated that the risk of an ignition wasdependent on more than methane concentration alone and that it was possible to comb<strong>in</strong>e concentrationand Froude number <strong>in</strong> one variable of the <strong>for</strong>m c 2 /F.Figure 1–9 shows the normalized number of ignitions P (ignitions per year per gate road) versusc 2 /F <strong>for</strong> the Bakke et al. data. The best fit to the data was P = 0.004 (c 2 /F) 0.9 . A high correlationwas obta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that, absent other sources of mix<strong>in</strong>g, the risk of ignition P does dependon the variable c 2 /F.In most m<strong>in</strong>es, A does not change much compared to changes <strong>in</strong> c 2 and u 2 . Also, the factor of0.9 is close to 1.0. It follows that ignition risk varies with the quantity (c/u) 2 . This departs fromany notion that ignition risk depends on the concentration c alone. 3231 Actually, s<strong>in</strong>ce ignition risk also depends on human factors, there is no reason to expect that ignition risk dependsonly on concentration. M<strong>in</strong>es with less gas may also have a less vigilant work<strong>for</strong>ce. However, Bakke et al. onlysought a correlation with measurable ventilation quantities.32 Subsequent work at longwall shearers <strong>in</strong> the 1980s failed to confirm this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g [Creedy and Phillips 1997; CEC1985], probably because water sprays on the shearer provided enough mix<strong>in</strong>g between methane and air to overcomeany velocity effect on mix<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!