Outbursts are often driven not only by gas pressure, but also by <strong>in</strong>herent, concentrated stressfields <strong>in</strong> the rock mass. Hyman [1987] summarizes several methods to reduce <strong>in</strong> situ strata gaspressures to prevent outbursts. These techniques <strong>in</strong>clude the use of modified m<strong>in</strong>e open<strong>in</strong>ggeometries, shot fir<strong>in</strong>g, and water <strong>in</strong>fusion, all of which have been successfully used abroad toabate outbursts.Blowers most often emanate from underly<strong>in</strong>g strata. The recommended remediation technique isthe use of cross-measure holes angled downward from the m<strong>in</strong>e head<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>tercept the fissureor fault, which acts as a gas conduit. The borehole(s) may then be used to dra<strong>in</strong> gas away fromthe blower outlet <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>e work<strong>in</strong>gs.109GENERAL REMEDIATION CONSIDERATIONSWhen unanticipated gas emissions cause repeatedproduction <strong>in</strong>terruptions, m<strong>in</strong>e operators mustunderstand that they have a gas problem.In order to determ<strong>in</strong>e the most appropriate course of action to remediate a gas emission problem,the m<strong>in</strong>e operator must make a thorough evaluation of the cause, extent, and severity of the problem.The cause of the problem may be as simple as underestimat<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al gas content ofthe coalbed, or it may be more complex and <strong>in</strong>volve gas sources outside the m<strong>in</strong>ed coalbed.Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the extent of the problem may only entail additional gas content test<strong>in</strong>g [Diamondand Schatzel 1998] of the m<strong>in</strong>ed coalbed through exploratory boreholes, or it may require extensiveunderground methane monitor<strong>in</strong>g surveys or gas monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>strumentation. Also, detailedunderground mapp<strong>in</strong>g of geologic features may be needed to del<strong>in</strong>eate and predict gas emissiontrends. Remediation may require only an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> ventilation airflow to the face, or it mayrequire an extensive mapp<strong>in</strong>g and drill<strong>in</strong>g program to del<strong>in</strong>eate and alleviate the problem.Often when unusually high methane emissions are unexpectedly encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,operators must make quick decisions about how to address the problem. A prudent operatorshould weigh several pert<strong>in</strong>ent factors be<strong>for</strong>e embark<strong>in</strong>g on any course of action.If <strong>in</strong>creased ventilation capacity alone cannot alleviate the problem, operators, especially smallerones, do not always have the available expertise, human resources, or equipment to evaluate theproblem and implement either a surface or <strong>in</strong>-m<strong>in</strong>e borehole methane dra<strong>in</strong>age program and willneed to rely on outside consultants. <strong>Methane</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>age systems drilled from the surface generallyrequire fewer boreholes, but need good geologic control to effectively hit the gas-bear<strong>in</strong>g zone.These boreholes generally require dewater<strong>in</strong>g, hydraulic fractur<strong>in</strong>g, and sufficient time to beoptimally effective. <strong>Methane</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>age systems drilled from the surface have associated issueswith the procurement of appropriate and accessible drill<strong>in</strong>g sites and environmental concerns <strong>for</strong>water disposal and site reclamation.
110In-m<strong>in</strong>e methane dra<strong>in</strong>age systems generally require more boreholes and may also requiredewater<strong>in</strong>g. However, they can be drilled relatively quickly and require less time to be optimallyeffective. Additionally, <strong>in</strong>-m<strong>in</strong>e methane dra<strong>in</strong>age systems will require an underground gasgather<strong>in</strong>gsystem to transport gas from the boreholes to the surface, usually via one or morevertical boreholes drilled <strong>for</strong> that purpose. In-m<strong>in</strong>e systems may also have accessibility constra<strong>in</strong>tsdue to poor roof or floor conditions or other m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g-related safety issues <strong>in</strong> the areawhere holes need to be drilled.It should be noted that there may be regulatory requirements that need to be addressed whenmethane dra<strong>in</strong>age systems are associated with m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations. In the United States, a recentbullet<strong>in</strong> issued by the M<strong>in</strong>e Safety and Health Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (MSHA) states that “MSHA hasdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed that [coalbed methane] wells are subject to the ventilation plan and mapp<strong>in</strong>g requirementsthat apply to methane degas holes” [McK<strong>in</strong>ney 2005]. If coalbed gas of sufficient qualityand quantity is produced by the methane dra<strong>in</strong>age system, the gas has the potential to be sold <strong>for</strong>commercial use, which helps defray the costs of methane dra<strong>in</strong>age.After a methane dra<strong>in</strong>age system is put <strong>in</strong>to place, it can only be effective as long as it is operat<strong>in</strong>gproperly. Operators must consider who will operate and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the system once it is<strong>in</strong>stalled. If <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong>-house, personnel may need to be permanently assigned to the project.If outside contractors are used <strong>for</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stallation, will they be reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>for</strong> long-term operationand ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, or will m<strong>in</strong>e personnel need tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to operate and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the system oncethe contractor leaves?The economics of any methane dra<strong>in</strong>age system under consideration <strong>in</strong>volves weigh<strong>in</strong>g the prosand cons of all of the factors discussed above. The f<strong>in</strong>al remediation plan will hopefully be onethat, under the site-specific circumstances, will create a safer underground workplace <strong>for</strong> them<strong>in</strong>ers while m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g capital <strong>in</strong>vestment and human resources.REFERENCESAyruni AT [1984]. Theory and practice of m<strong>in</strong>e gas control at deep levels. Rockville, MD:Terraspace, Inc.Beamish BB, Crosdale PJ [1998]. Instantaneous outbursts <strong>in</strong> underground coal m<strong>in</strong>es:an overview and association with coal type. Int J Coal Geol 35:27–55.Campoli AA, Trevits MA, Mol<strong>in</strong>da GM [1985]. Coal and gas outbursts: prediction and prevention.Coal M<strong>in</strong> 22(12):42–44, 47.Cao Y, He D, Glick DC [2001]. Coal and gas outbursts <strong>in</strong> footwalls of reverse faults. Int J CoalGeol 48(1–2):47–63.Chase FE, Ulery JP [1987]. Clay ve<strong>in</strong>s: their occurrence, characteristics, and support. Pittsburgh,PA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of M<strong>in</strong>es, RI 9060. NTIS No. PB87204517.
- Page 1 and 2:
TMIC 9486Information Circular/2006H
- Page 3 and 4:
ORDERING INFORMATIONCopies of Natio
- Page 5 and 6:
ILLUSTRATIONS—ContinuedPage4-6. U
- Page 8:
HANDBOOK FOR METHANE CONTROL IN MIN
- Page 11 and 12:
4Below 5%, called the lower explosi
- Page 13 and 14:
6reduced pressure, except at very l
- Page 15 and 16:
8Static electricity. Protection aga
- Page 17 and 18:
10Figure 1-4.—Estimated methane c
- Page 19 and 20:
12LAYERING OF METHANE AT THE MINE R
- Page 21 and 22:
14good eyesight. 24methane level.Ot
- Page 23 and 24:
16a material balance indicated that
- Page 25 and 26:
18As an example, assume that themet
- Page 27 and 28:
20Figure 1-10.—Relative frequency
- Page 29 and 30:
22Davies AW, Isaac AK, Cook PM [200
- Page 31 and 32:
24Margerson SNA, Robinson H, Wilkin
- Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 2.—SAMPLING FOR METHANE I
- Page 35 and 36:
29USING PORTABLE METHANE DETECTORST
- Page 37 and 38:
Out-of-range gas concentrations in
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 2-3.—Recorder chart from a
- Page 41 and 42:
35Industrial Scientific Corp. [2004
- Page 43 and 44:
38peaks, not the overallmethane lev
- Page 45 and 46:
40hung on J-hook assemblies, which
- Page 47 and 48:
42Methane dilution effectiveness.Th
- Page 49 and 50:
44found that effective scrubber ope
- Page 51 and 52:
46When the scrubber exhaust is not
- Page 53 and 54:
48Methane monitors are usually moun
- Page 55 and 56:
50to use radial bits instead of con
- Page 57 and 58:
52Mott ML, Chuhta EJ [1991]. Face v
- Page 59 and 60:
54Service, Centers for Disease Cont
- Page 61 and 62:
56Methane accumulationsaround thesh
- Page 63 and 64: 58corner and by 43% at supportNo. 4
- Page 65 and 66: 60When using water sprays to reduce
- Page 67 and 68: 62Cecala AB, Zimmer JA, Thimons ED
- Page 69 and 70: 64DESIGNING BLEEDER SYSTEMSAs part
- Page 71 and 72: 66Caved area characteristics. The c
- Page 73 and 74: 68then move this gas into the activ
- Page 75 and 76: 70perform tests to determine whethe
- Page 77 and 78: 72A major purpose of the bleeder sy
- Page 79 and 80: 74• Inlets to the pillared area n
- Page 81 and 82: 76REFERENCESCFR. Code of federal re
- Page 83 and 84: 78Methane is released into each min
- Page 85 and 86: 80Figure 6-1.—Gas content of coal
- Page 87 and 88: 82Figure 6-3.—Simplified illustra
- Page 89 and 90: 842. In-mine inclined or vertical b
- Page 91 and 92: 861. Packed cavity method and its v
- Page 93 and 94: 88Table 6-3.—Methane capture rati
- Page 95 and 96: 90Early experiences with this metho
- Page 97 and 98: 9211. At the surface installation (
- Page 99 and 100: 94• Estimated cost for moderately
- Page 101 and 102: 96Thakur PC [1981]. Methane control
- Page 103 and 104: 98Anomalous, unanticipated methane
- Page 105 and 106: 100Vertical methane drainage boreho
- Page 107 and 108: 102Figure 7-2 shows a mine entry ap
- Page 109 and 110: 104obvious solution to this problem
- Page 111 and 112: 106Figure 7-8.—Hypothetical gas c
- Page 113: 108Lama and Bodziony [1998] compile
- Page 117 and 118: 112Iannacchione AT, Ulery JP, Hyman
- Page 119 and 120: 114More sophisticated reservoir eng
- Page 121 and 122: 116coal lithotype on gas content is
- Page 123 and 124: 118FORECASTING REMAINING GAS-IN-PLA
- Page 125 and 126: 120⎛ y⎞⎜⎛⎞ ⎛ ⎞= ⎜
- Page 127 and 128: 122emissions. The geometry and size
- Page 129 and 130: 124Reservoir models require a subst
- Page 131 and 132: 126King GR, Ertekin T [1989a]. A su
- Page 133 and 134: 128an area of 314 ft 2 would requir
- Page 135 and 136: 130In the case of the abovementione
- Page 137 and 138: 132FILLING SHAFTS AT CLOSED MINESFi
- Page 139 and 140: 134Hinderfeld G [1995]. Ventilation
- Page 141 and 142: 136To calculate the effectiveinert,
- Page 143 and 144: 138exhaust. The remaining diesel ex
- Page 145 and 146: 140required only 4 min. As a result
- Page 147 and 148: 142Figure 11-1.—Desorption test a
- Page 149 and 150: 144enclosed in a tunnel-like struct
- Page 151 and 152: 146Kolada RJ [1985]. Investigation
- Page 153 and 154: 148air in a 6-ft by 9-ft by 6.5-ft
- Page 155 and 156: 150represents flammable mixtures. F
- Page 157 and 158: 152• In Eastern Europe, petroleum
- Page 159 and 160: 154Category II applies to domal sal
- Page 161 and 162: 1562. Monitoring for gas and taking
- Page 163 and 164: 158These mines typically have large
- Page 165 and 166:
160Dave Graham is the safety and he
- Page 167 and 168:
162Figure 13-2.—Examples of metha
- Page 169 and 170:
164REFERENCESAndrews JN [1987]. Nob
- Page 171 and 172:
166APPENDIX A.—ONTARIO OCCUPATION
- Page 174 and 175:
169CHAPTER 14.—PREVENTING METHANE
- Page 176 and 177:
Ways to confirm the presence of gas
- Page 178 and 179:
173The tunnel face is usually venti
- Page 180 and 181:
175Figure 14-5.—TBM ventilation s
- Page 182 and 183:
face. While one of these elements a
- Page 184 and 185:
179ELIMINATING IGNITION SOURCESElec
- Page 186 and 187:
181INDEXAAbnormally gassy faces....
- Page 188 and 189:
183NNatural ventilation, coal silos
- Page 190 and 191:
Delivering on the Nation’s Promis